Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Kirill V Karpov

Biographic Data

ID8883280
NAMEKirill V Karpov
GIVEN NAMESKirill V
FAMILY NAMEKarpov
SIGNATUREKARPOV K V
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS4
TOTAL CITATIONS0
WORKS AS AUTHOR4
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2020
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2025
H-INDEX0
  • The Modal Critique of the Ontological Argument. Thomas Aquinas vs Anselm of Canterbury

    Kirill Karpov, Kirill V Karpov•ARTICLE•Studia Religiosa Rossica•2025

    This article examines Thomas Aquinas’s critique of Anselm of Canterbury’s ontological argument, focusing particularly on its modal aspects. While Aquinas’s traditional objections (the fallacy of begging the question and the non-self-evidence of God’s definition) have been thoroughly studied, their modal interpretation requires further analysis. The article demonstrates that Aquinas rejects Anselm’s argument because it conflates the ontological ne…

  • The Problem of Epistemic Disagreement in Contemporary Philosophy of Religion Part II

    Kirill Karpov, Kirill V Karpov•ARTICLE•Voprosy Filosofii•2023

    In this article I focus on the problem of religious disagreement – whether one should loose one’s confidence in his or her religious beliefs in the face of signi­ficant disagreement on certain religious issues. The article consists of two large parts. In the first, I describe the main categories of the epistemology of disagree­ment in the focus of religious disagreement (first-order and higher-level signific­ance of evidences in disagreement, fun…

  • The Problem of Epistemic Disagreement in Contemporary Philosophy of Religion Part I

    Kirill Karpov, Kirill V Karpov•ARTICLE•Voprosy Filosofii•2023

    In this article I focus on the problem of religious disagreement – whether one should lose one’s confidence in his or her religious beliefs in the face of signific­ant disagreement on certain religious issues. The article consists of two large parts. In the first one, the author describes the main categories of the epistemo­logy of disagreement in the focus of religious disagreement (first-order and higher-level significance of evidences in disag…

  • A moral problem for theodicies

    Open Access•Kirill Karpov, Kirill V Karpov•ARTICLE•Filosofskii Zhurnal•2020

    Одна из главных проблем в современных философии религии и этике касается того факта, что после случившихся в XX столетии событий, воплотивших в себе ужаса­ющие проявления зла (прежде всего, это геноцид в отношении различных народов, а также концлагеря), предлагать теодицеи для оправдания случившегося стало оскорбительным и унизительным для тех, кто подобный опыт зла пережил. Автор статьи обращается к эссе Эммануэля Левинаса «Бесполезное страдание…

No prominent works on this page.

  • A moral problem for theodicies

    Open Access•Kirill Karpov, Kirill V Karpov•ARTICLE•Filosofskii Zhurnal•2020

    Одна из главных проблем в современных философии религии и этике касается того факта, что после случившихся в XX столетии событий, воплотивших в себе ужаса­ющие проявления зла (прежде всего, это геноцид в отношении различных народов, а также концлагеря), предлагать теодицеи для оправдания случившегося стало оскорбительным и унизительным для тех, кто подобный опыт зла пережил. Автор статьи обращается к эссе Эммануэля Левинаса «Бесполезное страдание…

  • The Problem of Epistemic Disagreement in Contemporary Philosophy of Religion Part II

    Kirill Karpov, Kirill V Karpov•ARTICLE•Voprosy Filosofii•2023

    In this article I focus on the problem of religious disagreement – whether one should loose one’s confidence in his or her religious beliefs in the face of signi­ficant disagreement on certain religious issues. The article consists of two large parts. In the first, I describe the main categories of the epistemology of disagree­ment in the focus of religious disagreement (first-order and higher-level signific­ance of evidences in disagreement, fun…

  • The Problem of Epistemic Disagreement in Contemporary Philosophy of Religion Part I

    Kirill Karpov, Kirill V Karpov•ARTICLE•Voprosy Filosofii•2023

    In this article I focus on the problem of religious disagreement – whether one should lose one’s confidence in his or her religious beliefs in the face of signific­ant disagreement on certain religious issues. The article consists of two large parts. In the first one, the author describes the main categories of the epistemo­logy of disagreement in the focus of religious disagreement (first-order and higher-level significance of evidences in disag…

  • The Modal Critique of the Ontological Argument. Thomas Aquinas vs Anselm of Canterbury

    Kirill Karpov, Kirill V Karpov•ARTICLE•Studia Religiosa Rossica•2025

    This article examines Thomas Aquinas’s critique of Anselm of Canterbury’s ontological argument, focusing particularly on its modal aspects. While Aquinas’s traditional objections (the fallacy of begging the question and the non-self-evidence of God’s definition) have been thoroughly studied, their modal interpretation requires further analysis. The article demonstrates that Aquinas rejects Anselm’s argument because it conflates the ontological ne…

Theology and Philosophy of Evil (4 works) · Philosophy (3 works) · Sociology (3 works) · Epistemology (2 works) · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (2 works) · Face (sociological concept) (2 works) · Focus (optics) (2 works) · Order (exchange) (2 works) · Philosophy of religion (2 works) · Religious belief (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae