David G Dick
Biographic Data
| ID | 900356 |
|---|---|
| NAME | David G Dick |
| GIVEN NAMES | David G |
| FAMILY NAME | Dick |
| SIGNATURE | DICK D G |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Calgary |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 2 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 3 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2019 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2021 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Money and mental contents
What Money Is and Ought To Be
Teleological thinking about money reasons from what money is for to both how it ought to be used and what forms it should take. One type, found in Aristotle's argument against usury, takes teleological considerations alone to decisively settle normative questions. Another type, found in Locke's argument about monetary durability, takes teleological considerations to contribute to the settling of normative questions, but sees them as one considera…
Hunger, Need, and the Boundaries of Lockean Property
Locke’s property rights are now usually understood to be both fundamental and strictly negative. Fundamental because they are thought to be basic constraints on what we may do, unconstrained by anything deeper. Negative because they are thought to only protect a property holder against the claims of others. Here, I argue that this widespread interpretation is mistaken. For Locke, property rights are constrained by the deeper ‘fundamental law of n…
Money and mental contents
What Money Is and Ought To Be
Teleological thinking about money reasons from what money is for to both how it ought to be used and what forms it should take. One type, found in Aristotle's argument against usury, takes teleological considerations alone to decisively settle normative questions. Another type, found in Locke's argument about monetary durability, takes teleological considerations to contribute to the settling of normative questions, but sees them as one considera…
Hunger, Need, and the Boundaries of Lockean Property
Locke’s property rights are now usually understood to be both fundamental and strictly negative. Fundamental because they are thought to be basic constraints on what we may do, unconstrained by anything deeper. Negative because they are thought to only protect a property holder against the claims of others. Here, I argue that this widespread interpretation is mistaken. For Locke, property rights are constrained by the deeper ‘fundamental law of n…
Money and mental contents
What Money Is and Ought To Be
Teleological thinking about money reasons from what money is for to both how it ought to be used and what forms it should take. One type, found in Aristotle's argument against usury, takes teleological considerations alone to decisively settle normative questions. Another type, found in Locke's argument about monetary durability, takes teleological considerations to contribute to the settling of normative questions, but sees them as one considera…
Epistemology (3 works) · Philosophy (3 works) · Economic Theory and Institutions (2 works) · Political Philosophy and Ethics (2 works) · Sociology (2 works) · American Constitutional Law and Politics (1 works) · Argument (complex analysis (1 works) · Chemistry (1 works) · Computer Science (1 works) · Economics (1 works)