Sonya Eremenco
Biographic Data
| ID | 7688651 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Sonya Eremenco |
| GIVEN NAMES | Sonya |
| FAMILY NAME | Eremenco |
| SIGNATURE | EREMENCO S |
| AFFILIATIONS | NorthShore University HealthSystem |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-3956-0235 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 11 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 11 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2000 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2022 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Comparing patient global impression of severity and patient global impression of change to evaluate test–retest reliability of depression, non-small cell lung cancer, and asthma measures
When considering anchor measures to identify a stable subgroup for test-retest reliability analyses, current state anchors perform better than retrospective anchors. Researchers should carefully consider the type of anchor selected, the time period covered, and should ensure anchor content is consistent with the target measure concept, as well as inclusion of both current and retrospective anchor measures
Assessing test–retest reliability of patient-reported outcome measures using intraclass correlation coefficients
Feedback was carefully considered and, after further deliberation, the proposed ICC formula was confirmed. In conclusion, to assess test-retest reliability for PRO measures, the two-way mixed-effect analysis of variance model with interaction for the absolute agreement between single scores is recommended
Korean Translation and Validation of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (Fact-L) Version 4
Korean Translation and Validity of Fact-BMT Version 4 and the Quality of Life in Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation Patients
A Comprehensive Method for the Translation and Cross-Cultural Validation of Health Status Questionnaires
The FACIT (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy) translation methodology has been in use for nearly 10 years and, during the course of that time, has emphasized a universal translation approach that includes multicountry review, the use of qualitative and quantitative methods in testing, and the exploration of new methods such as differential item functioning (DIF) analysis using item response theory to evaluate item equivalence. The …
Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures
Korean translation and validation of the functional assessment of cancer therapy-breast (Fact-B) scale version 4
The functional assessment of cancer therapy–BRM (Fact–BRM)
Quality of life in breast cancer patients
Cross-cultural validation of an international questionnaire, the General Measure of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale (Fact-G), for Japanese
Development of three African language translations of the Fact-G
No prominent works on this page.
Development of three African language translations of the Fact-G
Cross-cultural validation of an international questionnaire, the General Measure of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale (Fact-G), for Japanese
Quality of life in breast cancer patients
The functional assessment of cancer therapy–BRM (Fact–BRM)
A Comprehensive Method for the Translation and Cross-Cultural Validation of Health Status Questionnaires
The FACIT (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy) translation methodology has been in use for nearly 10 years and, during the course of that time, has emphasized a universal translation approach that includes multicountry review, the use of qualitative and quantitative methods in testing, and the exploration of new methods such as differential item functioning (DIF) analysis using item response theory to evaluate item equivalence. The …
Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures
Korean translation and validation of the functional assessment of cancer therapy-breast (Fact-B) scale version 4
Korean Translation and Validation of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (Fact-L) Version 4
Korean Translation and Validity of Fact-BMT Version 4 and the Quality of Life in Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation Patients
Assessing test–retest reliability of patient-reported outcome measures using intraclass correlation coefficients
Feedback was carefully considered and, after further deliberation, the proposed ICC formula was confirmed. In conclusion, to assess test-retest reliability for PRO measures, the two-way mixed-effect analysis of variance model with interaction for the absolute agreement between single scores is recommended
Comparing patient global impression of severity and patient global impression of change to evaluate test–retest reliability of depression, non-small cell lung cancer, and asthma measures
When considering anchor measures to identify a stable subgroup for test-retest reliability analyses, current state anchors perform better than retrospective anchors. Researchers should carefully consider the type of anchor selected, the time period covered, and should ensure anchor content is consistent with the target measure concept, as well as inclusion of both current and retrospective anchor measures
Medicine (10 works) · Psychometrics (9 works) · Cancer survivorship and care (8 works) · Clinical Psychology (8 works) · Cancer (6 works) · Clinical Psychology (6 works) · Internal Medicine (6 works) · Psychology (6 works) · Quality of life (healthcare (6 works) · Public health (5 works)