M Joaquin Lopez-Huertas
Biographic Data
| ID | 820573 |
|---|---|
| NAME | M Joaquin Lopez-Huertas |
| GIVEN NAMES | M Joaquin |
| FAMILY NAME | Lopez-Huertas |
| SIGNATURE | LOPEZ-HUERTAS M J |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Utah |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-4845-3810 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 5 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 3 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 5 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2025 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2025 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Planning in Re-existence: Decolonial Cracks and Indigenous Futurities
With limited recognition of rights and Land claims, Indigenous Peoples are constantly developing ways to resignify, reclaim, and reimagine the futurities of their Land. I refer to this as “planning in re-existence.” Building on decoloniality theory, planning in re-existence describes the mechanisms, Knowledges, and struggles Indigenous Peoples experience and negotiate under the dominance of settler states. Drawing from the disputes about the Bear…
[Re]framing planning with Indigenous Peoples: Reply to Catherine Oliver
Defining a framework within academia that observes, values, and advances Indigenous theory and practice may generate unintended consequences that recycle colonial relationships. Specifically, with
Decentring landscape perceptions: Response to Catherine Oliver (2024), ‘The birds of the Bay’: Avian landscapes of Morecambe Bay
This research portrays the importance of Morecambe Bay as a biodiverse ecosystem and the challenges of economic development and touristic disturbances. The ecological significance of Morecambe Bay
We don’t believe they are dead, they are just resting: Indigenous Knowledges as epistemological reclamation in planning
The integration of Indigenous Knowledges in planning represents an ongoing dilemma. On the one hand, involvement in the planning process enhances a decolonial space for Indigenous Peoples. On the other, it legitimates the coloniality of planning and coopts Indigenous Knowledges. Because of its complexity, a holistic view of the mechanisms Indigenous Peoples create to engage, support, and empower themselves during the planning process represents a…
Restoring our tomorrow: Planning for Who We Are
This article critically engages with the intersections of Indigeneity, decoloniality, and environmental disruption through a critique of the imposition of Bilagáanaa (Western) planning paradigms on the Navajo Nation governmental structures. We examine the Navajo Nation Chapter House Community Land Use Plan and emphasize how community-based processes of knowledge production, like mind maps, challenge and reframe the Navajo Nation Land policies. Hi…
We don’t believe they are dead, they are just resting: Indigenous Knowledges as epistemological reclamation in planning
The integration of Indigenous Knowledges in planning represents an ongoing dilemma. On the one hand, involvement in the planning process enhances a decolonial space for Indigenous Peoples. On the other, it legitimates the coloniality of planning and coopts Indigenous Knowledges. Because of its complexity, a holistic view of the mechanisms Indigenous Peoples create to engage, support, and empower themselves during the planning process represents a…
Planning in Re-existence: Decolonial Cracks and Indigenous Futurities
With limited recognition of rights and Land claims, Indigenous Peoples are constantly developing ways to resignify, reclaim, and reimagine the futurities of their Land. I refer to this as “planning in re-existence.” Building on decoloniality theory, planning in re-existence describes the mechanisms, Knowledges, and struggles Indigenous Peoples experience and negotiate under the dominance of settler states. Drawing from the disputes about the Bear…
Planning in Re-existence: Decolonial Cracks and Indigenous Futurities
With limited recognition of rights and Land claims, Indigenous Peoples are constantly developing ways to resignify, reclaim, and reimagine the futurities of their Land. I refer to this as “planning in re-existence.” Building on decoloniality theory, planning in re-existence describes the mechanisms, Knowledges, and struggles Indigenous Peoples experience and negotiate under the dominance of settler states. Drawing from the disputes about the Bear…
[Re]framing planning with Indigenous Peoples: Reply to Catherine Oliver
Defining a framework within academia that observes, values, and advances Indigenous theory and practice may generate unintended consequences that recycle colonial relationships. Specifically, with
Decentring landscape perceptions: Response to Catherine Oliver (2024), ‘The birds of the Bay’: Avian landscapes of Morecambe Bay
This research portrays the importance of Morecambe Bay as a biodiverse ecosystem and the challenges of economic development and touristic disturbances. The ecological significance of Morecambe Bay
We don’t believe they are dead, they are just resting: Indigenous Knowledges as epistemological reclamation in planning
The integration of Indigenous Knowledges in planning represents an ongoing dilemma. On the one hand, involvement in the planning process enhances a decolonial space for Indigenous Peoples. On the other, it legitimates the coloniality of planning and coopts Indigenous Knowledges. Because of its complexity, a holistic view of the mechanisms Indigenous Peoples create to engage, support, and empower themselves during the planning process represents a…
Restoring our tomorrow: Planning for Who We Are
This article critically engages with the intersections of Indigeneity, decoloniality, and environmental disruption through a critique of the imposition of Bilagáanaa (Western) planning paradigms on the Navajo Nation governmental structures. We examine the Navajo Nation Chapter House Community Land Use Plan and emphasize how community-based processes of knowledge production, like mind maps, challenge and reframe the Navajo Nation Land policies. Hi…
Geography (4 works) · Archaeology (3 works) · Biology (3 works) · Ecology (3 works) · Indigenous (3 works) · Philosophy (3 works) · Sociology (3 works) · Anthropological Studies and Insights (2 works) · Ecology (2 works) · Environmental ethics (2 works)