Øyvind Bø
Biographic Data
| ID | 8835721 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Øyvind Bø |
| GIVEN NAMES | Øyvind |
| FAMILY NAME | Bø |
| SIGNATURE | BO O |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Oslo |
| ORCID | 0009-0003-2087-4258 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 2 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 2 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
‘Objectively comparable’? The free movement of persons within the European Economic Area
Article 1 EEA establishes a ‘homogeneous European Economic Area’ that entails ‘the free movement of persons’. Nationals of the EEA EFTA States are afforded rights of movement and residence, regardless of whether they are economically active. The CJEU has characterized the legal status of EEA nationals as ‘objectively comparable’ with that of EU citizens. Differences between the rights protection afforded in the EEA EFTA pillar and the EU pillar w…
Lawful residence as a condition for access to social security benefits
The equal treatment provision in Article 4 of the Social Security Regulation does not refer to the conditions for lawful residence in the Citizenship Directive. The CJEU has nevertheless applied lawful residence as a condition for the right to equal treatment in cases concerning economically inactive Union citizens claiming social security benefits in the host Member State. Critics contend that the requirement of lawful residence in respect of cl…
No prominent works on this page.
‘Objectively comparable’? The free movement of persons within the European Economic Area
Article 1 EEA establishes a ‘homogeneous European Economic Area’ that entails ‘the free movement of persons’. Nationals of the EEA EFTA States are afforded rights of movement and residence, regardless of whether they are economically active. The CJEU has characterized the legal status of EEA nationals as ‘objectively comparable’ with that of EU citizens. Differences between the rights protection afforded in the EEA EFTA pillar and the EU pillar w…
Lawful residence as a condition for access to social security benefits
The equal treatment provision in Article 4 of the Social Security Regulation does not refer to the conditions for lawful residence in the Citizenship Directive. The CJEU has nevertheless applied lawful residence as a condition for the right to equal treatment in cases concerning economically inactive Union citizens claiming social security benefits in the host Member State. Critics contend that the requirement of lawful residence in respect of cl…
Discrimination and Equality Law (2 works) · European Law and Migration (2 works) · European union (2 works) · Legislation (2 works) · Citizenship (1 work) · European and International Law Studies (1 work) · Free movement (1 work) · Freedom of movement (1 work) · Gender and Women's Rights (1 work) · Pillar (1 work)