Lily C Taylor
Biographic Data
| ID | 7753531 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Lily C Taylor |
| GIVEN NAMES | Lily C |
| FAMILY NAME | Taylor |
| SIGNATURE | TAYLOR L C |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Cambridge |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-0832-9244 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 3 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2023 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2025 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Assessing the Quality of Community Jury Deliberations in Online and In‐Person Community Juries Using a Deductive Coding Framework
INTRODUCTION: Community juries require participants to engage in group deliberations, seeking to reach a consensus or verdict on the research question(s). Community juries have traditionally taken place in-person, although holding them online or in a hybrid format is increasingly common, particularly following the COVID-19 pandemic. In order for the community jury method to be used successfully, it is crucial to ensure that the goals of the delib…
Acceptability of risk stratification within population‐based cancer screening from the perspective of the general public: A mixed‐methods systematic review
Implementation of risk stratification within bowel cancer screening: A community jury study exploring public acceptability and communication needs
From the perspective of public acceptability, risk stratification using current data could be implemented immediately, ahead of more complex strategies. Collecting additional data for lifestyle and/or genetic risk assessment was also considered acceptable but the practicalities of collecting such data and how the programme would be communicated require careful consideration
No prominent works on this page.
Acceptability of risk stratification within population‐based cancer screening from the perspective of the general public: A mixed‐methods systematic review
Implementation of risk stratification within bowel cancer screening: A community jury study exploring public acceptability and communication needs
From the perspective of public acceptability, risk stratification using current data could be implemented immediately, ahead of more complex strategies. Collecting additional data for lifestyle and/or genetic risk assessment was also considered acceptable but the practicalities of collecting such data and how the programme would be communicated require careful consideration
Assessing the Quality of Community Jury Deliberations in Online and In‐Person Community Juries Using a Deductive Coding Framework
INTRODUCTION: Community juries require participants to engage in group deliberations, seeking to reach a consensus or verdict on the research question(s). Community juries have traditionally taken place in-person, although holding them online or in a hybrid format is increasingly common, particularly following the COVID-19 pandemic. In order for the community jury method to be used successfully, it is crucial to ensure that the goals of the delib…
Biostatistics (1 works) · Cancer (1 works) · Cancer screening (1 works) · Colonoscopy (1 works) · Colorectal cancer (1 works) · Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (1 works) · Environmental health (1 works) · Expert finding and Q&A systems (1 works) · Family medicine (1 works) · Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (1 works)