Rashné Limki
Biographic Data
| ID | 796284 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Rashné Limki |
| GIVEN NAMES | Rashné |
| FAMILY NAME | Limki |
| SIGNATURE | LIMKI R |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Edinburgh Business School, Edinburgh, UK |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-6148-0277 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 4 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 9 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 4 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2017 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2023 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Thinking Coloniality with Hua and Ray
Race difference and power
None of the authors have a conflict of interest to disclose
Representing subjugation
This paper interrogates the reparative possibilities of representing subjugated voices in historical narratives. It examines, first, the onto-epistemic conditions under which this representation becomes possible. Further, it demonstrates that the possibility of representation is contingent upon the reproduction of the subjugated subject as a signifier of onto-epistemic difference. This form of representation fails to repair the harm underlying su…
On the coloniality of work
Relations of domination and subjugation in work manifest as class differentiation, but, more crucially, become intensified along lines of gender, sexual and racial difference. This circumstance, I suggest, is neither accidental nor incidental. It is a historical effect of colonial logic that postulates gender, sexual and racial Others as ontologically, and hence ethically, different. The articulation of difference as such legitimizes gender, sexu…
On the coloniality of work
Relations of domination and subjugation in work manifest as class differentiation, but, more crucially, become intensified along lines of gender, sexual and racial difference. This circumstance, I suggest, is neither accidental nor incidental. It is a historical effect of colonial logic that postulates gender, sexual and racial Others as ontologically, and hence ethically, different. The articulation of difference as such legitimizes gender, sexu…
Representing subjugation
This paper interrogates the reparative possibilities of representing subjugated voices in historical narratives. It examines, first, the onto-epistemic conditions under which this representation becomes possible. Further, it demonstrates that the possibility of representation is contingent upon the reproduction of the subjugated subject as a signifier of onto-epistemic difference. This form of representation fails to repair the harm underlying su…
On the coloniality of work
Relations of domination and subjugation in work manifest as class differentiation, but, more crucially, become intensified along lines of gender, sexual and racial difference. This circumstance, I suggest, is neither accidental nor incidental. It is a historical effect of colonial logic that postulates gender, sexual and racial Others as ontologically, and hence ethically, different. The articulation of difference as such legitimizes gender, sexu…
Representing subjugation
This paper interrogates the reparative possibilities of representing subjugated voices in historical narratives. It examines, first, the onto-epistemic conditions under which this representation becomes possible. Further, it demonstrates that the possibility of representation is contingent upon the reproduction of the subjugated subject as a signifier of onto-epistemic difference. This form of representation fails to repair the harm underlying su…
Race difference and power
None of the authors have a conflict of interest to disclose
Thinking Coloniality with Hua and Ray
Sociology (3 works) · Gender Studies (2 works) · Gender Studies (2 works) · History (2 works) · Philosophy (2 works) · Political science (2 works) · Psychology (2 works) · Work (physics (2 works) · Accidental (1 work) · African Sexualities and LGBTQ+ Issues (1 work)