Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Karin Enflo

Biographic Data

ID8995642
NAMEKarin Enflo
GIVEN NAMESKarin
FAMILY NAMEEnflo
SIGNATUREENFLO K
AFFILIATIONSStockholm University
ORCID0000-0001-9093-3995
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS6
TOTAL CITATIONS0
WORKS AS AUTHOR6
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2020
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2026
H-INDEX0
  • Measures to avoid the repugnant conclusion

    Open Access•Karin Enflo•ARTICLE•Economics and Philosophy•2026

    Many social welfare measures will sometimes rank a large population of very well-faring people below a very large population of barely well-faring people. Thus, they entail the repugnant conclusion . If such rankings are indeed repugnant, there must be some mistake behind measures that imply them. This paper discusses what that mistake might be. After rejecting other proposals, I suggest that the mistaken assumption is that welfare values that ar…

  • Measuring one-dimensional diversity

    Open Access•Karin Enflo•ARTICLE•Inquiry•2026

    A large number of diversity measures have been proposed in the literature, almost all of which are designed for sets with elements that differ in multiple aspects. However, these types of measures are not appropriate for sets with elements that differ in a single aspect only, such as duration, value or probability. In this essay I present a new measure of diversity, designed specifically for single aspect diversity. The measure captures the intui…

  • Measuring Social Welfare by Proximity to an Optimum Population

    Open Access•Karin Enflo•ARTICLE•Pacific philosophical quarterly•2023

    This essay introduces a new type of measure of social welfare, where populations are evaluated by their resemblance to an optimum population , which is an (in principle) possible population with the highest degree of social welfare, relative to some circumstances. Here, it is argued to be the largest possible population where everyone fares maximally well. The new measure is responsive to quality of welfare, equality of welfare and the number of …

  • The Equivalence of Egalitarianism and Prioritarianism

    Open Access•Karin Enflo•ARTICLE•Journal of Ethics and Social…•2022

    In this essay I argue that even though egalitarianism and prioritarianism are different theories of social welfare, they can use the same social welfare measures. I present six different arguments for this thesis. The first argument is that conceptual connections between egalitarianism and prioritarianism ensure that any measure that works for either theory works for both. The second argument is that conditions necessary and sufficient to identif…

  • Quantity, quality, equality

    Open Access•Karin Enflo•ARTICLE•Social Choice and Welfare•2021

    In this essay I propose a new measure of social welfare. It captures the intuitive idea that quantity , quality , and equality of individual welfare all matter for social welfare. More precisely, it satisfies six conditions: Equivalence , Dominance , Quality , Strict Monotonicity , Equality and Asymmetry . These state that (i) populations equivalent in individual welfare are equal in social welfare; (ii) a population that dominates another in ind…

  • Measures of Similarity

    Open Access•Karin Enflo•ARTICLE•Theoria•2020

    This article analyses the relationship between the concept of single aspect similarity and proposed measures of similarity. More precisely, it compares eleven measures of similarity in terms of how well they satisfy a list of desiderata, chosen to capture common intuitions concerning the properties of similarity and the relations between similarity and dissimilarity. Three types of measures are discussed: similarity as commonality, similarity as …

No prominent works on this page.

  • Measures of Similarity

    Open Access•Karin Enflo•ARTICLE•Theoria•2020

    This article analyses the relationship between the concept of single aspect similarity and proposed measures of similarity. More precisely, it compares eleven measures of similarity in terms of how well they satisfy a list of desiderata, chosen to capture common intuitions concerning the properties of similarity and the relations between similarity and dissimilarity. Three types of measures are discussed: similarity as commonality, similarity as …

  • Quantity, quality, equality

    Open Access•Karin Enflo•ARTICLE•Social Choice and Welfare•2021

    In this essay I propose a new measure of social welfare. It captures the intuitive idea that quantity , quality , and equality of individual welfare all matter for social welfare. More precisely, it satisfies six conditions: Equivalence , Dominance , Quality , Strict Monotonicity , Equality and Asymmetry . These state that (i) populations equivalent in individual welfare are equal in social welfare; (ii) a population that dominates another in ind…

  • The Equivalence of Egalitarianism and Prioritarianism

    Open Access•Karin Enflo•ARTICLE•Journal of Ethics and Social…•2022

    In this essay I argue that even though egalitarianism and prioritarianism are different theories of social welfare, they can use the same social welfare measures. I present six different arguments for this thesis. The first argument is that conceptual connections between egalitarianism and prioritarianism ensure that any measure that works for either theory works for both. The second argument is that conditions necessary and sufficient to identif…

  • Measuring Social Welfare by Proximity to an Optimum Population

    Open Access•Karin Enflo•ARTICLE•Pacific philosophical quarterly•2023

    This essay introduces a new type of measure of social welfare, where populations are evaluated by their resemblance to an optimum population , which is an (in principle) possible population with the highest degree of social welfare, relative to some circumstances. Here, it is argued to be the largest possible population where everyone fares maximally well. The new measure is responsive to quality of welfare, equality of welfare and the number of …

  • Measures to avoid the repugnant conclusion

    Open Access•Karin Enflo•ARTICLE•Economics and Philosophy•2026

    Many social welfare measures will sometimes rank a large population of very well-faring people below a very large population of barely well-faring people. Thus, they entail the repugnant conclusion . If such rankings are indeed repugnant, there must be some mistake behind measures that imply them. This paper discusses what that mistake might be. After rejecting other proposals, I suggest that the mistaken assumption is that welfare values that ar…

  • Measuring one-dimensional diversity

    Open Access•Karin Enflo•ARTICLE•Inquiry•2026

    A large number of diversity measures have been proposed in the literature, almost all of which are designed for sets with elements that differ in multiple aspects. However, these types of measures are not appropriate for sets with elements that differ in a single aspect only, such as duration, value or probability. In this essay I present a new measure of diversity, designed specifically for single aspect diversity. The measure captures the intui…

Computer Science (4 works) · Mathematics (4 works) · Biology (3 works) · Economics (3 works) · Income, Poverty, and Inequality (3 works) · Political science (3 works) · Population (3 works) · Social Welfare (3 works) · Sociology (3 works) · Welfare (3 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae