Giuliana Raffaella Longworth
Biographic Data
| ID | 7687911 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Giuliana Raffaella Longworth |
| GIVEN NAMES | Giuliana Raffaella |
| FAMILY NAME | Longworth |
| SIGNATURE | LONGWORTH G R |
| AFFILIATIONS | Universitat Ramon Llull |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-9063-4821 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 6 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 6 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2024 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
A realist inspired barriers and facilitators evaluation of the co-creation process in the Youth-centred Participatory Action Project
This study examined barriers and facilitators of the first phase of the co-creation process as part of the Youth-centred Participatory Action (YoPA) project, a multi-country co-creation initiative to address health inequities by engaging adolescents in Denmark, Nigeria, South Africa, and the Netherlands. Using a qualitative design informed by implementation science and realist thinking, we analysed data from 22 transcripts of semi-structured inte…
Establishing fundamental co-design principles and strategies for public health research practice
This study focuses on defining standard co-design principles and exploring strategies for their application in public health research. A secondary analysis was conducted, examining 55 studies sourced from a systematic review, employing directed content analysis to clarify co-design principles and their applications. The research followed Mayring’s model for deductive category application, resulting in the development and testing of eight standard…
Exploring age-friendly urban design through co-creation
This study showcases a co-creative approach to urban design specifically tailored to meet the physical activity and socialization needs of older adults in Barcelona, Spain. It explores how older adults can be involved in the planning process of spaces that foster their physical and social activities. Utilizing a mixed-methods approach, the research facilitated a collaborative design effort that engaged older adults, community stakeholders, and re…
Navigating process evaluation in co-creation
Background Co-creation is seen as a way to ensure all relevant needs and perspectives are included and to increase its potential for beneficial effects and uptake process evaluation is crucial. However, existing process evaluation frameworks have been built on practices characterised by top-down developed and implemented interventions and may be limited in capturing essential elements of co-creation. This study aims to provide a review of studies…
Conducting co-creation for public health in low and middle-income countries
Enriching the evidence base of co-creation research in public health with methodological principles of critical realism
With the popularity of co-creation research in public health and other fields, there is a need to strengthen its evidence-base by developing a framework based on meta-theoretical principles. The lack of applying meta-theoretical principles in co-creation research impedes the theory-and evidence building. Critical realism seems a promising candidate for providing meta-theoretical principles to enrich the evidence base of co-creation research in pu…
No prominent works on this page.
Navigating process evaluation in co-creation
Background Co-creation is seen as a way to ensure all relevant needs and perspectives are included and to increase its potential for beneficial effects and uptake process evaluation is crucial. However, existing process evaluation frameworks have been built on practices characterised by top-down developed and implemented interventions and may be limited in capturing essential elements of co-creation. This study aims to provide a review of studies…
Conducting co-creation for public health in low and middle-income countries
Enriching the evidence base of co-creation research in public health with methodological principles of critical realism
With the popularity of co-creation research in public health and other fields, there is a need to strengthen its evidence-base by developing a framework based on meta-theoretical principles. The lack of applying meta-theoretical principles in co-creation research impedes the theory-and evidence building. Critical realism seems a promising candidate for providing meta-theoretical principles to enrich the evidence base of co-creation research in pu…
A realist inspired barriers and facilitators evaluation of the co-creation process in the Youth-centred Participatory Action Project
This study examined barriers and facilitators of the first phase of the co-creation process as part of the Youth-centred Participatory Action (YoPA) project, a multi-country co-creation initiative to address health inequities by engaging adolescents in Denmark, Nigeria, South Africa, and the Netherlands. Using a qualitative design informed by implementation science and realist thinking, we analysed data from 22 transcripts of semi-structured inte…
Establishing fundamental co-design principles and strategies for public health research practice
This study focuses on defining standard co-design principles and exploring strategies for their application in public health research. A secondary analysis was conducted, examining 55 studies sourced from a systematic review, employing directed content analysis to clarify co-design principles and their applications. The research followed Mayring’s model for deductive category application, resulting in the development and testing of eight standard…
Exploring age-friendly urban design through co-creation
This study showcases a co-creative approach to urban design specifically tailored to meet the physical activity and socialization needs of older adults in Barcelona, Spain. It explores how older adults can be involved in the planning process of spaces that foster their physical and social activities. Utilizing a mixed-methods approach, the research facilitated a collaborative design effort that engaged older adults, community stakeholders, and re…
Engineering (3 works) · Health Policy Implementation Science (3 works) · Medicine (3 works) · Mental Health and Patient Involvement (3 works) · Nursing (2 works) · Political science (2 works) · Public health (2 works) · Service and Product Innovation (2 works) · Action (physics) (1 work) · Architectural engineering (1 work)