Nasarudin Abdul Rahman
Biographic Data
| ID | 8776582 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Nasarudin Abdul Rahman |
| GIVEN NAMES | Nasarudin Abdul |
| FAMILY NAME | Rahman |
| SIGNATURE | RAHMAN N A |
| AFFILIATIONS | International Islamic University Malaysia |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 3 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2020 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2025 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Jurisdictional Overlap Between the Malaysian Competition Commission and the Securities Commission in Merger Review
The introduction of merger control provisions through the proposed amendment to Malaysia’s Competition Act 2010 (Act 712) represents a pivotal development in the country’s competition law framework. Merger control is a fundamental component of competition regulation globally, ensuring that business consolidations do not create monopolistic structures that harm market competition and consumer welfare. Many jurisdictions, including those in Southea…
Merger Control Regime in Malaysia
Merger control is one of the main pillars of a competition law regime. Without a merger control provision, a competition authority is unable to prevent a problematic merger that lessens competition in the market from being consummated. Malaysia, having its national cross-sector competition law regime in place only since 2010, has, apart from sectoral regulations, no merger control regime in place. The country has adopted a sectoral approach to me…
E-Hailing Services
Uber-Grab’s merger had attracted antitrust scrutiny by competition authorities in Southeast-Asia. The merger between the two had created a large giant company that provides various services through a platform such as ridesharing and food delivery services. According to the deal, Grab will take over Uber’s assets (ridesharing and food delivery service), and in return, Uber will take a 27.5 percent stake in Grab. Although Grab claimed that the merg…
No prominent works on this page.
E-Hailing Services
Uber-Grab’s merger had attracted antitrust scrutiny by competition authorities in Southeast-Asia. The merger between the two had created a large giant company that provides various services through a platform such as ridesharing and food delivery services. According to the deal, Grab will take over Uber’s assets (ridesharing and food delivery service), and in return, Uber will take a 27.5 percent stake in Grab. Although Grab claimed that the merg…
Merger Control Regime in Malaysia
Merger control is one of the main pillars of a competition law regime. Without a merger control provision, a competition authority is unable to prevent a problematic merger that lessens competition in the market from being consummated. Malaysia, having its national cross-sector competition law regime in place only since 2010, has, apart from sectoral regulations, no merger control regime in place. The country has adopted a sectoral approach to me…
Jurisdictional Overlap Between the Malaysian Competition Commission and the Securities Commission in Merger Review
The introduction of merger control provisions through the proposed amendment to Malaysia’s Competition Act 2010 (Act 712) represents a pivotal development in the country’s competition law framework. Merger control is a fundamental component of competition regulation globally, ensuring that business consolidations do not create monopolistic structures that harm market competition and consumer welfare. Many jurisdictions, including those in Southea…
Business (3 works) · Competition law (3 works) · Economics (3 works) · Finance (3 works) · Law (3 works) · Market economy (3 works) · Monopoly (3 works) · Political science (3 works) · Commission (2 works) · Competition (biology) (2 works)