Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Andrew M LaBonte

Biographic Data

ID7718571
NAMEAndrew M LaBonte
GIVEN NAMESAndrew M
FAMILY NAMELaBonte
SIGNATURELABONTE A M
AFFILIATIONSConnecticut Department of Environmental Protection, Wildlife Division, North Franklin, Connecticut, USA
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS3
TOTAL CITATIONS0
WORKS AS AUTHOR3
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2017
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2018
H-INDEX0
  • Hunter use and satisfaction with telephone and internet harvest reporting systems

    Andrew M LaBonte, Howard J Kilpatrick•ARTICLE•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2018

    Deer (Odocoileus sp.) harvest data have been collected by wildlife managers using numerous methods, such as mandatory in-person check stations (IPC), mail questionnaires, mail-in harvest cards, tol

  • Harvest reporting compliance with telephone and Internet harvest reporting systems

    Andrew M LaBonte, Howard J Kilpatrick•ARTICLE•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2018

  • A State and Provincial Survey of Harvest Reporting and Data Collection Methods

    Andrew M LaBonte, Howard J Kilpatrick•ARTICLE•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2017

    This article explored state and provincial wildlife agency deer (Odocoileus sp.) harvest data collection methods (in-person check stations [IPC], postal mail, telephone, and Internet harvest reporting [IHR]), and agency opinions about using hunter-provided data in making sound management decisions. We conducted an Internet survey of all U.S. and Canadian wildlife agencies’ deer program coordinators to determine current methods used for harvest re…

No prominent works on this page.

  • A State and Provincial Survey of Harvest Reporting and Data Collection Methods

    Andrew M LaBonte, Howard J Kilpatrick•ARTICLE•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2017

    This article explored state and provincial wildlife agency deer (Odocoileus sp.) harvest data collection methods (in-person check stations [IPC], postal mail, telephone, and Internet harvest reporting [IHR]), and agency opinions about using hunter-provided data in making sound management decisions. We conducted an Internet survey of all U.S. and Canadian wildlife agencies’ deer program coordinators to determine current methods used for harvest re…

  • Hunter use and satisfaction with telephone and internet harvest reporting systems

    Andrew M LaBonte, Howard J Kilpatrick•ARTICLE•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2018

    Deer (Odocoileus sp.) harvest data have been collected by wildlife managers using numerous methods, such as mandatory in-person check stations (IPC), mail questionnaires, mail-in harvest cards, tol

  • Harvest reporting compliance with telephone and Internet harvest reporting systems

    Andrew M LaBonte, Howard J Kilpatrick•ARTICLE•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2018

Business (3 works) · Computer Science (3 works) · Marketing (3 works) · The Internet (3 works) · World Wide Web (3 works) · Geography (2 works) · Odocoileus (2 works) · Psychology (2 works) · Wildlife (2 works) · Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae