Kirill V Karpov
Biographic Data
| ID | 8883280 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Kirill V Karpov |
| GIVEN NAMES | Kirill V |
| FAMILY NAME | Karpov |
| SIGNATURE | KARPOV K V |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 4 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 4 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2020 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2025 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
The Modal Critique of the Ontological Argument. Thomas Aquinas vs Anselm of Canterbury
This article examines Thomas Aquinas’s critique of Anselm of Canterbury’s ontological argument, focusing particularly on its modal aspects. While Aquinas’s traditional objections (the fallacy of begging the question and the non-self-evidence of God’s definition) have been thoroughly studied, their modal interpretation requires further analysis. The article demonstrates that Aquinas rejects Anselm’s argument because it conflates the ontological ne…
The Problem of Epistemic Disagreement in Contemporary Philosophy of Religion Part II
In this article I focus on the problem of religious disagreement – whether one should loose one’s confidence in his or her religious beliefs in the face of significant disagreement on certain religious issues. The article consists of two large parts. In the first, I describe the main categories of the epistemology of disagreement in the focus of religious disagreement (first-order and higher-level significance of evidences in disagreement, fun…
The Problem of Epistemic Disagreement in Contemporary Philosophy of Religion Part I
In this article I focus on the problem of religious disagreement – whether one should lose one’s confidence in his or her religious beliefs in the face of significant disagreement on certain religious issues. The article consists of two large parts. In the first one, the author describes the main categories of the epistemology of disagreement in the focus of religious disagreement (first-order and higher-level significance of evidences in disag…
A moral problem for theodicies
Одна из главных проблем в современных философии религии и этике касается того факта, что после случившихся в XX столетии событий, воплотивших в себе ужасающие проявления зла (прежде всего, это геноцид в отношении различных народов, а также концлагеря), предлагать теодицеи для оправдания случившегося стало оскорбительным и унизительным для тех, кто подобный опыт зла пережил. Автор статьи обращается к эссе Эммануэля Левинаса «Бесполезное страдание…
No prominent works on this page.
A moral problem for theodicies
Одна из главных проблем в современных философии религии и этике касается того факта, что после случившихся в XX столетии событий, воплотивших в себе ужасающие проявления зла (прежде всего, это геноцид в отношении различных народов, а также концлагеря), предлагать теодицеи для оправдания случившегося стало оскорбительным и унизительным для тех, кто подобный опыт зла пережил. Автор статьи обращается к эссе Эммануэля Левинаса «Бесполезное страдание…
The Problem of Epistemic Disagreement in Contemporary Philosophy of Religion Part II
In this article I focus on the problem of religious disagreement – whether one should loose one’s confidence in his or her religious beliefs in the face of significant disagreement on certain religious issues. The article consists of two large parts. In the first, I describe the main categories of the epistemology of disagreement in the focus of religious disagreement (first-order and higher-level significance of evidences in disagreement, fun…
The Problem of Epistemic Disagreement in Contemporary Philosophy of Religion Part I
In this article I focus on the problem of religious disagreement – whether one should lose one’s confidence in his or her religious beliefs in the face of significant disagreement on certain religious issues. The article consists of two large parts. In the first one, the author describes the main categories of the epistemology of disagreement in the focus of religious disagreement (first-order and higher-level significance of evidences in disag…
The Modal Critique of the Ontological Argument. Thomas Aquinas vs Anselm of Canterbury
This article examines Thomas Aquinas’s critique of Anselm of Canterbury’s ontological argument, focusing particularly on its modal aspects. While Aquinas’s traditional objections (the fallacy of begging the question and the non-self-evidence of God’s definition) have been thoroughly studied, their modal interpretation requires further analysis. The article demonstrates that Aquinas rejects Anselm’s argument because it conflates the ontological ne…
Theology and Philosophy of Evil (4 works) · Philosophy (3 works) · Sociology (3 works) · Epistemology (2 works) · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (2 works) · Face (sociological concept) (2 works) · Focus (optics) (2 works) · Order (exchange) (2 works) · Philosophy of religion (2 works) · Religious belief (2 works)