A K P Kludze
Biographic Data
| ID | 8520978 |
|---|---|
| NAME | A K P Kludze |
| GIVEN NAMES | A K P |
| FAMILY NAME | Kludze |
| SIGNATURE | KLUDZE A K P |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 2 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 2 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1987 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1998 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Chieftaincy jurisdication and the muddle of constitutional interpretation in Ghana
The Supreme Court of Ghana, in The Ghana Bar Association v. The Attorney General , has unanimously decided that, even under the 1992 Constitution, High Court and the Court of Appeal have no jurisdiction in chieftaincy matters. Even if this decision itself is correct, it is nevertheless premised on highly questionable legal propositions and dicta which strike at the foundations of several otherwise settled principles and canons of construction
Accountability of the Head of Family in Ghana
By a decree, the Head of Family (Accountability) Law, 1985, it has now been statutorily established that, in Ghana, whatever may have been the doubts in the past on the issue, the Head of Family is accountable for any family property entrusted to him. The relevant provisions of the Law are: Section 2 of the Law provides for an application by motion to the court for accounts by “any member of the family to which such property belongs who has or cl…
No prominent works on this page.
Accountability of the Head of Family in Ghana
By a decree, the Head of Family (Accountability) Law, 1985, it has now been statutorily established that, in Ghana, whatever may have been the doubts in the past on the issue, the Head of Family is accountable for any family property entrusted to him. The relevant provisions of the Law are: Section 2 of the Law provides for an application by motion to the court for accounts by “any member of the family to which such property belongs who has or cl…
Chieftaincy jurisdication and the muddle of constitutional interpretation in Ghana
The Supreme Court of Ghana, in The Ghana Bar Association v. The Attorney General , has unanimously decided that, even under the 1992 Constitution, High Court and the Court of Appeal have no jurisdiction in chieftaincy matters. Even if this decision itself is correct, it is nevertheless premised on highly questionable legal propositions and dicta which strike at the foundations of several otherwise settled principles and canons of construction
Law (2 works) · Legal Issues in South Africa (2 works) · Philosophy (2 works) · Political science (2 works) · Supreme court (2 works) · Accountability (1 work) · Appeal (1 work) · Comparative and International Law Studies (1 work) · Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction (1 work) · Constitution (1 work)