Rajiv Kaushik
Biographic Data
| ID | 8839329 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Rajiv Kaushik |
| GIVEN NAMES | Rajiv |
| FAMILY NAME | Kaushik |
| SIGNATURE | KAUSHIK R |
| AFFILIATIONS | Brock University |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 7 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 7 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2021 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Annabelle Dufourcq’s Merleau-Ponty
“The Problem of Speech in Merleau-Ponty
The turn away from phenomenology in 20th century French philosophy was in large part due to an increased emphasis on Ferdinand de Saussure’s notion of “linguistic structure”, i.e., that language is the internal system of differences between signs. Thinkers such as Paul Ricoeur and Jean-François Lyotard famously offered a “semiological challenge” to phenomenology. The idea was that phenomenology, especially Merleau-Ponty’s phenomenology, reduces t…
The Political Logic of Experience and the Paradox of Expression
Mauro Carbone, Philosophy-Screens
Where Is Negation in Merleau-Ponty’s Ontology? Symbolic Formation and the Implex
This paper concerns a basic ambiguity in Merleau-Ponty’s ontology between the reversibility of flesh and its écart . Where the former suggests continuity between the sensing and the sensible, the latter suggests their separation. It is difficult to know from reading The Visible and the Invisible which is to be prioritized or how one is to be read alongside the other. I argue that such a relation comes to light by thinking through the negation tha…
The secondary passivity
Literature, Ontology, and Implex in Merleau-Ponty
This paper examines the ambiguous relationship between the literary uses of language in Merleau-Ponty’s own work and his ontology. It is argued that Merleau-Ponty’s critique of phenomenology—that is, his critique of an already critical philosophy—leads him to say that the limits of phenomena are inside the entire structure of the phenomena. They are, in other words, promiscuous or dehiscent and therefore are not limits that can themselves be give…
No prominent works on this page.
Where Is Negation in Merleau-Ponty’s Ontology? Symbolic Formation and the Implex
This paper concerns a basic ambiguity in Merleau-Ponty’s ontology between the reversibility of flesh and its écart . Where the former suggests continuity between the sensing and the sensible, the latter suggests their separation. It is difficult to know from reading The Visible and the Invisible which is to be prioritized or how one is to be read alongside the other. I argue that such a relation comes to light by thinking through the negation tha…
The secondary passivity
Literature, Ontology, and Implex in Merleau-Ponty
This paper examines the ambiguous relationship between the literary uses of language in Merleau-Ponty’s own work and his ontology. It is argued that Merleau-Ponty’s critique of phenomenology—that is, his critique of an already critical philosophy—leads him to say that the limits of phenomena are inside the entire structure of the phenomena. They are, in other words, promiscuous or dehiscent and therefore are not limits that can themselves be give…
Mauro Carbone, Philosophy-Screens
The Political Logic of Experience and the Paradox of Expression
“The Problem of Speech in Merleau-Ponty
The turn away from phenomenology in 20th century French philosophy was in large part due to an increased emphasis on Ferdinand de Saussure’s notion of “linguistic structure”, i.e., that language is the internal system of differences between signs. Thinkers such as Paul Ricoeur and Jean-François Lyotard famously offered a “semiological challenge” to phenomenology. The idea was that phenomenology, especially Merleau-Ponty’s phenomenology, reduces t…
Annabelle Dufourcq’s Merleau-Ponty
Philosophy (6 works) · Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (5 works) · Epistemology (4 works) · Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (4 works) · Ontology (3 works) · Simone de Beauvoir and Sartre (3 works) · Computer Science (2 works) · Continental philosophy (2 works) · Linguistics (2 works) · Philosophy of mind (2 works)