Sharon L Feldman
Biographic Data
| ID | 8450028 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Sharon L Feldman |
| GIVEN NAMES | Sharon L |
| FAMILY NAME | Feldman |
| SIGNATURE | FELDMAN S L |
| AFFILIATIONS | The University of Melbourne |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-9762-3700 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 5 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 5 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2020 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
From corridor to boardroom
In this paper, we present a model of clinical ethics support that is focused on addressing clinicians’ ethical concerns in practical and meaningful ways, including at a systems level within the hospital by engaging institutional leadership. Our work highlights the importance of this approach as a focus in nascent service establishment. The ‘corridor-to-boardroom’ model that we put forward aims to amplify clinicians’ voices in order to motivate or…
Attending to the micro in resource prioritisation
Since the COVID-19 pandemic, attention to elective (or planned) surgery waiting lists has been increasingly urgent and sustained. While the ethical challenge of prioritising patients for planned surgeries is extensively discussed at a policy or system level, little attention has been paid to ethical practice at the individual clinician level. We argue that surgical resource allocation should be reconceptualised as an ethical issue that spans the …
How is clinical ethics reasoning done in practice? A review of the empirical literature
BACKGROUND: Clinical ethics reasoning is one of the unique contributions of clinical ethicists to healthcare, and is common to all models of clinical ethics support and methods of case analysis. Despite being a fundamental aspect of clinical ethics practice, the phenomenon of clinical ethics reasoning is not well understood. There are no formal definitions or models of clinical ethics reasoning, and it is unclear whether there is a shared underst…
Unacknowledged Moral Rights of Authorship in Academic Medicine Presentations
Arizona Health Care Systems’ Coordinated Response to Covid-19—“In It Together”
Connectivity is both the cause of and the most powerful response to the COVID-19 pandemic
No prominent works on this page.
Arizona Health Care Systems’ Coordinated Response to Covid-19—“In It Together”
Connectivity is both the cause of and the most powerful response to the COVID-19 pandemic
Unacknowledged Moral Rights of Authorship in Academic Medicine Presentations
From corridor to boardroom
In this paper, we present a model of clinical ethics support that is focused on addressing clinicians’ ethical concerns in practical and meaningful ways, including at a systems level within the hospital by engaging institutional leadership. Our work highlights the importance of this approach as a focus in nascent service establishment. The ‘corridor-to-boardroom’ model that we put forward aims to amplify clinicians’ voices in order to motivate or…
Attending to the micro in resource prioritisation
Since the COVID-19 pandemic, attention to elective (or planned) surgery waiting lists has been increasingly urgent and sustained. While the ethical challenge of prioritising patients for planned surgeries is extensively discussed at a policy or system level, little attention has been paid to ethical practice at the individual clinician level. We argue that surgical resource allocation should be reconceptualised as an ethical issue that spans the …
How is clinical ethics reasoning done in practice? A review of the empirical literature
BACKGROUND: Clinical ethics reasoning is one of the unique contributions of clinical ethicists to healthcare, and is common to all models of clinical ethics support and methods of case analysis. Despite being a fundamental aspect of clinical ethics practice, the phenomenon of clinical ethics reasoning is not well understood. There are no formal definitions or models of clinical ethics reasoning, and it is unclear whether there is a shared underst…
Medicine (3 works) · Clinical Ethics (2 works) · Ethics in medical practice (2 works) · Health care (2 works) · Innovations in Medical Education (2 works) · Political science (2 works) · Psychology (2 works) · 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak (1 works) · Academic medicine (1 works) · Academic Publishing and Open Access (1 works)