Fabian Holzhüter
Biographic Data
| ID | 7644767 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Fabian Holzhüter |
| GIVEN NAMES | Fabian |
| FAMILY NAME | Holzhüter |
| SIGNATURE | HOLZHÜTER F |
| AFFILIATIONS | Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie Technische Universität München Munich Germany |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-7342-909X |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 3 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2021 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2021 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Barriers and facilitators of shared decision making in acutely ill inpatients with schizophrenia—Qualitative findings from the intervention group of a randomised‐controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Shared decision making (SDM) is appreciated as a promising model of communication between clinicians and patients. However, in acute mental health settings, its implementation is still unsatisfactory. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to examine barriers and facilitators of SDM with acutely ill inpatients with schizophrenia. DESIGN: A qualitative interview study was performed. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: trial that demonstrated a sign…
‘Triadic’ shared decision making in mental health
BACKGROUND: Shared decision making (SDM) in mental health may contribute to greater patient satisfaction and is sometimes associated with better health outcomes. Here, SDM should not only involve service users and clinicians but also involve the service users' caregivers. AIM: This study aimed to achieve better insight into the current SDM patterns of triads of service users, caregivers and clinicians in inpatient mental health care and the three…
Clinical Decision-Making During Psychiatric Ward Rounds
Introduction: For psychiatric in-patients, ward rounds are a prominent occasion for decision making. As previous findings on shared decision-making (SDM) patterns mostly derive from out-patients and one-to-one-consultations, it was our aim to investigate SDM during psychiatric ward rounds. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study and included n = 62 in-patients from seven different psychiatric wards. We collected data from the patient and th…
No prominent works on this page.
Barriers and facilitators of shared decision making in acutely ill inpatients with schizophrenia—Qualitative findings from the intervention group of a randomised‐controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Shared decision making (SDM) is appreciated as a promising model of communication between clinicians and patients. However, in acute mental health settings, its implementation is still unsatisfactory. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to examine barriers and facilitators of SDM with acutely ill inpatients with schizophrenia. DESIGN: A qualitative interview study was performed. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: trial that demonstrated a sign…
‘Triadic’ shared decision making in mental health
BACKGROUND: Shared decision making (SDM) in mental health may contribute to greater patient satisfaction and is sometimes associated with better health outcomes. Here, SDM should not only involve service users and clinicians but also involve the service users' caregivers. AIM: This study aimed to achieve better insight into the current SDM patterns of triads of service users, caregivers and clinicians in inpatient mental health care and the three…
Clinical Decision-Making During Psychiatric Ward Rounds
Introduction: For psychiatric in-patients, ward rounds are a prominent occasion for decision making. As previous findings on shared decision-making (SDM) patterns mostly derive from out-patients and one-to-one-consultations, it was our aim to investigate SDM during psychiatric ward rounds. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study and included n = 62 in-patients from seven different psychiatric wards. We collected data from the patient and th…
Medicine (3 works) · Nursing (3 works) · Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (3 works) · Psychiatry (3 works) · Family medicine (2 works) · Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (2 works) · Mental Health and Patient Involvement (2 works) · Psychology (2 works) · Empathy and Medical Education (1 work) · Focus group (1 work)