Kirstin Borgerson
Biographic Data
| ID | 8676134 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Kirstin Borgerson |
| GIVEN NAMES | Kirstin |
| FAMILY NAME | Borgerson |
| SIGNATURE | BORGERSON K |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-9043-8801 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 5 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 5 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2009 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2020 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Susan Sherwin
Pedagogy and Feminist Bioethics
An Argument for Fewer Clinical Trials
The volume of clinical research is increasing exponentially—far beyond our ability to process and absorb the results. Given this situation, it may be beneficial to consider reducing the flow at its source. In what follows, I will motivate and critically evaluate the following proposal: researchers should conduct fewer clinical trials. More specifically, I c onsider whether researchers should be permitted to conduct only clinical research of very …
Why reading the title isn't good enough
Proponents of evidence-based medicine (EBM) have recently suggested a approach to clinical decision making in which physicians are advised to rely on increasingly abstract summaries of the available research evidence. This retreat from the original data of medical research is ill-advised: it extends an unjustified evidence hierarchy, overestimates the role of computer systems, divides communities, discards evidence, ignores contexts, and devalues…
Why reading the title isn’t good enough
Proponents of evidence-based medicine (EBM) have recently suggested a “4S” approach to clinical decision making in which physicians are advised to rely on increasingly abstract summaries of the available research evidence. This retreat from the original data of medical research is ill-advised: it extends an unjustified evidence hierarchy, overestimates the role of computer systems, divides communities, discards evidence, ignores contexts, and dev…
No prominent works on this page.
Why reading the title isn't good enough
Proponents of evidence-based medicine (EBM) have recently suggested a approach to clinical decision making in which physicians are advised to rely on increasingly abstract summaries of the available research evidence. This retreat from the original data of medical research is ill-advised: it extends an unjustified evidence hierarchy, overestimates the role of computer systems, divides communities, discards evidence, ignores contexts, and devalues…
Why reading the title isn’t good enough
Proponents of evidence-based medicine (EBM) have recently suggested a “4S” approach to clinical decision making in which physicians are advised to rely on increasingly abstract summaries of the available research evidence. This retreat from the original data of medical research is ill-advised: it extends an unjustified evidence hierarchy, overestimates the role of computer systems, divides communities, discards evidence, ignores contexts, and dev…
An Argument for Fewer Clinical Trials
The volume of clinical research is increasing exponentially—far beyond our ability to process and absorb the results. Given this situation, it may be beneficial to consider reducing the flow at its source. In what follows, I will motivate and critically evaluate the following proposal: researchers should conduct fewer clinical trials. More specifically, I c onsider whether researchers should be permitted to conduct only clinical research of very …
Susan Sherwin
Pedagogy and Feminist Bioethics
Law (4 works) · Political science (4 works) · Psychology (4 works) · Epistemology (3 works) · Sociology (3 works) · Bioethics (2 works) · Ethics in medical practice (2 works) · Health Policy Implementation Science (2 works) · Health Sciences Research and Education (2 works) · Medicine (2 works)