Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Gila Sher

Biographic Data

ID833945
NAMEGila Sher
GIVEN NAMESGila
FAMILY NAMESher
SIGNATURESHER G
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of California San Diego
ORCID0000-0002-2395-9228
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS15
TOTAL CITATIONS20
AUTHOR COUNT14
EDITOR COUNT1
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1994
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2023
H-INDEX2
  • A new defense of Tarski's solution to the liar paradox

    Open Access•Gila Sher•ARTICLE•Philosophical Studies•2023

    Tarski's hierarchical solution to the Liar paradox is widely viewed as ad hoc. In this paper I show that, on the contrary, Tarski's solution is justified by a sound philosophical principle that concerns the inner structure of truth. This principle provides a common philosophical basis to a number of solutions to the Liar paradox, including Tarski's and Kripke's. Tarski himself may not have been aware of this principle, but by providing a philosop…

  • The metaphysics of truth: Anti-deflationism and substantial pluralism

    Gila Sher•ARTICLE•Inquiry•2023

    Two central themes of Douglas Edwards’s The Metaphysics of Truth are anti-deflationism and substantial pluralism. In Part I of this paper I discuss Edwards’s grounds for rejecting deflationism and suggest a few additional grounds. In Part II I discuss Edward's truth-pluralism and respond to his criticism of my correspondence-pluralism. While these pluralisms share significant features, their differences also raise several important questions

  • Correspondence pluralism

    Open Access•Gila Sher•ARTICLE•Synthese•2023•References: 18

    In this paper I present a pluralist view of truth of a special kind: correspondence-pluralism. Correspondence-pluralism is the view that to fulfill its function in knowledge, truth requires correspondence principles rather than mere coherence, pragmatist, or deflationist principles. But these correspondence principles do not need to be the naive principles of traditional correspondence: copy, mirror image, direct isomorphism. Furthermore, these c…

  • Invariance as a basis for necessity and laws

    Open Access•Gila Sher•ARTICLE•Philosophical Studies•2021

    Many philosophers are baffled by necessity. Humeans, in particular, are deeply disturbed by the idea of necessary laws of nature. In this paper I offer a systematic yet down to earth explanation of necessity and laws in terms of invariance. The type of invariance I employ for this purpose generalizes an invariance used in meta-logic. The main idea is that properties and relations in general have certain degrees of invariance, and some properties/…

  • Epistemic Friction: An Essay on Knowledge, Truth, and Logic

    Gila Sher•BOOK•Epistemic Friction•2016

    Gila Sher provides an original view of knowledge from the perspective of our basic human epistemic situation, as limited yet resourceful beings, trying to understand the world in all its complexity. She develops an integrated theory of knowledge, truth, and logic, centred on the idea of epistemic friction: knowledge must be constrained by the world.

  • Substantivism about truth

    Open Access•Gila Sher•ARTICLE•Philosophy Compass•2016•References: 28

    Substantivism is a general philosophical methodology advocating a substantive approach to philosophical theorizing. In this article, I present an overview of this methodology with a special emphasis on the field of truth. I begin with a framework for understanding what is at stake in the substantivist-deflationist debate and describe the substantivist critique of deflationism. I then proceed to discuss contemporary substantivism as a positive met…

  • In memoriam: Jaakko Hintikka

    Open Access•Gila Sher•ARTICLE•Synthese•2015

  • Is logic in the mind or in the world

    Open Access•Gila Sher•ARTICLE•Synthese•2011•Cited by: 2•References: 8

    The paper presents an outline of a unified answer to five questions concerning logic: (1) Is logic in the mind or in the world? (2) Does logic need a foundation? What is the main obstacle to a foundation for logic? Can it be overcome? (3) How does logic work? What does logical form represent? Are logical constants referential? (4) Is there a criterion of logicality? (5) What is the relation between logic and mathematics

  • In Search of a Substantive Theory of Truth

    Gila Sher, Inc Journal of Philosophy•ARTICLE•The Journal of Philosophy•2004

    THE JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY VOLUME CI, NO. 1, JANUARY 2004 IN SEARCH OF A SUBSTANTIVE THEORY OF TRUTH* The layman...expects philosophers to answer deep questions of great import for an understanding of the world.... And the layman is quite right.... Yet he finds most writings by philosophers of the analytical school disconcertingly remote from these concerns.... The complaint...is understandable.... [Alnalytical philosophy passed, comparatively rec…

  • Truth, Logical Structure, and Compositionality

    Open Access•Gila Sher•ARTICLE•Synthese•2001•References: 22

  • The Formal-Structural View of Logical Consequence

    Gila Sher•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•2001•Cited by: 2•References: 11

    In a recent paper, 'The Concept of Logical Consequence," W. H. Hanson (1997) criticizes a fml-strmctural characterization of logical consequence in Tarski (1966) and Sher (1991Sher ( ,1996a) ) .'Hanson accepts many principles of the formal-structural view.Relating to Sher 1991 and 1996a, he says: Sher's fundamental principles are sound.She holds that in deciding how the logical consequence relation shall be delineated we must take into account bo…

  • The Formal-Structural View of Logical Consequence

    Gila Sher•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•2001•Cited by: 1

  • Between Logic and Intuition: Essays in Honor of Charles Parsons

    Open Access•Charles Parsons, Gila Sher et al.•BOOK•Between Logic and Intuition•2000

    This collection of essays offers a conspectus of major trends in the philosophy of logic and philosophy of mathematics. A distinguished group of philosophers addresses issues at the centre of contemporary debate: semantic and set-theoretic paradoxes, the set/class distinction, foundations of set theory, mathematical intuition and many others. The volume includes Hilary Putnam's 1995 Alfred Tarski lectures.

  • On the Possibility of a Substantive Theory of Truth

    Open Access•Gila Sher•ARTICLE•Synthese•1998•Cited by: 15•References: 35

  • Foundations without Foundationalism: A Case for Second-Order Logic

    Gila Sher•REVIEW•The Philosophical Review•1994

    PART I: ORIENTATION Terms and questions Foundationalism and foundations of mathematics PART II: LOGIC AND MATHEMATICS Theory Metatheory Second-order logic and mathematics Advanced metatheory PART III: HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY The historical triumph of first-order languages Second-order logic and rule-following The competition Index

  • On the Possibility of a Substantive Theory of Truth

    Open Access•Gila Sher•ARTICLE•Synthese•1998•Cited by: 15•References: 35

  • Is logic in the mind or in the world

    Open Access•Gila Sher•ARTICLE•Synthese•2011•Cited by: 2•References: 8

    The paper presents an outline of a unified answer to five questions concerning logic: (1) Is logic in the mind or in the world? (2) Does logic need a foundation? What is the main obstacle to a foundation for logic? Can it be overcome? (3) How does logic work? What does logical form represent? Are logical constants referential? (4) Is there a criterion of logicality? (5) What is the relation between logic and mathematics

  • The Formal-Structural View of Logical Consequence

    Gila Sher•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•2001•Cited by: 2•References: 11

    In a recent paper, 'The Concept of Logical Consequence," W. H. Hanson (1997) criticizes a fml-strmctural characterization of logical consequence in Tarski (1966) and Sher (1991Sher ( ,1996a) ) .'Hanson accepts many principles of the formal-structural view.Relating to Sher 1991 and 1996a, he says: Sher's fundamental principles are sound.She holds that in deciding how the logical consequence relation shall be delineated we must take into account bo…

  • The Formal-Structural View of Logical Consequence

    Gila Sher•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•2001•Cited by: 1

  • Foundations without Foundationalism: A Case for Second-Order Logic

    Gila Sher•REVIEW•The Philosophical Review•1994

    PART I: ORIENTATION Terms and questions Foundationalism and foundations of mathematics PART II: LOGIC AND MATHEMATICS Theory Metatheory Second-order logic and mathematics Advanced metatheory PART III: HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY The historical triumph of first-order languages Second-order logic and rule-following The competition Index

  • On the Possibility of a Substantive Theory of Truth

    Open Access•Gila Sher•ARTICLE•Synthese•1998•Cited by: 15•References: 35

  • Between Logic and Intuition: Essays in Honor of Charles Parsons

    Open Access•Charles Parsons, Gila Sher et al.•BOOK•Between Logic and Intuition•2000

    This collection of essays offers a conspectus of major trends in the philosophy of logic and philosophy of mathematics. A distinguished group of philosophers addresses issues at the centre of contemporary debate: semantic and set-theoretic paradoxes, the set/class distinction, foundations of set theory, mathematical intuition and many others. The volume includes Hilary Putnam's 1995 Alfred Tarski lectures.

  • Truth, Logical Structure, and Compositionality

    Open Access•Gila Sher•ARTICLE•Synthese•2001•References: 22

  • The Formal-Structural View of Logical Consequence

    Gila Sher•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•2001•Cited by: 2•References: 11

    In a recent paper, 'The Concept of Logical Consequence," W. H. Hanson (1997) criticizes a fml-strmctural characterization of logical consequence in Tarski (1966) and Sher (1991Sher ( ,1996a) ) .'Hanson accepts many principles of the formal-structural view.Relating to Sher 1991 and 1996a, he says: Sher's fundamental principles are sound.She holds that in deciding how the logical consequence relation shall be delineated we must take into account bo…

  • The Formal-Structural View of Logical Consequence

    Gila Sher•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•2001•Cited by: 1

  • In Search of a Substantive Theory of Truth

    Gila Sher, Inc Journal of Philosophy•ARTICLE•The Journal of Philosophy•2004

    THE JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY VOLUME CI, NO. 1, JANUARY 2004 IN SEARCH OF A SUBSTANTIVE THEORY OF TRUTH* The layman...expects philosophers to answer deep questions of great import for an understanding of the world.... And the layman is quite right.... Yet he finds most writings by philosophers of the analytical school disconcertingly remote from these concerns.... The complaint...is understandable.... [Alnalytical philosophy passed, comparatively rec…

  • Is logic in the mind or in the world

    Open Access•Gila Sher•ARTICLE•Synthese•2011•Cited by: 2•References: 8

    The paper presents an outline of a unified answer to five questions concerning logic: (1) Is logic in the mind or in the world? (2) Does logic need a foundation? What is the main obstacle to a foundation for logic? Can it be overcome? (3) How does logic work? What does logical form represent? Are logical constants referential? (4) Is there a criterion of logicality? (5) What is the relation between logic and mathematics

  • In memoriam: Jaakko Hintikka

    Open Access•Gila Sher•ARTICLE•Synthese•2015

  • Epistemic Friction: An Essay on Knowledge, Truth, and Logic

    Gila Sher•BOOK•Epistemic Friction•2016

    Gila Sher provides an original view of knowledge from the perspective of our basic human epistemic situation, as limited yet resourceful beings, trying to understand the world in all its complexity. She develops an integrated theory of knowledge, truth, and logic, centred on the idea of epistemic friction: knowledge must be constrained by the world.

  • Substantivism about truth

    Open Access•Gila Sher•ARTICLE•Philosophy Compass•2016•References: 28

    Substantivism is a general philosophical methodology advocating a substantive approach to philosophical theorizing. In this article, I present an overview of this methodology with a special emphasis on the field of truth. I begin with a framework for understanding what is at stake in the substantivist-deflationist debate and describe the substantivist critique of deflationism. I then proceed to discuss contemporary substantivism as a positive met…

  • Invariance as a basis for necessity and laws

    Open Access•Gila Sher•ARTICLE•Philosophical Studies•2021

    Many philosophers are baffled by necessity. Humeans, in particular, are deeply disturbed by the idea of necessary laws of nature. In this paper I offer a systematic yet down to earth explanation of necessity and laws in terms of invariance. The type of invariance I employ for this purpose generalizes an invariance used in meta-logic. The main idea is that properties and relations in general have certain degrees of invariance, and some properties/…

  • A new defense of Tarski's solution to the liar paradox

    Open Access•Gila Sher•ARTICLE•Philosophical Studies•2023

    Tarski's hierarchical solution to the Liar paradox is widely viewed as ad hoc. In this paper I show that, on the contrary, Tarski's solution is justified by a sound philosophical principle that concerns the inner structure of truth. This principle provides a common philosophical basis to a number of solutions to the Liar paradox, including Tarski's and Kripke's. Tarski himself may not have been aware of this principle, but by providing a philosop…

  • The metaphysics of truth: Anti-deflationism and substantial pluralism

    Gila Sher•ARTICLE•Inquiry•2023

    Two central themes of Douglas Edwards’s The Metaphysics of Truth are anti-deflationism and substantial pluralism. In Part I of this paper I discuss Edwards’s grounds for rejecting deflationism and suggest a few additional grounds. In Part II I discuss Edward's truth-pluralism and respond to his criticism of my correspondence-pluralism. While these pluralisms share significant features, their differences also raise several important questions

  • Correspondence pluralism

    Open Access•Gila Sher•ARTICLE•Synthese•2023•References: 18

    In this paper I present a pluralist view of truth of a special kind: correspondence-pluralism. Correspondence-pluralism is the view that to fulfill its function in knowledge, truth requires correspondence principles rather than mere coherence, pragmatist, or deflationist principles. But these correspondence principles do not need to be the naive principles of traditional correspondence: copy, mirror image, direct isomorphism. Furthermore, these c…

Epistemology (14 works) · Philosophy (14 works) · Philosophy and Theoretical Science (10 works) · Metaphysics (8 works) · Classical Philosophy and Thought (7 works) · Philosophy of language (7 works) · Computer Science (6 works) · Mathematics (6 works) · Philosophy of science (5 works) · Philosophy and History of Science (4 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae