Hansjörg Plieninger
Biographic Data
| ID | 8867339 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Hansjörg Plieninger |
| GIVEN NAMES | Hansjörg |
| FAMILY NAME | Plieninger |
| SIGNATURE | PLIENINGER H |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-4416-300X |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 3 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2014 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2018 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
A New Model for Acquiescence at the Interface of Psychometrics and Cognitive Psychology
When measuring psychological traits, one has to consider that respondents often show content-unrelated response behavior in answering questionnaires. To disentangle the target trait and two such response styles, extreme responding and midpoint responding, Böckenholt ( 2012a ) developed an item response model based on a latent processing tree structure. We propose a theoretically motivated extension of this model to also measure acquiescence, the …
Mountain or Molehill? A Simulation Study on the Impact of Response Styles
Even though there is an increasing interest in response styles, the field lacks a systematic investigation of the bias that response styles potentially cause. Therefore, a simulation was carried out to study this phenomenon with a focus on applied settings (reliability, validity, scale scores). The influence of acquiescence and extreme response style was investigated, and independent variables were, for example, the number of reverse-keyed items.…
Validity of Multiprocess IRT Models for Separating Content and Response Styles
Response styles, the tendency to respond to Likert-type items irrespective of content, are a widely known threat to the reliability and validity of self-report measures. However, it is still debated how to measure and control for response styles such as extreme responding. Recently, multiprocess item response theory models have been proposed that allow for separating multiple response processes in rating data. The rationale behind these models is…
No prominent works on this page.
Validity of Multiprocess IRT Models for Separating Content and Response Styles
Response styles, the tendency to respond to Likert-type items irrespective of content, are a widely known threat to the reliability and validity of self-report measures. However, it is still debated how to measure and control for response styles such as extreme responding. Recently, multiprocess item response theory models have been proposed that allow for separating multiple response processes in rating data. The rationale behind these models is…
Mountain or Molehill? A Simulation Study on the Impact of Response Styles
Even though there is an increasing interest in response styles, the field lacks a systematic investigation of the bias that response styles potentially cause. Therefore, a simulation was carried out to study this phenomenon with a focus on applied settings (reliability, validity, scale scores). The influence of acquiescence and extreme response style was investigated, and independent variables were, for example, the number of reverse-keyed items.…
A New Model for Acquiescence at the Interface of Psychometrics and Cognitive Psychology
When measuring psychological traits, one has to consider that respondents often show content-unrelated response behavior in answering questionnaires. To disentangle the target trait and two such response styles, extreme responding and midpoint responding, Böckenholt ( 2012a ) developed an item response model based on a latent processing tree structure. We propose a theoretically motivated extension of this model to also measure acquiescence, the …
Developmental psychology (3 works) · Item response theory (3 works) · Psychology (3 works) · Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (3 works) · Psychometrics (3 works) · Social Psychology (3 works) · Acquiescence (2 works) · Econometrics (2 works) · Mathematics (2 works) · Reliability (semiconductor) (2 works)