Rong Kang

Biographic Data

ID7873931
NAMERong Kang
GIVEN NAMESRong
FAMILY NAMEKang
SIGNATUREKANG R
AFFILIATIONSShanghai University of Finance and Economics
ORCID0000-0001-5998-492X
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS5
TOTAL CITATIONS0
WORKS AS AUTHOR5
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2009
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2024
H-INDEX0

  • A two-step guessing game

    Open AccessKing King Li, Kang Rong et al.ARTICLETheory and Decision2024

  • Analysis of the Coupling Effect and Space-Time Difference between China’s Digital Economy Development and Carbon Emissions Reduction

    Open AccessNan Li, Beibei Shi et al.ARTICLEInternational Journal of…2023

    Previously conducted studies have established that the digital economy has a one-way inhibition effect on carbon emissions. Against this background, this paper aims to analyze the coordinated development effect of the interaction between the digital economy and carbon emissions reduction. The entropy weight method, coupling and coordination degree model, Dagum Gini coefficient and Moran's I index have been carried out as research methods in this …

  • Intelligent Manufacturing and Carbon Emissions Reduction

    Open AccessHao Lv, Beibei Shi et al.ARTICLEInternational Journal of…2022

    Driven by the information technology revolution, using artificial intelligence to promote intelligent manufacturing while achieving carbon emissions reduction is increasingly the focus of international attention. Given this, based on the fact that China's industrial manufacturing is more intelligent, this paper uses industrial sector data and robot data from 2000 to 2017 to examine the impact of intelligent manufacturing on industrial carbon diox…

  • Impact of second-order uncertainty on the efficiency of the 0.5-double auction

    Open AccessKang Rong, Rong KangARTICLEMathematical Social Sciences2013References: 5

  • Longitudinal Perspectives

    Fu-xi Fang, Wellman Henry M et al.ARTICLEActa Psychologica Sinica2009

    摘要: 本文作者前不久完成的一项横断设计研究中, 以自编的心理理论量表测查比较了中美两国3~5岁儿童的有关发展。量表包括五项任务: (1) 不同的愿望; (2) 知与不知; (3) 不同的信念; (4) 内容错误信念和 (5) 伪装的情绪。研究发现两种不同文化群体儿童对上述任务的理解均表现出稳定一致的发展次序, 两者的次序大致相同但具有重要差别: 我国儿童的理解次序如从易到难排列如上所列, 这一次序与美国儿童的差别在于我国儿童先理解“知与不知”, 然后是“不同的信念”, 而美国儿童则恰好相反。这一研究结果对了解不同文化儿童心理理论的发展次序是十分有意义的, 但问题是经由横断设计的量表研究所确立的发展次序能否准确地描述个体儿童的纵向进展呢? 为此本研究使用了相同的测量工具对参加过横断研究的北京3岁儿童(时间1)在他们4岁(时间2)和5岁(时间3)时进行了焦点追踪研究。研究结果表明, 随着测查时间的 延伸, 个体儿童的作业成绩不仅逐步提高, 而且这种提高符合量表任务的发展次序。通过应用格特曼…