Jérémy Zehr
Biographic Data
| ID | 8759572 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Jérémy Zehr |
| GIVEN NAMES | Jérémy |
| FAMILY NAME | Zehr |
| SIGNATURE | ZEHR J |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Pennsylvania |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-6046-8647 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 3 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2018 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2018 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Are Gaps Preferred to Gluts? A Closer Look at Borderline Contradictions
Returning to non-entailed presuppositions again
Recent work by Sudo (2012) and Klinedinst (2016) proposes a new perspective ondifferences between classes of presupposition triggers, with an empirical split roughly mirroringAbusch’s (2002) hard vs. soft distinction and related notions. These two authors proposethat triggers differ in whether or not their presuppositional content simultaneously affects thecalculation of the presuppositions and of the entailments of the sentences in which they ap…
Interpreting presuppositions in the scope of quantifiers
This paper experimentally investigates presupposition projection from the scope ofthe quantifiers every and at least one, as triggered by the factive verb be aware and the iterativeadverb again. The first issue we are concerned with is whether presuppositions projectuniversally or existentially from quantified sentences. Different theoretical accounts endorseopposing views here (e.g., Heim, 1983; Geurts, 1999; Beaver, 2001; Schlenker, 2008, 2009;…
No prominent works on this page.
Are Gaps Preferred to Gluts? A Closer Look at Borderline Contradictions
Returning to non-entailed presuppositions again
Recent work by Sudo (2012) and Klinedinst (2016) proposes a new perspective ondifferences between classes of presupposition triggers, with an empirical split roughly mirroringAbusch’s (2002) hard vs. soft distinction and related notions. These two authors proposethat triggers differ in whether or not their presuppositional content simultaneously affects thecalculation of the presuppositions and of the entailments of the sentences in which they ap…
Interpreting presuppositions in the scope of quantifiers
This paper experimentally investigates presupposition projection from the scope ofthe quantifiers every and at least one, as triggered by the factive verb be aware and the iterativeadverb again. The first issue we are concerned with is whether presuppositions projectuniversally or existentially from quantified sentences. Different theoretical accounts endorseopposing views here (e.g., Heim, 1983; Geurts, 1999; Beaver, 2001; Schlenker, 2008, 2009;…
Epistemology (3 works) · Linguistics (3 works) · Mathematics (3 works) · Philosophy (3 works) · Presupposition (2 works) · Psychology (2 works) · Statistics (2 works) · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (2 works) · Advanced Algebra and Logic (1 work) · Algorithm (1 work)