Christopher Tancredi
Biographic Data
| ID | 9013664 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Christopher Tancredi |
| GIVEN NAMES | Christopher |
| FAMILY NAME | Tancredi |
| SIGNATURE | TANCREDI C |
| AFFILIATIONS | Keio University |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 2 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 2 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2021 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2022 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Belief or consequences
We argue for a new inference-based analysis of belief attribution in which the embedded proposition is inferable from, but need not directly identify, an underlying belief of the subject’s. The analysis accounts for attributions of belief in necessary truths and falsities, overcoming a major difficulty facing Hintikka (1962), and goes beyond Cresswell & von Stechow (1982) in accounting for intuitively valid inferable belief attributions. The anal…
The syntax and semantics of Japanese internally- and doubly-headed relatives
This paper proposes novel syntactic and semantic analyses of Japanese IHRCs and of a variety of DHRCs labelled ‘integrated.’ The analyses differ non-trivially from all earlier analyses known to us, both in orientation and in technical implementation, and their principal raison d’être is to capture, with minimal appeal to stipulation, the ways in which these two constructions differ from each other, from other relative constructions of Japanese, a…
No prominent works on this page.
The syntax and semantics of Japanese internally- and doubly-headed relatives
This paper proposes novel syntactic and semantic analyses of Japanese IHRCs and of a variety of DHRCs labelled ‘integrated.’ The analyses differ non-trivially from all earlier analyses known to us, both in orientation and in technical implementation, and their principal raison d’être is to capture, with minimal appeal to stipulation, the ways in which these two constructions differ from each other, from other relative constructions of Japanese, a…
Belief or consequences
We argue for a new inference-based analysis of belief attribution in which the embedded proposition is inferable from, but need not directly identify, an underlying belief of the subject’s. The analysis accounts for attributions of belief in necessary truths and falsities, overcoming a major difficulty facing Hintikka (1962), and goes beyond Cresswell & von Stechow (1982) in accounting for intuitively valid inferable belief attributions. The anal…
Artificial Intelligence (2 works) · Computer Science (2 works) · Linguistics (2 works) · Natural language processing (2 works) · Philosophy (2 works) · Psychology (2 works) · Ambiguity (1 work) · Appeal (1 work) · Attribution (1 work) · Epistemology (1 work)