Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Allen Trent

Biographic Data

ID86037
NAMEAllen Trent
GIVEN NAMESAllen
FAMILY NAMETrent
SIGNATURETRENT A
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Wyoming
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS4
TOTAL CITATIONS160
AUTHOR COUNT4
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2006
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2020
H-INDEX2
  • Interpretation In Qualitative Research

    Allen Trent, Jeasik Cho•CHAPTER•Oxford Handbook of Qualitative…•2020

    This chapter addresses a wide range of concepts related to interpretation in qualitative research, examines the meaning and importance of interpretation in qualitative inquiry, and explores the ways methodology, data, and the self/researcher as instrument interact and impact interpretive processes. Additionally, the chapter presents a series of strategies for qualitative researchers engaged in the process of interpretation and closes by presentin…

  • Evaluating Qualitative Research 2.0

    Jeasik Cho, Allen Trent•CHAPTER•Oxford Handbook of Qualitative…•2020

    This chapter addresses a wide range of theories and practices related to the evaluation of qualitative research (EQR 2.0). First, five categories of EQR 2.0 are presented: (a) a general EQR category, (b) a “subtle-realist” category, (c) postcriteriology category, (d) an art-based research category, and (e) a postvalidity category. Second, evaluation strategies for EQR are offered by providing a variety of actual examples, including ones from mixe…

  • Validity Criteria for Performance-Related Qualitative Work

    Open Access•Jeasik Cho, Allen Trent•ARTICLE•Qualitative Inquiry•2009•Cited by: 7•References: 39

    This article proposes working criteria for guiding and judging the validity of performance-related qualitative work based on Conquergood's dialogical performance and Madison's performance of possibilities. A series of criteria is proposed considering three performance-based stages that pursue new meanings for performance in/as qualitative inquiry: (1) Imaginative performance as an ongoing textual rehearsal process; (2) Performance in use, associa…

  • Validity in qualitative research revisited

    Open Access•Jeasik Cho, Allen Trent•ARTICLE•Qualitative Research•2006•Cited by: 153•References: 13

    Concerns with the issues of validity in qualitative research have dramatically increased. Traditionally, validity in qualitative research involved determining the degree to which researchers' claims about knowledge corresponded to the reality (or research participants' construction of reality) being studied. The authors note that recent trends have shown the emergence of two quite different approaches to the validity question within the literatur…

  • Validity in qualitative research revisited

    Open Access•Jeasik Cho, Allen Trent•ARTICLE•Qualitative Research•2006•Cited by: 153•References: 13

    Concerns with the issues of validity in qualitative research have dramatically increased. Traditionally, validity in qualitative research involved determining the degree to which researchers' claims about knowledge corresponded to the reality (or research participants' construction of reality) being studied. The authors note that recent trends have shown the emergence of two quite different approaches to the validity question within the literatur…

  • Validity Criteria for Performance-Related Qualitative Work

    Open Access•Jeasik Cho, Allen Trent•ARTICLE•Qualitative Inquiry•2009•Cited by: 7•References: 39

    This article proposes working criteria for guiding and judging the validity of performance-related qualitative work based on Conquergood's dialogical performance and Madison's performance of possibilities. A series of criteria is proposed considering three performance-based stages that pursue new meanings for performance in/as qualitative inquiry: (1) Imaginative performance as an ongoing textual rehearsal process; (2) Performance in use, associa…

  • Validity in qualitative research revisited

    Open Access•Jeasik Cho, Allen Trent•ARTICLE•Qualitative Research•2006•Cited by: 153•References: 13

    Concerns with the issues of validity in qualitative research have dramatically increased. Traditionally, validity in qualitative research involved determining the degree to which researchers' claims about knowledge corresponded to the reality (or research participants' construction of reality) being studied. The authors note that recent trends have shown the emergence of two quite different approaches to the validity question within the literatur…

  • Validity Criteria for Performance-Related Qualitative Work

    Open Access•Jeasik Cho, Allen Trent•ARTICLE•Qualitative Inquiry•2009•Cited by: 7•References: 39

    This article proposes working criteria for guiding and judging the validity of performance-related qualitative work based on Conquergood's dialogical performance and Madison's performance of possibilities. A series of criteria is proposed considering three performance-based stages that pursue new meanings for performance in/as qualitative inquiry: (1) Imaginative performance as an ongoing textual rehearsal process; (2) Performance in use, associa…

  • Interpretation In Qualitative Research

    Allen Trent, Jeasik Cho•CHAPTER•Oxford Handbook of Qualitative…•2020

    This chapter addresses a wide range of concepts related to interpretation in qualitative research, examines the meaning and importance of interpretation in qualitative inquiry, and explores the ways methodology, data, and the self/researcher as instrument interact and impact interpretive processes. Additionally, the chapter presents a series of strategies for qualitative researchers engaged in the process of interpretation and closes by presentin…

  • Evaluating Qualitative Research 2.0

    Jeasik Cho, Allen Trent•CHAPTER•Oxford Handbook of Qualitative…•2020

    This chapter addresses a wide range of theories and practices related to the evaluation of qualitative research (EQR 2.0). First, five categories of EQR 2.0 are presented: (a) a general EQR category, (b) a “subtle-realist” category, (c) postcriteriology category, (d) an art-based research category, and (e) a postvalidity category. Second, evaluation strategies for EQR are offered by providing a variety of actual examples, including ones from mixe…

Computer Science (3 works) · Qualitative research (3 works) · Social science (3 works) · Sociology (3 works) · Epistemology (2 works) · Evaluation and Performance Assessment (2 works) · Participatory Visual Research Methods (2 works) · Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (2 works) · Reflexivity (2 works) · Artificial Intelligence (1 work)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae