Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Eva Hartell

Biographic Data

ID8901515
NAMEEva Hartell
GIVEN NAMESEva
FAMILY NAMEHartell
SIGNATUREHARTELL E
AFFILIATIONSKTH Royal Institute of Technology
ORCID0000-0002-8889-2562
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS2
TOTAL CITATIONS0
WORKS AS AUTHOR2
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2025
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2026
H-INDEX0
  • Making evaluative legal judgements

    Open Access•Kjetil Egelandsdal, Guri Lindblad et al.•ARTICLE•Assessment in Education:…•2026

    This study examines second-year law students’ experiences of evaluating administrative decisions across two successive course implementations. In 2023 (N=250), students were randomly assigned to either an Independent Scoring Format (ISF), where they rated individual decisions, or Comparative Judgement (CJ), where they compared pairs of decisions. Post-activity survey data, including open-ended responses, were analysed for both groups. In 2024 (N=…

  • Exploring the practical feasibility of adaptive comparative judgment as a summative assessment method

    Open Access•Kjetil Egelandsdal, Eva Hartell et al.•ARTICLE•Assessment & Evaluation in Higher…•2025

    This study explores the practical feasibility of Adaptive Comparative Judgment (ACJ) as a summative assessment method in legal education, focusing on a Property and Intellectual Property Law course at a Norwegian university. Eight examiners assessed 300 student responses using ACJ within traditional time constraints, performing pairwise comparisons to rank submissions by quality. Findings reveal that examiners completed fewer comparisons than req…

No prominent works on this page.

  • Exploring the practical feasibility of adaptive comparative judgment as a summative assessment method

    Open Access•Kjetil Egelandsdal, Eva Hartell et al.•ARTICLE•Assessment & Evaluation in Higher…•2025

    This study explores the practical feasibility of Adaptive Comparative Judgment (ACJ) as a summative assessment method in legal education, focusing on a Property and Intellectual Property Law course at a Norwegian university. Eight examiners assessed 300 student responses using ACJ within traditional time constraints, performing pairwise comparisons to rank submissions by quality. Findings reveal that examiners completed fewer comparisons than req…

  • Making evaluative legal judgements

    Open Access•Kjetil Egelandsdal, Guri Lindblad et al.•ARTICLE•Assessment in Education:…•2026

    This study examines second-year law students’ experiences of evaluating administrative decisions across two successive course implementations. In 2023 (N=250), students were randomly assigned to either an Independent Scoring Format (ISF), where they rated individual decisions, or Comparative Judgement (CJ), where they compared pairs of decisions. Post-activity survey data, including open-ended responses, were analysed for both groups. In 2024 (N=…

Formative assessment (2 works) · Clinical judgement (1 work) · Cognition (1 work) · Computer Science (1 work) · Conflict Management and Negotiation (1 work) · Engineering (1 work) · Evaluation and Performance Assessment (1 work) · Evaluation methods (1 work) · Judgement (1 work) · Legal Education and Practice Innovations (1 work)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae