Do Hyun Park
Biographic Data
| ID | 8548838 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Do Hyun Park |
| GIVEN NAMES | Do Hyun |
| FAMILY NAME | Park |
| SIGNATURE | PARK H |
| AFFILIATIONS | Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-0199-4337 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 3 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2024 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2025 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Insights from the Incheon Airport Case in South Korea
This article examines the use of facial recognition technology (FRT) in policing by government agencies, exploring the tensions between public safety and individual rights. While FRT enhances law enforcement capabilities in crime prevention and security, it also raises significant concerns regarding privacy invasion and potential misuse. Based on the Incheon Airport case in South Korea, this analysis investigates whether the public interest deriv…
Automated decision-making in South Korea
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) of the European Union has established regulations on automated decisions in Article 22 with the proliferation of artificial intelligence. In response, the Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA) of South Korea, serving as a counterpart to the GDPR, has recently incorporated provisions for automated decisions under Article 37-2 through an amendment. Although the PIPA follows a distinct legal framewo…
A Tough Balancing Act – The Evolving AI Governance in Korea
AI governance began to emerge as a focal point of discourse in Korea from the mid 2010s. Since then, multiple government and public bodies have released guidelines for AI governance, and various tech companies have announced their own AI ethics and governance principles. Beyond its borders, Korea has also actively participated in efforts to establish international norms and guidelines on AI governance. These developments were in part propelled by…
No prominent works on this page.
Automated decision-making in South Korea
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) of the European Union has established regulations on automated decisions in Article 22 with the proliferation of artificial intelligence. In response, the Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA) of South Korea, serving as a counterpart to the GDPR, has recently incorporated provisions for automated decisions under Article 37-2 through an amendment. Although the PIPA follows a distinct legal framewo…
A Tough Balancing Act – The Evolving AI Governance in Korea
AI governance began to emerge as a focal point of discourse in Korea from the mid 2010s. Since then, multiple government and public bodies have released guidelines for AI governance, and various tech companies have announced their own AI ethics and governance principles. Beyond its borders, Korea has also actively participated in efforts to establish international norms and guidelines on AI governance. These developments were in part propelled by…
Insights from the Incheon Airport Case in South Korea
This article examines the use of facial recognition technology (FRT) in policing by government agencies, exploring the tensions between public safety and individual rights. While FRT enhances law enforcement capabilities in crime prevention and security, it also raises significant concerns regarding privacy invasion and potential misuse. Based on the Incheon Airport case in South Korea, this analysis investigates whether the public interest deriv…
Business (2 works) · Computer Science (2 works) · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Political science (2 works) · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (1 work) · Computer security (1 work) · Corporate governance (1 work) · Data Protection Act 1998 (1 work) · Economics (1 work)