Vladimir V Sidorin
Biographic Data
| ID | 8883862 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Vladimir V Sidorin |
| GIVEN NAMES | Vladimir V |
| FAMILY NAME | Sidorin |
| SIGNATURE | SIDORIN V V |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 4 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 4 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2021 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2023 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
On the way to overcoming the gaps
The frequent opposition of “philosophy in Russia” and “Russian philosophy” is considered by the author as a counterproductive dilemma that prevents the natural interaction of the cultural and historical originality of national philosophizing and world philosophical culture. The most important point in this regard is the need of depoliticization and deideologization of discussions about the Russian philosophical heritage. One of the key problem…
The Concrete Idealism of Sergei Trubetskoy and the Idea of Concreteness in Russian Philosophy. “Round table” materials
In March 2022, the journal Voprosy filosofii and Educational fund of brothers Sergey and Evgeny Troubetski’s held a “round table” dedicated to the 160th anniversary of the birth of the Russian philosopher Prince Sergei Nikolaevich Troubetskoy (1862–1905). The participants identified the most relevant, significant aspects of the teachings of Sergey Nikolayevich and, at the same time, presented a holistic vision of his work. Participants focused…
Completion or Beginning. G. Shpet’s Historical Philosophy as the Foundation of the Institute of Philosophy
One of the most interesting pages in the creative biography of G.G. Shpet is his leadership in the Institute of Scientific Philosophy (1921–1923) – the topic which is only indicated, but not yet sufficiently researched today. The article attempts to characterize the intellectual and organizational efforts of G.G. Shpet as director of the Institute of Scientific Philosophy and demonstrate the importance of his activities for preserving the tradit…
Alexander Bogdanov at the Institute of the Scientific Philosophy
The author considers the activity of Alexander A. Bogdanov as a full member of the Institute of Scientific Philosophy, established in 1921. Special attention is paid to the line of radical denial of the actual meaning of philosophy, what was characteristic for Bogdanov’s works of those years. This topic was manifested in the article “From Religious Monism to Scientific One”, which was read at the Institute in February 1923 as Bogdanov’s scientifi…
No prominent works on this page.
Completion or Beginning. G. Shpet’s Historical Philosophy as the Foundation of the Institute of Philosophy
One of the most interesting pages in the creative biography of G.G. Shpet is his leadership in the Institute of Scientific Philosophy (1921–1923) – the topic which is only indicated, but not yet sufficiently researched today. The article attempts to characterize the intellectual and organizational efforts of G.G. Shpet as director of the Institute of Scientific Philosophy and demonstrate the importance of his activities for preserving the tradit…
Alexander Bogdanov at the Institute of the Scientific Philosophy
The author considers the activity of Alexander A. Bogdanov as a full member of the Institute of Scientific Philosophy, established in 1921. Special attention is paid to the line of radical denial of the actual meaning of philosophy, what was characteristic for Bogdanov’s works of those years. This topic was manifested in the article “From Religious Monism to Scientific One”, which was read at the Institute in February 1923 as Bogdanov’s scientifi…
The Concrete Idealism of Sergei Trubetskoy and the Idea of Concreteness in Russian Philosophy. “Round table” materials
In March 2022, the journal Voprosy filosofii and Educational fund of brothers Sergey and Evgeny Troubetski’s held a “round table” dedicated to the 160th anniversary of the birth of the Russian philosopher Prince Sergei Nikolaevich Troubetskoy (1862–1905). The participants identified the most relevant, significant aspects of the teachings of Sergey Nikolayevich and, at the same time, presented a holistic vision of his work. Participants focused…
On the way to overcoming the gaps
The frequent opposition of “philosophy in Russia” and “Russian philosophy” is considered by the author as a counterproductive dilemma that prevents the natural interaction of the cultural and historical originality of national philosophizing and world philosophical culture. The most important point in this regard is the need of depoliticization and deideologization of discussions about the Russian philosophical heritage. One of the key problem…
Epistemology (4 works) · Philosophy (4 works) · History (3 works) · Law (3 works) · Sociology (3 works) · Context (archaeology) (2 works) · Educational Innovations and Challenges (2 works) · History, Medicine, and Leadership (2 works) · Management (2 works) · Modern philosophy (2 works)