Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Charles Clifton

Biographic Data

ID779915
NAMECharles Clifton
GIVEN NAMESCharles
FAMILY NAMEClifton
SIGNATURECLIFTON C
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst
ORCID0000-0001-5505-5330
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS47
TOTAL CITATIONS204
AUTHOR COUNT47
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1924
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2022
H-INDEX9
  • Interpreting Adjuncts: Processing English As- Clauses

    Open Access•Lyn Frazier, Charles Clifton•ARTICLE•Language and Speech•2022•References: 24

    Four experiments probed the interpretation of sentence-final as-clauses (e.g., Close the book as a librarian would/would do) ambiguous between a manner interpretation and a “propositional” interpretation. Experiment 1, an interpretation study, found a predominance of manner interpretations for sentences containing would and would do as the elliptical predicate inside the as-clause, biased by which form participants were initially exposed to. In E…

  • Tense and Discourse Structure: The Timeline Hypothesis

    Alexander Göbel, Lyn Frazier et al.•ARTICLE•Discourse Processes•2021•References: 16

    Recent studies of appositives have turned up differences between sentence-medial appositives and sentence-final appositives, for instance, in their availability for discourse continuations. Three experiments investigated whether medial appositives are more difficult to comprehend than final appositives and if so why. Experiment 1 tested coordinating (Narration) versus subordinating (Elaboration) discourse relations in sentence-medial or sentence-…

  • Negative clauses imply affirmative topics and affirmative antecedents

    Open Access•Charles Clifton, Lyn Frazier et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Psycholinguistic…•2021•Cited by: 1•References: 15

  • Domain Restriction in Generic Statements

    Charles Clifton, Lyn Frazier•ARTICLE•Discourse Processes•2020•References: 1

    Domain restriction is a pervasive if often neglected part of discourse comprehension. Speakers and authors implicitly limit the domain of discourse of quantifiers (e.g., everyone) and noun phrases (e.g., the girls). Our previous research shows that an initial temporal or locative prepositional phrase (PP), which introduces a topic situation, is the preferred context for interpreting the domain of subject noun phrases in the same sentence or a sub…

  • A Note on the Voice Mismatch Asymmetry in Ellipsis

    Open Access•Charles Clifton, Ming Xiang et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Psycholinguistic…•2019•Cited by: 1•References: 17

  • A consensus-based transparency checklist

    Open Access•Balazs Aczel, Barnabas Szaszi et al.•ARTICLE•Nature Human Behaviour•2019•Cited by: 4•References: 8

    We present a consensus-based checklist to improve and document the transparency of research reports in social and behavioural research. An accompanying online application allows users to complete the form and generate a report that they can submit with their manuscript or post to a public repository

  • Author Correction: A consensus-based transparency checklist

    Open Access•Balazs Aczel, Barnabas Szaszi et al.•ARTICLE•Nature Human Behaviour•2019

    An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper

  • Context Effects in Discourse: The Question Under Discussion

    Charles Clifton, Lyn Frazier•ARTICLE•Discourse Processes•2018•Cited by: 1•References: 19

    Linguistic analyses of the Question Under Discussion (QUD) provide an interesting extension to Tony Sanford’s work on discourse coherence (e.g., Sanford & Emmott, 2012). The QUD approach claims that discourse is organized by a series of overt and covert questions and answers to, or comments on, them. In a coherent discourse, material that addresses the current QUD receives focus, and its processing is facilitated. After a brief review of the exis…

  • Together They Stand: Interpreting Not-At-Issue Content

    Open Access•Lyn Frazier, Bronwyn Dillon et al.•ARTICLE•Language and Speech•2018•Cited by: 1•References: 23

    Potts unified the account of appositives, parentheticals, expressives, and honorifics as 'Not- At-Issue’ (NAI) content, treating them as a natural class semantically in behaving like root (unembedded) structures, typically expressing speaker commitments, and being interpreted independently of At-Issue content. We propose that NAI content expresses a complete speech act distinct from the speech act of the containing utterance. The speech act hypot…

  • Anticipating Negation: The Dos and Don'ts of Neg Raising

    Open Access•Lyn Frazier, Charles Clifton et al.•ARTICLE•Syntax•2018•References: 26

    AbsractA sentence like (i) can often be used interchangeably with (ii). I don't think it's raining. I think it's not raining. With particular matrix predicates (e.g., think, seem, be probable) the negation from a complement clause may appear in the matrix clause, according to syntactic accounts, owing to a rule of Neg Raising, or according to semantic accounts, owing to a cancelable presupposition of the Excluded Middle (I believe p or I believe …

  • Which noun phrases is the verb supposed to agree with: Object agreement in American English

    Open Access•Bronwyn Dillon, Brian Dillon et al.•ARTICLE•Language•2017•Cited by: 2

    We investigate a noncanonical agreement pattern in American English in which a fronted WH-phrase appears to control agreement on an inflected auxiliary, as in Which flowers are the gardener planting? (Kimball & Aissen 1971). We explore this phenomenon with five acceptability- judgment experiments and interpret the resulting data with the aid of a quantitative model of the judgment process. Our study suggests that fronted WH-phrases interfere with…

  • Focus in Corrective Exchanges: Effects of Pitch Accent and Syntactic Form

    Open Access•Charles Clifton, Lyn Frazier•ARTICLE•Language and Speech•2016•Cited by: 2•References: 39

    A dialog consisting of an utterance by one speaker and another speaker’s correction of its content seems intuitively to be made more acceptable when the new information is pitch accented or otherwise focused, and when the utterance and correction have the same syntactic form. Three acceptability judgment studies, one written and two auditory, investigated the interaction of focus (manipulated by sentence position and, in Experiments 2 and 3, pitc…

  • Sentence Comprehension, Psychology of

    Open Access•Charles Clifton•CHAPTER•International Encyclopedia of the…•2015

  • Relative clause attachment in German, English, Spanish and French: Effects of position and length

    Open Access•Barbara Hemforth, Susana Fernandez et al.•ARTICLE•Lingua•2015•Cited by: 9•References: 39

  • Partition If You Must: Evidence for a No Extra Times Principle

    Charles Clifton, Lyn Frazier•ARTICLE•Discourse Processes•2013•References: 14

    Plural phrases are open to many interpretations in English, where cumulative interpretations of noun and verb phrases are possible without any disambiguating morphology. A sentence like Every week, the high school kids went to the movies or the ballgame might involve quantifying over multiple occurrences of a single scenario, in which subsets of the kids do different things, or it might involve quantifying over distinct scenarios, in which all of…

  • Language Comprehension and ProductionPreparation of this chapter was supported by NIH Grant HD051610 to R.T. and NIH Grant HD18708 to C.C. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and…

    Open Access•Charles Clifton, Andrea S Meyer et al.•OTHER•Handbook of Psychology, Second…•2012

    To produce and comprehend words and sentences, people use their knowledge of language structure; their knowledge of the situation they are in, including the previous discourse and the local situation; and their cognitive abilities, including memory, attention, and motor control. In this chapter, we explore how competent adult language users bring such knowledge and abilities to bear on the tasks of comprehending spoken and written language and pr…

  • Quantifiers Undone: Reversing Predictable Speech Errors in Comprehension

    Open Access•Lyn Frazier, Charles Clifton•ARTICLE•Language•2011•Cited by: 6

    Speakers predictably make errors during spontaneous speech. Listeners may identify such errors and repair the input, or their analysis of the input, accordingly. Two written questionnaire studies investigated error compensation mechanisms in sentences with doubled quantifiers such as Many students often turn in their assignments late . Results show a considerable number of undoubled interpretations for all items tested (though fewer for sentences…

  • Embedded implicatures observed: A comment on Geurts and Pouscoulous (2009)

    Open Access•Charles Clifton, Chad Dube•ARTICLE•Semantics and Pragmatics•2010

    Conventionalist theories of scalar implicature differ from other accounts in that they predict strengthening of embedded scalar terms. Geurts and Pouscoulous (2009) argue that experimental support for this prediction is largely based on sentence comprehension tasks that inflate the frequency with which terms like some are strengthened. Using a picture verification task, they observed no strengthening of embedded scalars. We present data from a mu…

  • Teaching and Learning Guide for: Parallelism and Competition in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution

    Open Access•Charles Clifton, Charles Clifton Jr et al.•ARTICLE•Language and Linguistics Compass•2010

    This guide accompanies the following article : Charles Clifton Jr and Adrian Staub, ‘Parallelism and Competition in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution’, Language and Linguistics Compass 2 (2008): 234–250, doi: 10.1111/j.1749‐818x.2008.00055.x Introduction Two metaphors have dominated cognitive psychology throughout its history: ‘activation’ and ‘computation’. Activation (itself metaphorically based on neural firing rate) assumes that representations …

  • Processing syntax and morphology: A neurocognitive perspective

    Open Access•Charles Clifton•ARTICLE•Language•2010

  • When are Downward-Entailing Contexts Identified? The Case of the Domain Widener Ever

    Charles Clifton, Lyn Frazier•ARTICLE•Linguistic Inquiry•2010•Cited by: 1•References: 9

    October 01 2010 When are Downward-Entailing Contexts Identified? The Case of the Domain Widener Ever In Special Collection: CogNet Charles Clifton, Jr., Charles Clifton, Jr. University of Massachusetts, Amherst Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Lyn Frazier Lyn Frazier University of Massachusetts, Amherst Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Author and Article Information Charles Clift…

  • Imperfect Ellipsis: Antecedents beyond Syntax

    Open Access•Charles Clifton, Charles E Clifton Jr et al.•ARTICLE•Syntax•2010•Cited by: 2•References: 21

    Ellipsis is subject to both syntactic and discourse conditions. Here we explore the discourse condition that favors antecedents that are part of the main assertion of an utterance. We argue that the main assertion tendency is best captured in the processor, not the grammar. Two experiments test verb-phrase ellipsis examples with antecedents in a conditional. One suggests that, because of the main assertion tendency, a reader considers full condit…

  • How prosody constrains comprehension: A limited effect of prosodic packaging

    Open Access•Katy Carlson, Lyn Frazier et al.•ARTICLE•Lingua•2009•Cited by: 5•References: 31

  • Parallelism and Competition in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution

    Open Access•Charles Clifton, Adrian Staub•ARTICLE•Language and Linguistics Compass•2008•Cited by: 3•References: 48

    A central issue in sentence-processing research is whether the parser entertains multiple analyses of syntactically ambiguous input in parallel, and whether these analyses compete for selection. In this article, we review theoretical positions for and against such competitive parallelism. We then review empirical evidence, primarily drawing on reading time studies, bearing on the prediction made by parallel competitive models that some cost ought…

  • Eye movements in reading words and sentences

    Charles Clifton, Adrian Staub et al.•CHAPTER•EYE MOVEMENTS: A WINDOW ON MIND…•2007

Next
  • Focus, Accent, and Argument Structure: Effects on Language Comprehension

    Open Access•Stacy Birch, Charles Clifton•ARTICLE•Language and Speech•1995•Cited by: 25•References: 5

    Four experiments investigated the effect of syntactic argument structure on the evaluation and comprehension of utterances with different patterns of pitch accents. Linguistic analyses of the relation between focus and prosody note that it is possible for certain accented constituents within a broadly focused phrase to project focus to the entire phrase. We manipulated focus requirements and accent in recorded question-answer pairs and asked list…

  • The syntax-discourse divide: Processing Ellipsis

    Open Access•Lyn Frazier, Charles Clifton•ARTICLE•Syntax•2005•Cited by: 20•References: 44

    VP-ellipsis and sluicing are forms of ellipsis that can cross a sentence boundary. We present a series of comprehension studies on these forms of ellipsis to elucidate their processing and the relation of syntactic and discourse processing. One set of studies examines the hypothesis that the representation of elided material is syntactically structured. We present evidence supporting the hypothesis and tentatively attribute the effects to sharing…

  • Informative Prosodic Boundaries

    Open Access•Charles Clifton, Katy Carlson et al.•ARTICLE•Language and Speech•2002•Cited by: 15•References: 22

    In principle, a prosodic boundary in an utterance might affect its interpretation in a local, context-independent fashion. In a right-branching language like English, the presence of a large prosodic boundary might signal the end of the current constituent, requiring the following constituent to be attached high in the syntactic tree. We present three listening experiments that test an alternative position suggested in Carlson, Clifton, and Frazi…

  • Amnestying Superiority Violations: Processing Multiple Questions

    Charles Clifton, Gisbert Fanselow et al.•ARTICLE•Linguistic Inquiry•2006•Cited by: 13•References: 1

    Two experiments investigated the acceptability of multiple questions. As expected, sentences violating the Superiority Condition were accepted less often than sentences obeying it.The status of the Superiority violations was not improved by the addition of a third wh, regardless of whether the third wh was an adjunct or an argument, though it was improved by the addition of a second question (e.g., and when).Further, in a small pilot study direct…

  • Parsing Coordinates and Ellipsis: Copy α

    Open Access•Lyn Frazier, Charles Clifton et al.•ARTICLE•Syntax•2001•Cited by: 13

    In this paper we argue that the human parsing mechanism has available two distinct methods of building syntactic structure. One mechanism, which has been studied extensively, involves building structure in response to the input in a step-by-step, inference-by-inference manner. Building more structure by this means involves more processing cost than building less structure. The second mechanism, proposed here, involves essentially cost-free copyin…

  • Relative Clause Interpretation Preferences in Spanish and English

    Open Access•Manuel Carreiras, Charles Clifton•ARTICLE•Language and Speech•1993•Cited by: 13•References: 9

    Five experiments measured reading time for Spanish and English sentences containing a complex NP followed by a relative clause (e.g., ... “the daughter of the colonel who had an accident”). As has been previously reported, Spanish sentences were read more rapidly when the content of the relative clause forced it to modify the first of the two NPs in the complex NP (“the daughter”) than when it modified the second NP (“the colonel”). Their English…

  • Construal: Overview, Motivation, and Some New Evidence

    Open Access•Lyn Frazier, Charles Clifton•ARTICLE•Journal of Psycholinguistic…•1997•Cited by: 10•References: 13

  • Relative clause attachment in German, English, Spanish and French: Effects of position and length

    Open Access•Barbara Hemforth, Susana Fernandez et al.•ARTICLE•Lingua•2015•Cited by: 9•References: 39

  • Processing Coordinate Structures

    Open Access•Lyn Frazier, Alan Munn et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Psycholinguistic…•2000•Cited by: 9•References: 11

  • The use of syntactic information in filling gaps

    Open Access•Charles Clifton, Lyn Frazier•ARTICLE•Journal of Psycholinguistic…•1986•Cited by: 9•References: 4

  • Verb frame preferences: Descriptive norms

    Open Access•Cynthia M Connine, Cynthia Connine et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Psycholinguistic…•1984•Cited by: 9•References: 3

  • On Bound Variable Interpretations: The LF-Only Hypothesis

    Open Access•Lyn Frazier, Charles Clifton•ARTICLE•Journal of Psycholinguistic…•2000•Cited by: 8•References: 10

  • Don't break, or do

    Open Access•Lyn Frazier, Charles Clifton et al.•ARTICLE•Lingua•2004•Cited by: 7•References: 8

  • Quantifiers Undone: Reversing Predictable Speech Errors in Comprehension

    Open Access•Lyn Frazier, Charles Clifton•ARTICLE•Language•2011•Cited by: 6

    Speakers predictably make errors during spontaneous speech. Listeners may identify such errors and repair the input, or their analysis of the input, accordingly. Two written questionnaire studies investigated error compensation mechanisms in sentences with doubled quantifiers such as Many students often turn in their assignments late . Results show a considerable number of undoubled interpretations for all items tested (though fewer for sentences…

  • Processing "d-Linked" Phrases

    Open Access•Lyn Frazier, Charles Clifton•ARTICLE•Journal of Psycholinguistic…•2002•Cited by: 6•References: 13

  • Focus and the Interpretation of Pitch Accent: Disambiguating Embedded Questions

    Open Access•Amy J Schafer, Amy Schafer et al.•ARTICLE•Language and Speech•2000•Cited by: 6•References: 14

    It has been suggested that prosodic disambiguation of sentences is largely a matter of prosodic phrasing. Ambiguities can be resolved if a prosodic break aligns with a major syntactic boundary of one structure but not another. The placement of pitch accents is viewed as playing only a supporting role (cf. Price, Ostendorf, Shattuck-Huffnagel, & Fong, 1991). This view of prosodic disambiguation does not apply tho all structures of a language. We r…

  • How prosody constrains comprehension: A limited effect of prosodic packaging

    Open Access•Katy Carlson, Lyn Frazier et al.•ARTICLE•Lingua•2009•Cited by: 5•References: 31

  • A consensus-based transparency checklist

    Open Access•Balazs Aczel, Barnabas Szaszi et al.•ARTICLE•Nature Human Behaviour•2019•Cited by: 4•References: 8

    We present a consensus-based checklist to improve and document the transparency of research reports in social and behavioural research. An accompanying online application allows users to complete the form and generate a report that they can submit with their manuscript or post to a public repository

  • Parallelism and Competition in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution

    Open Access•Charles Clifton, Adrian Staub•ARTICLE•Language and Linguistics Compass•2008•Cited by: 3•References: 48

    A central issue in sentence-processing research is whether the parser entertains multiple analyses of syntactically ambiguous input in parallel, and whether these analyses compete for selection. In this article, we review theoretical positions for and against such competitive parallelism. We then review empirical evidence, primarily drawing on reading time studies, bearing on the prediction made by parallel competitive models that some cost ought…

  • Which noun phrases is the verb supposed to agree with: Object agreement in American English

    Open Access•Bronwyn Dillon, Brian Dillon et al.•ARTICLE•Language•2017•Cited by: 2

    We investigate a noncanonical agreement pattern in American English in which a fronted WH-phrase appears to control agreement on an inflected auxiliary, as in Which flowers are the gardener planting? (Kimball & Aissen 1971). We explore this phenomenon with five acceptability- judgment experiments and interpret the resulting data with the aid of a quantitative model of the judgment process. Our study suggests that fronted WH-phrases interfere with…

  • Focus in Corrective Exchanges: Effects of Pitch Accent and Syntactic Form

    Open Access•Charles Clifton, Lyn Frazier•ARTICLE•Language and Speech•2016•Cited by: 2•References: 39

    A dialog consisting of an utterance by one speaker and another speaker’s correction of its content seems intuitively to be made more acceptable when the new information is pitch accented or otherwise focused, and when the utterance and correction have the same syntactic form. Three acceptability judgment studies, one written and two auditory, investigated the interaction of focus (manipulated by sentence position and, in Experiments 2 and 3, pitc…

  • Imperfect Ellipsis: Antecedents beyond Syntax

    Open Access•Charles Clifton, Charles E Clifton Jr et al.•ARTICLE•Syntax•2010•Cited by: 2•References: 21

    Ellipsis is subject to both syntactic and discourse conditions. Here we explore the discourse condition that favors antecedents that are part of the main assertion of an utterance. We argue that the main assertion tendency is best captured in the processor, not the grammar. Two experiments test verb-phrase ellipsis examples with antecedents in a conditional. One suggests that, because of the main assertion tendency, a reader considers full condit…

  • Focus and VP Ellipsis

    Open Access•Lyn Frazier, Charles Clifton et al.•ARTICLE•Language and Speech•2007•Cited by: 2•References: 27

    In spoken English, pitch accents can convey the focus associated with new or contrasted constituents. Two listening experiments were conducted to determine whether accenting a subject makes its predicate a more tempting antecedent for an elided verb phrase, presumably because the accent helps focus the subject of the antecedent clause, increasing its likelihood of contrasting with the subject of the elided clause. The results of Experiment 1 supp…

  • Negative clauses imply affirmative topics and affirmative antecedents

    Open Access•Charles Clifton, Lyn Frazier et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Psycholinguistic…•2021•Cited by: 1•References: 15

  • A Note on the Voice Mismatch Asymmetry in Ellipsis

    Open Access•Charles Clifton, Ming Xiang et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Psycholinguistic…•2019•Cited by: 1•References: 17

  • The Economic Future of the Automobile Industry

    Open Access•Charles Clifton•ARTICLE•The Annals of the American…•1924

  • Identification of Relevant Intra-Maze Cues in Latent Learning

    Open Access•Charles Clifton, Kirk H Smith et al.•ARTICLE•Psychological Reports•1964

    A modification of Seward's (1949) procedure was used to demonstrate latent learning in a diamond maze, in which extra-maze cues are made irrelevant by having the positive and negative goal boxes adjacent. In a series of experiments, 55 of 60 rats made correct test trial choices. When the cues from visually distinctive areas halfway down the paths to the goal boxes were eliminated, only 15 of 30 Ss chose correctly. It was concluded that these visu…

  • Verb frame preferences: Descriptive norms

    Open Access•Cynthia M Connine, Cynthia Connine et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Psycholinguistic…•1984•Cited by: 9•References: 3

  • The independence of syntactic processing

    Open Access•Fernanda Ferreira, Charles Clifton•ARTICLE•Journal of Memory and Language•1986

  • The use of syntactic information in filling gaps

    Open Access•Charles Clifton, Lyn Frazier•ARTICLE•Journal of Psycholinguistic…•1986•Cited by: 9•References: 4

  • Successive cyclicity in the grammar and the parser

    Lyn Frazier, Charles Clifton•ARTICLE•Language and Cognitive Processes•1989

    Four experiments studied the comprehension of sentences with relations between empty positions and phrases displaced from these positions (“gaps” and 'fillers). Evidence from self-paced reading and end-of-sentence acceptability judgement tasks confirms previous research indicating that the parser prefers to assign an identified filler as the argument of a verb immediately, rather than waiting to check the input for a lexical item of the expected …

  • Language: An Invitation to Cognitive Science. Vol. 1

    Open Access•Charles Clifton•ARTICLE•Language and Speech•1990

  • Relative Clause Interpretation Preferences in Spanish and English

    Open Access•Manuel Carreiras, Charles Clifton•ARTICLE•Language and Speech•1993•Cited by: 13•References: 9

    Five experiments measured reading time for Spanish and English sentences containing a complex NP followed by a relative clause (e.g., ... “the daughter of the colonel who had an accident”). As has been previously reported, Spanish sentences were read more rapidly when the content of the relative clause forced it to modify the first of the two NPs in the complex NP (“the daughter”) than when it modified the second NP (“the colonel”). Their English…

  • Focus, Accent, and Argument Structure: Effects on Language Comprehension

    Open Access•Stacy Birch, Charles Clifton•ARTICLE•Language and Speech•1995•Cited by: 25•References: 5

    Four experiments investigated the effect of syntactic argument structure on the evaluation and comprehension of utterances with different patterns of pitch accents. Linguistic analyses of the relation between focus and prosody note that it is possible for certain accented constituents within a broadly focused phrase to project focus to the entire phrase. We manipulated focus requirements and accent in recorded question-answer pairs and asked list…

  • Construal: Overview, Motivation, and Some New Evidence

    Open Access•Lyn Frazier, Charles Clifton•ARTICLE•Journal of Psycholinguistic…•1997•Cited by: 10•References: 13

  • Focus and the Interpretation of Pitch Accent: Disambiguating Embedded Questions

    Open Access•Amy J Schafer, Amy Schafer et al.•ARTICLE•Language and Speech•2000•Cited by: 6•References: 14

    It has been suggested that prosodic disambiguation of sentences is largely a matter of prosodic phrasing. Ambiguities can be resolved if a prosodic break aligns with a major syntactic boundary of one structure but not another. The placement of pitch accents is viewed as playing only a supporting role (cf. Price, Ostendorf, Shattuck-Huffnagel, & Fong, 1991). This view of prosodic disambiguation does not apply tho all structures of a language. We r…

  • On Bound Variable Interpretations: The LF-Only Hypothesis

    Open Access•Lyn Frazier, Charles Clifton•ARTICLE•Journal of Psycholinguistic…•2000•Cited by: 8•References: 10

  • Processing Coordinate Structures

    Open Access•Lyn Frazier, Alan Munn et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Psycholinguistic…•2000•Cited by: 9•References: 11

  • Parsing Coordinates and Ellipsis: Copy α

    Open Access•Lyn Frazier, Charles Clifton et al.•ARTICLE•Syntax•2001•Cited by: 13

    In this paper we argue that the human parsing mechanism has available two distinct methods of building syntactic structure. One mechanism, which has been studied extensively, involves building structure in response to the input in a step-by-step, inference-by-inference manner. Building more structure by this means involves more processing cost than building less structure. The second mechanism, proposed here, involves essentially cost-free copyin…

  • Informative Prosodic Boundaries

    Open Access•Charles Clifton, Katy Carlson et al.•ARTICLE•Language and Speech•2002•Cited by: 15•References: 22

    In principle, a prosodic boundary in an utterance might affect its interpretation in a local, context-independent fashion. In a right-branching language like English, the presence of a large prosodic boundary might signal the end of the current constituent, requiring the following constituent to be attached high in the syntactic tree. We present three listening experiments that test an alternative position suggested in Carlson, Clifton, and Frazi…

  • Processing "d-Linked" Phrases

    Open Access•Lyn Frazier, Charles Clifton•ARTICLE•Journal of Psycholinguistic…•2002•Cited by: 6•References: 13

  • Don't break, or do

    Open Access•Lyn Frazier, Charles Clifton et al.•ARTICLE•Lingua•2004•Cited by: 7•References: 8

  • Interface Problems: Structural Constraints on Interpretation

    Open Access•Lyn Frazier, Charles Clifton et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Psycholinguistic…•2005•References: 19

  • The syntax-discourse divide: Processing Ellipsis

    Open Access•Lyn Frazier, Charles Clifton•ARTICLE•Syntax•2005•Cited by: 20•References: 44

    VP-ellipsis and sluicing are forms of ellipsis that can cross a sentence boundary. We present a series of comprehension studies on these forms of ellipsis to elucidate their processing and the relation of syntactic and discourse processing. One set of studies examines the hypothesis that the representation of elided material is syntactically structured. We present evidence supporting the hypothesis and tentatively attribute the effects to sharing…

  • Amnestying Superiority Violations: Processing Multiple Questions

    Charles Clifton, Gisbert Fanselow et al.•ARTICLE•Linguistic Inquiry•2006•Cited by: 13•References: 1

    Two experiments investigated the acceptability of multiple questions. As expected, sentences violating the Superiority Condition were accepted less often than sentences obeying it.The status of the Superiority violations was not improved by the addition of a third wh, regardless of whether the third wh was an adjunct or an argument, though it was improved by the addition of a second question (e.g., and when).Further, in a small pilot study direct…

  • Eye movements in reading words and sentences

    Charles Clifton, Adrian Staub et al.•CHAPTER•EYE MOVEMENTS: A WINDOW ON MIND…•2007

  • Processing Inferential Causal Statements: Theoretical Refinements and the Role of Verb Type

    Mohamed Taha Mohamed, Charles Clifton•ARTICLE•Discourse Processes•2007•Cited by: 1•References: 3

    An evidential causal relation like, “Because most distinguished students got bad grades, the teacher made some mistakes in evaluating his students' papers,” is more difficult to process than a factual one like, “Because he got tired after a long semester, the teacher made some mistakes in evaluating his students' papers” (Noordman & de Blijzer, 2000 Noordman, L. and de Blijzer, F. 2000. “On the processing of causal relations”. In Cause, condition…

  • Focus and VP Ellipsis

    Open Access•Lyn Frazier, Charles Clifton et al.•ARTICLE•Language and Speech•2007•Cited by: 2•References: 27

    In spoken English, pitch accents can convey the focus associated with new or contrasted constituents. Two listening experiments were conducted to determine whether accenting a subject makes its predicate a more tempting antecedent for an elided verb phrase, presumably because the accent helps focus the subject of the antecedent clause, increasing its likelihood of contrasting with the subject of the elided clause. The results of Experiment 1 supp…

  • Parallelism and Competition in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution

    Open Access•Charles Clifton, Adrian Staub•ARTICLE•Language and Linguistics Compass•2008•Cited by: 3•References: 48

    A central issue in sentence-processing research is whether the parser entertains multiple analyses of syntactically ambiguous input in parallel, and whether these analyses compete for selection. In this article, we review theoretical positions for and against such competitive parallelism. We then review empirical evidence, primarily drawing on reading time studies, bearing on the prediction made by parallel competitive models that some cost ought…

  • How prosody constrains comprehension: A limited effect of prosodic packaging

    Open Access•Katy Carlson, Lyn Frazier et al.•ARTICLE•Lingua•2009•Cited by: 5•References: 31

Computer Science (39 works) · Linguistics (38 works) · Psychology (38 works) · Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (30 works) · Philosophy (27 works) · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (27 works) · Sentence (25 works) · Natural language processing (22 works) · Artificial Intelligence (15 works) · Artificial Intelligence (15 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae