Jermo Van Nes
Biographic Data
| ID | 8868243 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Jermo Van Nes |
| GIVEN NAMES | Jermo |
| FAMILY NAME | Van Nes |
| SIGNATURE | VAN NES J |
| AFFILIATIONS | Evangelical Theological Faculty |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 2 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 2 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2016 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2018 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Pauline Language and the Pastoral Epistles
In Pauline Language and the Pastoral Epistles Jermo van Nes questions the common assumption in New Testament scholarship that language variation is necessarily due to author variation. By using the so-called Pastoral Epistles (PE) as a test-case, Van Nes demonstrates by means of statistical linguistics that only one out of five of their major lexical and syntactic peculiarities differs significantly from other Pauline writings. Most of the PE’s l…
On the Origin of the Pastorals' Authenticity Criticism
It is generally agreed among contemporary scholars that the modern critique of the authorship claim of the New Testament letters addressed to Timothy and Titus originated in early nineteenth-century Germany with the studies of Schmidt and Schleiermacher on 1 Timothy. However, a late eighteenth-century study by the British clergyman Edward Evanson challenges this consensus as it proves Titus to have been suspect of pseudonymity before. This ‘new’ …
No prominent works on this page.
On the Origin of the Pastorals' Authenticity Criticism
It is generally agreed among contemporary scholars that the modern critique of the authorship claim of the New Testament letters addressed to Timothy and Titus originated in early nineteenth-century Germany with the studies of Schmidt and Schleiermacher on 1 Timothy. However, a late eighteenth-century study by the British clergyman Edward Evanson challenges this consensus as it proves Titus to have been suspect of pseudonymity before. This ‘new’ …
Pauline Language and the Pastoral Epistles
In Pauline Language and the Pastoral Epistles Jermo van Nes questions the common assumption in New Testament scholarship that language variation is necessarily due to author variation. By using the so-called Pastoral Epistles (PE) as a test-case, Van Nes demonstrates by means of statistical linguistics that only one out of five of their major lexical and syntactic peculiarities differs significantly from other Pauline writings. Most of the PE’s l…
Biblical Studies and Interpretation (2 works) · Historical and Linguistic Studies (2 works) · New Testament (2 works) · Philosophy (2 works) · Political science (2 works) · Art (1 work) · Bible (1 work) · Bible, language, style (1 work) · Classics (1 work) · Criticism (1 work)