Lars Johanson
Biographic Data
| ID | 812929 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Lars Johanson |
| GIVEN NAMES | Lars |
| FAMILY NAME | Johanson |
| SIGNATURE | JOHANSON L |
| AFFILIATIONS | Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-6731-8855 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 24 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 36 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 23 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 1 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1970 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2024 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
In memoriam Hendrik E. Boeschoten
Two-consonant conjuncts in Turkic runiform texts
In memoriam Ingeborg Hauenschild (1936–2021)
Vom Alttürkischen zu den modernen Türksprachen
On the Grammaticalization of Two Types of "ki" in Turkic
This article outlines various grammaticalization paths of the two types of the Turkic particle ki: the modal particle ki and the copied junctor ki. The element ki has been employed in Turkic languages in all documented historical periods, serving various semantic and syntactic functions as particles and junctors, i.e., subjunctors, conjunctors or adjunctors. Typological studies often blur any distinctions between semantic and syntactic properties…
Turkic Indirectivity
This chapter deals with various Turkic evidential categories, which typically express the notion of indirectivity. The primary task of indirectivity is not to express an external origin of the addresser’s knowledge of an event, but to indicate that a narrated event is stated in an indirect way, by reference to its reception by a conscious subject. The reception may be realised through hearsay, inference, or perception. Some more elaborate Turkic …
The Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality
Every language has a way of saying how one knows what one is talking about, and what one thinks about what one knows. In some languages, one always has to specify the information source on which it is based-whether the speaker saw the event, or heard it, or inferred it based on something seen or on common sense, or was told about it by someone else. This is the essence of evidentiality, or grammatical marking of information source-an exciting cat…
Copies versus Cognates in Bound Morphology
Genealogical linguistics and areal linguistics are rarely treated from an integrated perspective even if they are twin faces of diachronic linguistics. In Copies versus Cognates in Bound Morphology Lars Johanson and Martine Robbeets take up this challenge. The result is a wealth of empirical facts and different theoretical approaches, advanced by internationally renowned specialists and young scholars whose research is highly pertinent to the top…
Bound morphology in common
This chapter provides an overview of the key concepts discussed in this volume. Two or more languages have bound morphology in common when their affixes share certain properties, either globally, including form and function, or selectively, restricted to certain structural material, semantic, combinational or frequential properties only. The term cognate in the title of this chapter refers to a morpheme which is related to a morpheme in another l…
Dialect contact in Northern Cyprus
The interest in the study of Turkic contacts with other languages is currently increasing. Recent investigations have shown that language contacts have played an important role in the development of the Turkic languages. On the other hand, developments due to encounters of different variants of Turkic have played similar roles, although they have not attracted much attention so far. The most common reasons for Turkic-Turkic contacts have been mig…
Evidentials
Attractiveness and Relatedness
Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: Special Session on Caucasian, Dravidian, and Turkic Linguistics (2000)
Code-copying in Irano-Turkic
The intimate life of an Ottoman statesman. Melek Ahmed Pasha (1588–1662) as portrayed in Evliya Ҫelebi’s Book of Travels (Seyahat-Name). Translation and commentary by Robert Dankoff, with a historical…
"The intimate life of an Ottoman statesman. Melek Ahmed Pasha (1588–1662) as portrayed in Evliya Ҫelebi’s Book of Travels (Seyahat-Name). Translation and commentary by ROBERT DANKOFF, with a historical introduction by RHOADS MURPHEY. – Albany, State University of the New York Press 1991, 304 S" published on 18 Jan 1994 by Brill.
Evliya Çelebi in Bitlis. The Relevant Section of the Seyahatname
Robert Dankoff
ROBERT DANKOFF: Evliya Çelebi in Bitlis. The relevant section of the Seyahatname. Edited with translation, commentary and introduction. – Leiden, E.J. Brill 1990, xx, 435 S. (Evliya Ҫelebi's Book of Travels, 2)" published on 18 Jan 1994 by Brill
Griechische Lehnwörter im Türkischen (mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der anatolischen Dialekte)
Christos Tzitzius
Jan Schmidt
Muṣṭafā 'Ālī's Künhü'l-aḫbar and Its Preface According to the Leiden Manuscript
Substandard und Sprachwandel im Türkischen
On the Renewal and Reinterpretation of "Instrumental" Gerunds in Turkic
On the renewal and reinterpretation of “instrumental” gerunds in Turkic
Most Turkic languages possess a gerund1 based on a suffix (B), an element consisting minimally of a labial consonant2. B)> has been etymologized in various ways3; and we shall refrain from adding new proposals here4. In some Turkic texts and dialects, B)> may be followed by an element . Scholars have left no conceivable etymological explanation untried for this item either: it has been considered an allative5, an instrumental6, a locative7 suffix…
Zum Präsens der nordwestlichen und mittelasiatischen Türksprachen
The Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality
Every language has a way of saying how one knows what one is talking about, and what one thinks about what one knows. In some languages, one always has to specify the information source on which it is based-whether the speaker saw the event, or heard it, or inferred it based on something seen or on common sense, or was told about it by someone else. This is the essence of evidentiality, or grammatical marking of information source-an exciting cat…
Dialect contact in Northern Cyprus
The interest in the study of Turkic contacts with other languages is currently increasing. Recent investigations have shown that language contacts have played an important role in the development of the Turkic languages. On the other hand, developments due to encounters of different variants of Turkic have played similar roles, although they have not attracted much attention so far. The most common reasons for Turkic-Turkic contacts have been mig…
Code-copying in Irano-Turkic
Zum Präsens der nordwestlichen und mittelasiatischen Türksprachen
On the Renewal and Reinterpretation of "Instrumental" Gerunds in Turkic
On the renewal and reinterpretation of “instrumental” gerunds in Turkic
Most Turkic languages possess a gerund1 based on a suffix (B), an element consisting minimally of a labial consonant2. B)> has been etymologized in various ways3; and we shall refrain from adding new proposals here4. In some Turkic texts and dialects, B)> may be followed by an element . Scholars have left no conceivable etymological explanation untried for this item either: it has been considered an allative5, an instrumental6, a locative7 suffix…
Substandard und Sprachwandel im Türkischen
Griechische Lehnwörter im Türkischen (mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der anatolischen Dialekte)
Christos Tzitzius
Jan Schmidt
Muṣṭafā 'Ālī's Künhü'l-aḫbar and Its Preface According to the Leiden Manuscript
The intimate life of an Ottoman statesman. Melek Ahmed Pasha (1588–1662) as portrayed in Evliya Ҫelebi’s Book of Travels (Seyahat-Name). Translation and commentary by Robert Dankoff, with a historical…
"The intimate life of an Ottoman statesman. Melek Ahmed Pasha (1588–1662) as portrayed in Evliya Ҫelebi’s Book of Travels (Seyahat-Name). Translation and commentary by ROBERT DANKOFF, with a historical introduction by RHOADS MURPHEY. – Albany, State University of the New York Press 1991, 304 S" published on 18 Jan 1994 by Brill.
Evliya Çelebi in Bitlis. The Relevant Section of the Seyahatname
Robert Dankoff
ROBERT DANKOFF: Evliya Çelebi in Bitlis. The relevant section of the Seyahatname. Edited with translation, commentary and introduction. – Leiden, E.J. Brill 1990, xx, 435 S. (Evliya Ҫelebi's Book of Travels, 2)" published on 18 Jan 1994 by Brill
Code-copying in Irano-Turkic
Attractiveness and Relatedness
Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: Special Session on Caucasian, Dravidian, and Turkic Linguistics (2000)
Evidentials
Dialect contact in Northern Cyprus
The interest in the study of Turkic contacts with other languages is currently increasing. Recent investigations have shown that language contacts have played an important role in the development of the Turkic languages. On the other hand, developments due to encounters of different variants of Turkic have played similar roles, although they have not attracted much attention so far. The most common reasons for Turkic-Turkic contacts have been mig…
Copies versus Cognates in Bound Morphology
Genealogical linguistics and areal linguistics are rarely treated from an integrated perspective even if they are twin faces of diachronic linguistics. In Copies versus Cognates in Bound Morphology Lars Johanson and Martine Robbeets take up this challenge. The result is a wealth of empirical facts and different theoretical approaches, advanced by internationally renowned specialists and young scholars whose research is highly pertinent to the top…
Bound morphology in common
This chapter provides an overview of the key concepts discussed in this volume. Two or more languages have bound morphology in common when their affixes share certain properties, either globally, including form and function, or selectively, restricted to certain structural material, semantic, combinational or frequential properties only. The term cognate in the title of this chapter refers to a morpheme which is related to a morpheme in another l…
Turkic Indirectivity
This chapter deals with various Turkic evidential categories, which typically express the notion of indirectivity. The primary task of indirectivity is not to express an external origin of the addresser’s knowledge of an event, but to indicate that a narrated event is stated in an indirect way, by reference to its reception by a conscious subject. The reception may be realised through hearsay, inference, or perception. Some more elaborate Turkic …
The Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality
Every language has a way of saying how one knows what one is talking about, and what one thinks about what one knows. In some languages, one always has to specify the information source on which it is based-whether the speaker saw the event, or heard it, or inferred it based on something seen or on common sense, or was told about it by someone else. This is the essence of evidentiality, or grammatical marking of information source-an exciting cat…
Vom Alttürkischen zu den modernen Türksprachen
On the Grammaticalization of Two Types of "ki" in Turkic
This article outlines various grammaticalization paths of the two types of the Turkic particle ki: the modal particle ki and the copied junctor ki. The element ki has been employed in Turkic languages in all documented historical periods, serving various semantic and syntactic functions as particles and junctors, i.e., subjunctors, conjunctors or adjunctors. Typological studies often blur any distinctions between semantic and syntactic properties…
In memoriam Ingeborg Hauenschild (1936–2021)
Two-consonant conjuncts in Turkic runiform texts
In memoriam Hendrik E. Boeschoten
Philosophy (17 works) · Linguistics and Cultural Studies (13 works) · Linguistics (10 works) · History (9 works) · Linguistics and language evolution (8 works) · Philosophy (8 works) · Art (6 works) · Cultural and Sociopolitical Studies (6 works) · Computer Science (5 works) · Political science (4 works)