Jillian C Banfield
Biographic Data
| ID | 84315 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Jillian C Banfield |
| GIVEN NAMES | Jillian C |
| FAMILY NAME | Banfield |
| SIGNATURE | BANFIELD J C |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Waterloo |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 5 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 58 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 5 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2011 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2015 |
| H-INDEX | 3 |
Prosocial Behavior and Empathy
Responding to historical injustices: Does group membership trump liberal‐conservative ideology
In the legal literature, “privity” refers to the link between a minority's current social, psychological, and economic problems and its previous mistreatment by the government. Scholars speculate that judgments of privity underlie support for redress for historical injustices. There is no gold standard for evaluating privity, however, and its assessment is susceptible to personal and situational influences. We conducted three studies to examine h…
Whites' perceptions of discrimination against Blacks: The influence of common identity
A Person by Situation Account of Motivated System Defense
Three studies demonstrate how individual differences in confidence in the sociopolitical system interact with threats that engage the system justification motive to produce system defense. Following threat, participants low, but not high, in system confidence increasingly defended the system, by rejecting system change (Study 1) and preferring domestic over international products (Studies 2 and 3). These findings contribute to the literature on s…
When Your World Must Be Defended: Choosing Products to Justify the System
Consumers are often strongly motivated to view themselves as part of a legitimate and fair external system. Our research focuses on how individuals adopt distinct ways of defending their system when it is threatened and, in particular, how this is revealed in their consumption choices. We find that although individuals differ in how confident they are in the legitimacy of their system, they do not differ in their motivation to defend the system w…
Whites' perceptions of discrimination against Blacks: The influence of common identity
When Your World Must Be Defended: Choosing Products to Justify the System
Consumers are often strongly motivated to view themselves as part of a legitimate and fair external system. Our research focuses on how individuals adopt distinct ways of defending their system when it is threatened and, in particular, how this is revealed in their consumption choices. We find that although individuals differ in how confident they are in the legitimacy of their system, they do not differ in their motivation to defend the system w…
Responding to historical injustices: Does group membership trump liberal‐conservative ideology
In the legal literature, “privity” refers to the link between a minority's current social, psychological, and economic problems and its previous mistreatment by the government. Scholars speculate that judgments of privity underlie support for redress for historical injustices. There is no gold standard for evaluating privity, however, and its assessment is susceptible to personal and situational influences. We conducted three studies to examine h…
A Person by Situation Account of Motivated System Defense
Three studies demonstrate how individual differences in confidence in the sociopolitical system interact with threats that engage the system justification motive to produce system defense. Following threat, participants low, but not high, in system confidence increasingly defended the system, by rejecting system change (Study 1) and preferring domestic over international products (Studies 2 and 3). These findings contribute to the literature on s…
When Your World Must Be Defended: Choosing Products to Justify the System
Consumers are often strongly motivated to view themselves as part of a legitimate and fair external system. Our research focuses on how individuals adopt distinct ways of defending their system when it is threatened and, in particular, how this is revealed in their consumption choices. We find that although individuals differ in how confident they are in the legitimacy of their system, they do not differ in their motivation to defend the system w…
Whites' perceptions of discrimination against Blacks: The influence of common identity
Responding to historical injustices: Does group membership trump liberal‐conservative ideology
In the legal literature, “privity” refers to the link between a minority's current social, psychological, and economic problems and its previous mistreatment by the government. Scholars speculate that judgments of privity underlie support for redress for historical injustices. There is no gold standard for evaluating privity, however, and its assessment is susceptible to personal and situational influences. We conducted three studies to examine h…
Prosocial Behavior and Empathy
Psychology (4 works) · Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 works) · Social Psychology (4 works) · Cultural Differences and Values (3 works) · Ideology (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Political science (2 works) · Politics (2 works) · Sociology (2 works) · Affect (linguistics (1 works)