Philip B Payne
Biographic Data
| ID | 8868327 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Philip B Payne |
| GIVEN NAMES | Philip B |
| FAMILY NAME | Payne |
| SIGNATURE | PAYNE P B |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 4 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 4 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1995 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2017 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Vaticanus Distigme-obelos Symbols Marking Added Text, Including 1 Corinthians 14.34–5
The two-dot-plus-bar ‘distigme-obelos’ symbols in Vaticanus signal added text. Five characteristic features distinguish their obeloi from paragraphoi. Like scribe B's LXX obeloi, all eight distigme-obelos symbols mark the location of added text. A gap at the exact location of a widely recognised, multi-word addition follows every distigme-obelos except one with distinctive downward dipping strokes. The Vaticanus Gospels are so early that they hav…
Tim 2.12 and the Use of ουδε to Combine Two Elements to Express a Single Idea
Paul typically uses ουδε to convey a single idea, as do the two closest syntactical parallels to 1 Tim 2.12. In the overwhelming majority of Paul's and the NT's ουκ + ουδε + αλλα syntactical constructions, ουδε joins two expressions to convey a single idea in sharp contrast to the following αλλα statement. Furthermore, the earliest known commentary on 1 Tim 2.12, Origen's, treats it as a single prohibition. Accordingly, the most natural reading o…
MS. 88 as Evidence for a Text without 1 Cor 14.34–5
This critical note explains the most likely origin of the dislocated text at the end of 1 Corinthians 14 in the Greek twelfth century AD minuscule 88. 1 There are four distinctive features of this passage in ms. 88. 1) Cor 14.36 follows immediately after 14.33. 2) Cor 14.34–5 follows 14.40. 3) Cor 14.34—5 is a distinct unit separated from v. 40 by a double slash on the base line in the space normally occupied by letters. The words on each side of…
Fuldensis, Sigla for Variants in Vaticanus, and 1 Cor 14.34–5
This article identifies two previously unnoticed items of textual evidence that support the view that 1 Cor 14.34–5 (‘Let women keep silence in the churches ...’) was an interpolation. I conclude that Bishop Victor ordered the rewriting of 1 Cor 14.34–40 in the margin of Codex Fuldensis (see photograph on page 261) with w. 34–5 omitted and that there is a text-critical siglum that indicates the scribe's awareness of a textual variant at the begin…
No prominent works on this page.
Fuldensis, Sigla for Variants in Vaticanus, and 1 Cor 14.34–5
This article identifies two previously unnoticed items of textual evidence that support the view that 1 Cor 14.34–5 (‘Let women keep silence in the churches ...’) was an interpolation. I conclude that Bishop Victor ordered the rewriting of 1 Cor 14.34–40 in the margin of Codex Fuldensis (see photograph on page 261) with w. 34–5 omitted and that there is a text-critical siglum that indicates the scribe's awareness of a textual variant at the begin…
MS. 88 as Evidence for a Text without 1 Cor 14.34–5
This critical note explains the most likely origin of the dislocated text at the end of 1 Corinthians 14 in the Greek twelfth century AD minuscule 88. 1 There are four distinctive features of this passage in ms. 88. 1) Cor 14.36 follows immediately after 14.33. 2) Cor 14.34–5 follows 14.40. 3) Cor 14.34—5 is a distinct unit separated from v. 40 by a double slash on the base line in the space normally occupied by letters. The words on each side of…
Tim 2.12 and the Use of ουδε to Combine Two Elements to Express a Single Idea
Paul typically uses ουδε to convey a single idea, as do the two closest syntactical parallels to 1 Tim 2.12. In the overwhelming majority of Paul's and the NT's ουκ + ουδε + αλλα syntactical constructions, ουδε joins two expressions to convey a single idea in sharp contrast to the following αλλα statement. Furthermore, the earliest known commentary on 1 Tim 2.12, Origen's, treats it as a single prohibition. Accordingly, the most natural reading o…
Vaticanus Distigme-obelos Symbols Marking Added Text, Including 1 Corinthians 14.34–5
The two-dot-plus-bar ‘distigme-obelos’ symbols in Vaticanus signal added text. Five characteristic features distinguish their obeloi from paragraphoi. Like scribe B's LXX obeloi, all eight distigme-obelos symbols mark the location of added text. A gap at the exact location of a widely recognised, multi-word addition follows every distigme-obelos except one with distinctive downward dipping strokes. The Vaticanus Gospels are so early that they hav…
Historical and Linguistic Studies (4 works) · Philosophy (4 works) · Biblical Studies and Interpretation (3 works) · History (3 works) · Linguistics (3 works) · Mathematics (3 works) · Arithmetic (2 works) · Art (2 works) · Combinatorics (2 works) · Computer Science (2 works)