Gregory Firestone
Biographic Data
| ID | 8813647 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Gregory Firestone |
| GIVEN NAMES | Gregory |
| FAMILY NAME | Firestone |
| SIGNATURE | FIRESTONE G |
| AFFILIATIONS | Supreme Court of the United States |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 3 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2004 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2020 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Confidentiality and Privilege for Family and Child Protection Mediation
This article will identify the inconsistency and confusion in mediation regarding the definition of mediation, the role of the mediator, and the difference between mediation confidentiality and privilege. Further, it will discuss the confusion and inconsistency in the protection of mediation communication, specifically regarding the definition of mediation communication, the time frame for protected communication, waiver of the protections and ex…
Privadentiality
The emergence of innovative family and child protection dispute resolution (DR) methods has resulted in a varying array of communication protections. Review of these communication protections in the United States reveals a lack of consistency and clarity within each form of DR, and no clear policy to guide the development of the different communication protections across the spectrum of DR methods. This article proposes a new term, privadentialit…
In the Best Interests of Children
In the traditional family law and child protection litigation where the court is asked to make determinations based on the best interests of a minor, the adversarial, rights‐based model often fails to serve the interests of children and families and may be more harmful than beneficial to children relative to other possible methods of dispute resolution. This article examines the shortcomings of such an adversarial, rights‐based model; briefly hig…
No prominent works on this page.
In the Best Interests of Children
In the traditional family law and child protection litigation where the court is asked to make determinations based on the best interests of a minor, the adversarial, rights‐based model often fails to serve the interests of children and families and may be more harmful than beneficial to children relative to other possible methods of dispute resolution. This article examines the shortcomings of such an adversarial, rights‐based model; briefly hig…
Confidentiality and Privilege for Family and Child Protection Mediation
This article will identify the inconsistency and confusion in mediation regarding the definition of mediation, the role of the mediator, and the difference between mediation confidentiality and privilege. Further, it will discuss the confusion and inconsistency in the protection of mediation communication, specifically regarding the definition of mediation communication, the time frame for protected communication, waiver of the protections and ex…
Privadentiality
The emergence of innovative family and child protection dispute resolution (DR) methods has resulted in a varying array of communication protections. Review of these communication protections in the United States reveals a lack of consistency and clarity within each form of DR, and no clear policy to guide the development of the different communication protections across the spectrum of DR methods. This article proposes a new term, privadentialit…
Dispute resolution (3 works) · Law (3 works) · Political science (3 works) · Psychology (3 works) · Alternative dispute resolution (2 works) · Computer Science (2 works) · Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies (2 works) · Adversarial system (1 work) · Artificial Intelligence (1 work) · Best interests (1 work)