Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Vicki Carstens

Biographic Data

ID809912
NAMEVicki Carstens
GIVEN NAMESVicki
FAMILY NAMECarstens
SIGNATURECARSTENS V
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Missouri
ORCID0000-0002-6189-6950
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS16
TOTAL CITATIONS240
AUTHOR COUNT16
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1997
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2026
H-INDEX8
  • The grammar of gender: Insights from Bantu asymmetries of AGR with conjoined subjects

    Open Access•Vicki Carstens•ARTICLE•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2026

  • Nguni Bare Nouns: Licensing without Case

    Vicki Carstens•ARTICLE•Linguistic Inquiry•2025•References: 65

    Nguni bare or augmentless ([−A]) nominals are licit only as strict negative dependents and wh-words. They may not appear in a preverbal subject position unless local to a negation-licensed [−A] complementizer of a subjunctive clause (Pietraszko 2021). This pattern motivates an analysis in terms of negative concord and a labeling theory approach to the Extended Projection Principle (EPP) (Chomsky 2013): [−A] nouns have uninterpretable negation fea…

  • Only' in Nguni: A Phrase-Final Particle Meets Antisymmetry Theory

    Vicki Carstens, Jochen Zeller•ARTICLE•Linguistic Inquiry•2020•Cited by: 2•References: 28

    This article investigates the syntax of the phrase-final focus particles kuphela and qha 'only' in Zulu and Xhosa (Nguni; Bantu). We show that kuphela's and qha's associations with a focused constituent respect the complex topography of information structure in Nguni and, like English only, a surface c-command requirement. However, unlike English only, the Zulu and Xhosa particles typically follow the focus associate they c-command, a fact that p…

  • Noun‐to‐Determiner Movement

    Open Access•Vicki Carstens•OTHER•The Wiley Blackwell Companion to…•2017

    During the late 1980s and early 1990s, the hypothesis of N‐to‐D movement played a prominent role in approaches to word order within the nominal domain. In particular, where N precedes all its arguments and modifiers, N‐to‐D movement was proposed to be the cause. Over time, descriptive and explanatory limitations of such accounts were discovered, and questions arose about the theoretical plausibility and desirability of head movement in general. A…

  • Head-head relations in Problems of projection

    Vicki Carstens, Norbert Hornstein et al.•ARTICLE•The Linguistic Review•2016

    argues that D of an external argument in Spec TP is in principle as close to C as T is. Assuming that “inversion depends upon locality independent of category,” T and D should therefore compete with each other as candidates for raising to C in English questions, yet only T so raises. Chomsky takes this to indicate that the external argument is in its base position, Spec, vP, when C is merged. Our paper argues that this approach cannot generalize …

  • Negative concord and nominal licensing in Xhosa and Zulu

    Open Access•Vicki Carstens, Loyiso Mletshe•ARTICLE•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2016•Cited by: 8•References: 29

  • Delayed Valuation: A Reanalysis of Goal Features, "Upward" Complementizer Agreement, and the Mechanics of Case

    Open Access•Vicki Carstens•ARTICLE•Syntax•2016•Cited by: 21•References: 53

    There are at least four opposing views on the directionality and configuration of Agree relations. In mainstream minimalism, Agree is strictly downward "probing" (Chomsky,; Bošković; Epstein & Seely), but some recent works argue that Agree always looks upward (Zeijlstra, Wurmbrand). A third perspective takes agreement to follow from the Spec-head configuration (Koopman), and under a fourth proposal, the directionality of Agree varies parametrical…

  • Radical Defectivity: Implications of Xhosa Expletive Constructions

    Vicki Carstens, Loyiso Mletshe•ARTICLE•Linguistic Inquiry•2015•Cited by: 11•References: 43

    In Xhosa VSO clauses, subject agreement exhibits default features, objects cannot be pronominalized, a subject focus reading is obligatory, and experiencer verbs with two DP arguments are precluded. We argue that impoverished versions of T and v* in VSO clauses lack the probe features involved in subject agreement, EPP, object shift, and nominative/accusative valuation within Xhosa SVO sentences. Only an unusual focus-linked strategy can Case-lic…

  • Agreeing How? Implications for Theories of Agreement and Locality

    Vicki Carstens, Michael Diercks•ARTICLE•Linguistic Inquiry•2013•Cited by: 12•References: 46

    In Lubukusu and Lusaamia, the wh-expression 'how' agrees in φ-features with the subject of its clause. We show that agreement on 'how' is not always identical to subject agreement on the verb: the two diverge in certain locative inversion and subject extraction environments. On the basis of these facts, we argue that 'how' is a vP adjunct with downward-probing uφ independent of the uφ that underlies subject agreement. We also explore locality par…

  • Hyperactivity and Hyperagreement in Bantu

    Open Access•Vicki Carstens•ARTICLE•Lingua•2011•Cited by: 33•References: 17

  • Agree and Epp in Bantu

    Open Access•Vicki Carstens•ARTICLE•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2005•Cited by: 49•References: 31

  • Rethinking Complementizer Agreement: Agree with a Case-Checked Goal

    Vicki Carstens•ARTICLE•Linguistic Inquiry•2003•Cited by: 24•References: 11

    Agree(X, Subj) accounts for all agreement in West Germanic: complementizer agreement (CA) results from an Agree relation between uninterpretable φ-features of Fin0 (Rizzi 1997) and φ-features of the subject; subject-verb agreement (SA) spells out uninterpretable φ-features of T0 on V0 raised to T0, even in OV clauses (Haegeman 2000). Although DPs need Case to participate in Agree relations (Chomsky 2000), deletion-marked Case remains syntacticall…

  • Antisymmetry and Word Order in Serial Constructions

    Open Access•Vicki Carstens•ARTICLE•Language•2002•Cited by: 8

    Strict head-final surface order derives from underlying left-headedness in , a Niger-Congo language of Nigeria. A word order anomaly in serial verb constructions (SVCs) strongly suggests this, and left-to-right asymmetric c-command among internal arguments of SVCs confirms it. The anomaly is universal among surface right-headed languages with SVCs, indicating that deep left-headedness is universal, as antisymmetry theory predicts (Kayne 1994). As…

  • Multiple Agreement and Case Deletion: Against φ-incompleteness

    Open Access•Vicki Carstens•ARTICLE•Syntax•2001•Cited by: 32

    I argue against Chomsky's (1999, 2000) proposal that Case deletion correlates with the φ-completeness of probes, based on (i) the omission of gender in subject agreement in, for example, Romance languages; and (ii) the inclusion of full φ-features in subject agreement in Bantu, repeated on all verbal heads within a clause. I propose instead a return to the traditional view that certain categories are Case "assigners," such that Agree deletes the …

  • Concord in Minimalist Theory

    Vicki Carstens•ARTICLE•Linguistic Inquiry•2000•Cited by: 40•References: 8

    Concord within DP argues that movement is driven by uninterpretable features of either the target or the moved item, contra Chomsky 1995. The uninterpretable f-features of which concord consists must be eliminated by LF, to satisfy Full Interpretation. But raising of inflected APs and KPs into checking relations with N0 cannot be motivated, in Chomsky's system, since N0 has no uninterpretable features that these items can check. Assuming Kayne's …

  • Empty nouns in Bantu locatives

    Vicki Carstens•ARTICLE•The Linguistic Review•1997

    This paper presents an analysis of Chichewa locatives and their theoretical implications. Locative phrases exhibit contradictory properties, distributing with DPs but seeming to have preposition-like heads (ku, pa, and mu). I argue that they are DPs whose head nouns are silent. ku, pa, and mu are Case-markers, projecting KP complements to the null nouns and agreeing with them in gender. Word order shows that each KP loc raises to Spec of its cont…

  • Agree and Epp in Bantu

    Open Access•Vicki Carstens•ARTICLE•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2005•Cited by: 49•References: 31

  • Concord in Minimalist Theory

    Vicki Carstens•ARTICLE•Linguistic Inquiry•2000•Cited by: 40•References: 8

    Concord within DP argues that movement is driven by uninterpretable features of either the target or the moved item, contra Chomsky 1995. The uninterpretable f-features of which concord consists must be eliminated by LF, to satisfy Full Interpretation. But raising of inflected APs and KPs into checking relations with N0 cannot be motivated, in Chomsky's system, since N0 has no uninterpretable features that these items can check. Assuming Kayne's …

  • Hyperactivity and Hyperagreement in Bantu

    Open Access•Vicki Carstens•ARTICLE•Lingua•2011•Cited by: 33•References: 17

  • Multiple Agreement and Case Deletion: Against φ-incompleteness

    Open Access•Vicki Carstens•ARTICLE•Syntax•2001•Cited by: 32

    I argue against Chomsky's (1999, 2000) proposal that Case deletion correlates with the φ-completeness of probes, based on (i) the omission of gender in subject agreement in, for example, Romance languages; and (ii) the inclusion of full φ-features in subject agreement in Bantu, repeated on all verbal heads within a clause. I propose instead a return to the traditional view that certain categories are Case "assigners," such that Agree deletes the …

  • Rethinking Complementizer Agreement: Agree with a Case-Checked Goal

    Vicki Carstens•ARTICLE•Linguistic Inquiry•2003•Cited by: 24•References: 11

    Agree(X, Subj) accounts for all agreement in West Germanic: complementizer agreement (CA) results from an Agree relation between uninterpretable φ-features of Fin0 (Rizzi 1997) and φ-features of the subject; subject-verb agreement (SA) spells out uninterpretable φ-features of T0 on V0 raised to T0, even in OV clauses (Haegeman 2000). Although DPs need Case to participate in Agree relations (Chomsky 2000), deletion-marked Case remains syntacticall…

  • Delayed Valuation: A Reanalysis of Goal Features, "Upward" Complementizer Agreement, and the Mechanics of Case

    Open Access•Vicki Carstens•ARTICLE•Syntax•2016•Cited by: 21•References: 53

    There are at least four opposing views on the directionality and configuration of Agree relations. In mainstream minimalism, Agree is strictly downward "probing" (Chomsky,; Bošković; Epstein & Seely), but some recent works argue that Agree always looks upward (Zeijlstra, Wurmbrand). A third perspective takes agreement to follow from the Spec-head configuration (Koopman), and under a fourth proposal, the directionality of Agree varies parametrical…

  • Agreeing How? Implications for Theories of Agreement and Locality

    Vicki Carstens, Michael Diercks•ARTICLE•Linguistic Inquiry•2013•Cited by: 12•References: 46

    In Lubukusu and Lusaamia, the wh-expression 'how' agrees in φ-features with the subject of its clause. We show that agreement on 'how' is not always identical to subject agreement on the verb: the two diverge in certain locative inversion and subject extraction environments. On the basis of these facts, we argue that 'how' is a vP adjunct with downward-probing uφ independent of the uφ that underlies subject agreement. We also explore locality par…

  • Radical Defectivity: Implications of Xhosa Expletive Constructions

    Vicki Carstens, Loyiso Mletshe•ARTICLE•Linguistic Inquiry•2015•Cited by: 11•References: 43

    In Xhosa VSO clauses, subject agreement exhibits default features, objects cannot be pronominalized, a subject focus reading is obligatory, and experiencer verbs with two DP arguments are precluded. We argue that impoverished versions of T and v* in VSO clauses lack the probe features involved in subject agreement, EPP, object shift, and nominative/accusative valuation within Xhosa SVO sentences. Only an unusual focus-linked strategy can Case-lic…

  • Negative concord and nominal licensing in Xhosa and Zulu

    Open Access•Vicki Carstens, Loyiso Mletshe•ARTICLE•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2016•Cited by: 8•References: 29

  • Antisymmetry and Word Order in Serial Constructions

    Open Access•Vicki Carstens•ARTICLE•Language•2002•Cited by: 8

    Strict head-final surface order derives from underlying left-headedness in , a Niger-Congo language of Nigeria. A word order anomaly in serial verb constructions (SVCs) strongly suggests this, and left-to-right asymmetric c-command among internal arguments of SVCs confirms it. The anomaly is universal among surface right-headed languages with SVCs, indicating that deep left-headedness is universal, as antisymmetry theory predicts (Kayne 1994). As…

  • Only' in Nguni: A Phrase-Final Particle Meets Antisymmetry Theory

    Vicki Carstens, Jochen Zeller•ARTICLE•Linguistic Inquiry•2020•Cited by: 2•References: 28

    This article investigates the syntax of the phrase-final focus particles kuphela and qha 'only' in Zulu and Xhosa (Nguni; Bantu). We show that kuphela's and qha's associations with a focused constituent respect the complex topography of information structure in Nguni and, like English only, a surface c-command requirement. However, unlike English only, the Zulu and Xhosa particles typically follow the focus associate they c-command, a fact that p…

  • Empty nouns in Bantu locatives

    Vicki Carstens•ARTICLE•The Linguistic Review•1997

    This paper presents an analysis of Chichewa locatives and their theoretical implications. Locative phrases exhibit contradictory properties, distributing with DPs but seeming to have preposition-like heads (ku, pa, and mu). I argue that they are DPs whose head nouns are silent. ku, pa, and mu are Case-markers, projecting KP complements to the null nouns and agreeing with them in gender. Word order shows that each KP loc raises to Spec of its cont…

  • Concord in Minimalist Theory

    Vicki Carstens•ARTICLE•Linguistic Inquiry•2000•Cited by: 40•References: 8

    Concord within DP argues that movement is driven by uninterpretable features of either the target or the moved item, contra Chomsky 1995. The uninterpretable f-features of which concord consists must be eliminated by LF, to satisfy Full Interpretation. But raising of inflected APs and KPs into checking relations with N0 cannot be motivated, in Chomsky's system, since N0 has no uninterpretable features that these items can check. Assuming Kayne's …

  • Multiple Agreement and Case Deletion: Against φ-incompleteness

    Open Access•Vicki Carstens•ARTICLE•Syntax•2001•Cited by: 32

    I argue against Chomsky's (1999, 2000) proposal that Case deletion correlates with the φ-completeness of probes, based on (i) the omission of gender in subject agreement in, for example, Romance languages; and (ii) the inclusion of full φ-features in subject agreement in Bantu, repeated on all verbal heads within a clause. I propose instead a return to the traditional view that certain categories are Case "assigners," such that Agree deletes the …

  • Antisymmetry and Word Order in Serial Constructions

    Open Access•Vicki Carstens•ARTICLE•Language•2002•Cited by: 8

    Strict head-final surface order derives from underlying left-headedness in , a Niger-Congo language of Nigeria. A word order anomaly in serial verb constructions (SVCs) strongly suggests this, and left-to-right asymmetric c-command among internal arguments of SVCs confirms it. The anomaly is universal among surface right-headed languages with SVCs, indicating that deep left-headedness is universal, as antisymmetry theory predicts (Kayne 1994). As…

  • Rethinking Complementizer Agreement: Agree with a Case-Checked Goal

    Vicki Carstens•ARTICLE•Linguistic Inquiry•2003•Cited by: 24•References: 11

    Agree(X, Subj) accounts for all agreement in West Germanic: complementizer agreement (CA) results from an Agree relation between uninterpretable φ-features of Fin0 (Rizzi 1997) and φ-features of the subject; subject-verb agreement (SA) spells out uninterpretable φ-features of T0 on V0 raised to T0, even in OV clauses (Haegeman 2000). Although DPs need Case to participate in Agree relations (Chomsky 2000), deletion-marked Case remains syntacticall…

  • Agree and Epp in Bantu

    Open Access•Vicki Carstens•ARTICLE•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2005•Cited by: 49•References: 31

  • Hyperactivity and Hyperagreement in Bantu

    Open Access•Vicki Carstens•ARTICLE•Lingua•2011•Cited by: 33•References: 17

  • Agreeing How? Implications for Theories of Agreement and Locality

    Vicki Carstens, Michael Diercks•ARTICLE•Linguistic Inquiry•2013•Cited by: 12•References: 46

    In Lubukusu and Lusaamia, the wh-expression 'how' agrees in φ-features with the subject of its clause. We show that agreement on 'how' is not always identical to subject agreement on the verb: the two diverge in certain locative inversion and subject extraction environments. On the basis of these facts, we argue that 'how' is a vP adjunct with downward-probing uφ independent of the uφ that underlies subject agreement. We also explore locality par…

  • Radical Defectivity: Implications of Xhosa Expletive Constructions

    Vicki Carstens, Loyiso Mletshe•ARTICLE•Linguistic Inquiry•2015•Cited by: 11•References: 43

    In Xhosa VSO clauses, subject agreement exhibits default features, objects cannot be pronominalized, a subject focus reading is obligatory, and experiencer verbs with two DP arguments are precluded. We argue that impoverished versions of T and v* in VSO clauses lack the probe features involved in subject agreement, EPP, object shift, and nominative/accusative valuation within Xhosa SVO sentences. Only an unusual focus-linked strategy can Case-lic…

  • Head-head relations in Problems of projection

    Vicki Carstens, Norbert Hornstein et al.•ARTICLE•The Linguistic Review•2016

    argues that D of an external argument in Spec TP is in principle as close to C as T is. Assuming that “inversion depends upon locality independent of category,” T and D should therefore compete with each other as candidates for raising to C in English questions, yet only T so raises. Chomsky takes this to indicate that the external argument is in its base position, Spec, vP, when C is merged. Our paper argues that this approach cannot generalize …

  • Negative concord and nominal licensing in Xhosa and Zulu

    Open Access•Vicki Carstens, Loyiso Mletshe•ARTICLE•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2016•Cited by: 8•References: 29

  • Delayed Valuation: A Reanalysis of Goal Features, "Upward" Complementizer Agreement, and the Mechanics of Case

    Open Access•Vicki Carstens•ARTICLE•Syntax•2016•Cited by: 21•References: 53

    There are at least four opposing views on the directionality and configuration of Agree relations. In mainstream minimalism, Agree is strictly downward "probing" (Chomsky,; Bošković; Epstein & Seely), but some recent works argue that Agree always looks upward (Zeijlstra, Wurmbrand). A third perspective takes agreement to follow from the Spec-head configuration (Koopman), and under a fourth proposal, the directionality of Agree varies parametrical…

  • Noun‐to‐Determiner Movement

    Open Access•Vicki Carstens•OTHER•The Wiley Blackwell Companion to…•2017

    During the late 1980s and early 1990s, the hypothesis of N‐to‐D movement played a prominent role in approaches to word order within the nominal domain. In particular, where N precedes all its arguments and modifiers, N‐to‐D movement was proposed to be the cause. Over time, descriptive and explanatory limitations of such accounts were discovered, and questions arose about the theoretical plausibility and desirability of head movement in general. A…

  • Only' in Nguni: A Phrase-Final Particle Meets Antisymmetry Theory

    Vicki Carstens, Jochen Zeller•ARTICLE•Linguistic Inquiry•2020•Cited by: 2•References: 28

    This article investigates the syntax of the phrase-final focus particles kuphela and qha 'only' in Zulu and Xhosa (Nguni; Bantu). We show that kuphela's and qha's associations with a focused constituent respect the complex topography of information structure in Nguni and, like English only, a surface c-command requirement. However, unlike English only, the Zulu and Xhosa particles typically follow the focus associate they c-command, a fact that p…

  • Nguni Bare Nouns: Licensing without Case

    Vicki Carstens•ARTICLE•Linguistic Inquiry•2025•References: 65

    Nguni bare or augmentless ([−A]) nominals are licit only as strict negative dependents and wh-words. They may not appear in a preverbal subject position unless local to a negation-licensed [−A] complementizer of a subjunctive clause (Pietraszko 2021). This pattern motivates an analysis in terms of negative concord and a labeling theory approach to the Extended Projection Principle (EPP) (Chomsky 2013): [−A] nouns have uninterpretable negation fea…

  • The grammar of gender: Insights from Bantu asymmetries of AGR with conjoined subjects

    Open Access•Vicki Carstens•ARTICLE•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2026

Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (15 works) · Linguistics (14 works) · Philosophy (14 works) · Computer Science (13 works) · Mathematics (10 works) · Agreement (8 works) · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (8 works) · Linguistic Variation and Morphology (7 works) · Bantu languages (6 works) · Syntax (6 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae