Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Charles E Binkley

Biographic Data

ID8306684
NAMECharles E Binkley
GIVEN NAMESCharles E
FAMILY NAMEBinkley
SIGNATUREBINKLEY C E
AFFILIATIONSEthics and Public Policy Center
ORCID0000-0001-9290-9876
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS4
TOTAL CITATIONS0
WORKS AS AUTHOR4
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2021
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2025
H-INDEX0
  • Governance of Direct‐to‐User Digital Mental Health Tools

    Open Access•Om D Panda, Charles E Binkley•ARTICLE•The Hastings Center Report•2025

    Digital mental health tools are increasingly used outside traditional clinical settings, creating an engagement paradigm beyond the existing regulatory scope, as noted by Amitabha Palmer and David Schwan in their article “Digital Mental Health Tools and AI Therapy Chatbots: A Balanced Approach to Regulation.” Introducing the direct‐to‐user concept (which concerns individuals as autonomous agents navigating self‐regulation, enhancement, and meanin…

  • Should We Rely on AI to Help Avoid Bias in Patient Selection for Major Surgery

    Open Access•Charles E Binkley, David S Kemp et al.•ARTICLE•The AMA Journal of Ethic•2022

    Many regard iatrogenic injuries as consequences of diagnosis or intervention actions. But inaction-not offering indicated major surgery-can also result in iatrogenic injury. This article explores some surgeons' overestimations of operative risk based on patients' race and socioeconomic status as unduly influential in their decisions about whether to perform major cancer or cardiac surgery on some patients with appropriate clinical indications. Th…

  • How Should Surgeons Communicate About Palliative and Curative Intentions, Purposes, and Outcomes

    Open Access•Charles E Binkley•ARTICLE•The AMA Journal of Ethic•2021

    How surgeons describe procedures should be accurate, precise, and concordant with patients' values. By focusing on intention rather than realistic goals, terms like curative and palliative , when applied to high-stakes operations, such as a Whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy, can be confusing to patients. This case commentary argues that surgeons' language choices can influence patients' decisions and experiences

  • Who, If Not the FDA, Should Regulate Implantable Brain-Computer Interface Devices

    Open Access•Charles E Binkley, Michael S Politz et al.•ARTICLE•The AMA Journal of Ethic•2021

    Implantable brain-computer interface (BCI) and other devices with potential for both therapeutic purposes and human enhancement are being rapidly developed. The distinction between therapeutic and enhancement uses of these devices is not well defined. While the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) rightly determines what is safe and effective, this article argues that the FDA should not make subjective, value-laden assessments about risks and be…

No prominent works on this page.

  • How Should Surgeons Communicate About Palliative and Curative Intentions, Purposes, and Outcomes

    Open Access•Charles E Binkley•ARTICLE•The AMA Journal of Ethic•2021

    How surgeons describe procedures should be accurate, precise, and concordant with patients' values. By focusing on intention rather than realistic goals, terms like curative and palliative , when applied to high-stakes operations, such as a Whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy, can be confusing to patients. This case commentary argues that surgeons' language choices can influence patients' decisions and experiences

  • Who, If Not the FDA, Should Regulate Implantable Brain-Computer Interface Devices

    Open Access•Charles E Binkley, Michael S Politz et al.•ARTICLE•The AMA Journal of Ethic•2021

    Implantable brain-computer interface (BCI) and other devices with potential for both therapeutic purposes and human enhancement are being rapidly developed. The distinction between therapeutic and enhancement uses of these devices is not well defined. While the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) rightly determines what is safe and effective, this article argues that the FDA should not make subjective, value-laden assessments about risks and be…

  • Should We Rely on AI to Help Avoid Bias in Patient Selection for Major Surgery

    Open Access•Charles E Binkley, David S Kemp et al.•ARTICLE•The AMA Journal of Ethic•2022

    Many regard iatrogenic injuries as consequences of diagnosis or intervention actions. But inaction-not offering indicated major surgery-can also result in iatrogenic injury. This article explores some surgeons' overestimations of operative risk based on patients' race and socioeconomic status as unduly influential in their decisions about whether to perform major cancer or cardiac surgery on some patients with appropriate clinical indications. Th…

  • Governance of Direct‐to‐User Digital Mental Health Tools

    Open Access•Om D Panda, Charles E Binkley•ARTICLE•The Hastings Center Report•2025

    Digital mental health tools are increasingly used outside traditional clinical settings, creating an engagement paradigm beyond the existing regulatory scope, as noted by Amitabha Palmer and David Schwan in their article “Digital Mental Health Tools and AI Therapy Chatbots: A Balanced Approach to Regulation.” Introducing the direct‐to‐user concept (which concerns individuals as autonomous agents navigating self‐regulation, enhancement, and meanin…

Computer Science (3 works) · Medicine (3 works) · Computer security (2 works) · Engineering (2 works) · Engineering ethics (2 works) · Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (2 works) · Psychiatry (2 works) · Psychology (2 works) · Accountability (1 work) · Agency (philosophy) (1 work)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae