Mirjam M Garvelink

Biographic Data

ID7596619
NAMEMirjam M Garvelink
GIVEN NAMESMirjam M
FAMILY NAMEGarvelink
SIGNATUREGARVELINK M M
AFFILIATIONSDepartment of Gynecology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands
ORCID0000-0001-5616-0597
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS7
TOTAL CITATIONS0
AUTHOR COUNT7
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2015
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2024
H-INDEX0

  • Evaluating patient participation in value‐based healthcare

    Open AccessHenrike J Westerink, Mirjam M Garvelink et al.ARTICLEHealth Expectations2024

    INTRODUCTION: Value-based healthcare (VBHC) focusses on increasing value for patients. Hospitals aim to implement VBHC via value improvement (VI) teams for medical conditions. To determine the patient's perspective on value, collective patient participation is important in these teams. We therefore evaluated the current state of patient participation in VI teams and share lessons learned. METHODS: This mixed-methods study was conducted at seven c…

  • Barriers and facilitators of meaningful patient participation at the collective level in healthcare organizations

    Open AccessHenrike J Westerink, Tom Oirbans et al.ARTICLEHealth Policy2023

  • The pitfalls of scaling up evidence-based interventions in health

    Open AccessHervé Tchala Vignon Zomahoun, Ali Ben Charif et al.ARTICLEGlobal Health Action2019

    Policy-makers worldwide are increasingly interested in scaling up evidence-based interventions (EBIs) to larger populations, and implementation scientists are developing frameworks and methodologies for achieving this. But scaling-up does not always produce the desired results. Why not? We aimed to enhance awareness of the various pitfalls to be anticipated when planning scale-up. In lower- and middle-income countries (LMICs), the scale-up of hea…

  • Implementation of the three good questions—A feasibility study in Dutch hospital departments

    Open AccessMirjam M Garvelink, Marja Jillissen et al.ARTICLEHealth Expectations2019

    OBJECTIVES: To determine the feasibility of pragmatic implementation strategies for three good questions (in Dutch: Drie Goede Vragen; 3GV. What are my options; what are the risks and benefits related to these options; and what does this mean for my situation?) to increase shared decision-making (SDM) efforts in Dutch secondary care, and identify barriers and facilitators of implementation. METHODS: Convergent mixed-method design: pre-post survey…

  • Factors associated with shared decision making among primary care physicians

    Open AccessMatthew Menear, Mirjam M Garvelink et al.ARTICLEHealth Expectations2018

    BACKGROUND: Despite growing recognition that shared decision making (SDM) is central for patient-centred primary care, adoption by physicians remains limited in routine practice. OBJECTIVE: To examine the characteristics of physicians, patients and consultations associated with primary care physicians' SDM behaviours during routine care. METHODS: A multicentre cross-sectional survey study was conducted with 114 unique patient-physician dyads recr…

  • Women's experiences with information provision and deciding about fertility preservation in the Netherlands

    Open AccessMirjam M Garvelink, Moniek M ter Kuile et al.ARTICLEHealth Expectations2015

    OBJECTIVE: It is not well-known how women receiving counselling consultation about fertility preservation (FP) in the Netherlands perceive the information provision about and referral for FP in the oncology setting. The aim of this study was to qualitatively explore women's experiences with the (process of) information provision about the gonadotoxic effects of cancer treatment and about FP and the decision-making process and to obtain their reco…

  • Validation of a Dutch Version of the Reproductive Concerns Scale (RCS) in Three Populations of Women

    Mirjam M Garvelink, Moniek M ter Kuile et al.ARTICLEHealth Care For Women International2015

    We investigated the psychometric properties of a Dutch version of the Reproductive Concerns Scale (RCS). Questionnaires (N = 515) were administered to 90 women with breast cancer, 227 women with fertility problems, and 198 healthy controls. Principal axis factor analysis suggested a one-factor structure with 11 items (breast cancer patients R(2) =.48, α =.87, ICC =.95; women with fertility problems R(2) =.45, α =.89, ICC =.86). Women with fertili…