Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

S Fonnes

Biographic Data

ID9039283
NAMES Fonnes
GIVEN NAMESS
FAMILY NAMEFonnes
SIGNATUREFONNES S
AFFILIATIONSHerlev Hospital
ORCID0000-0002-8757-831X
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS4
TOTAL CITATIONS0
WORKS AS AUTHOR4
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2023
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2025
H-INDEX0
  • Cochrane reviews received more online attention than other systematic reviews—except when published in leading medical journals

    Open Access•L O Rosengaard, Mikkel Zola Andersen et al.•ARTICLE•Scientometrics•2025

    Traditional bibliometric analyses focus on citation counts, co-authorships, and impact factors, which do not fully capture the real-world impact of an academic publication. An alternative is to consider metrics gathered by Altmetric, which provide insight into online attention and engagement. We aimed to examine the difference in the online reach of Cochrane reviews versus other systematic reviews through a bibliometric analysis and identify pote…

  • Patient Reflections on Participation in a Randomised Controlled Multimodal Prehabilitation Trial Before Ventral Hernia Repair

    Open Access•Sofie Anne-Marie Skovbo Jensen, S Fonnes et al.•ARTICLE•International Journal of…•2025

    Those who declined RCT participation generally had more elaborate and ambivalent reflections than those who had accepted. Addressing ambivalence regarding lifestyle change, personal benefits, and prioritising time might be a relevant focus point for increasing inclusion rates in prehabilitation RCTs and in clinical practice to increase patients' readiness for lifestyle change

  • Ethical concerns of including too few or too many participants in clinical studies

    Open Access•L O Rosengaard, S Fonnes et al.•ARTICLE•Ethics Medicine and Public Health•2024

  • Use of inactive Cochrane reviews in academia

    Open Access•Bodil Hoffmeyer, S Fonnes et al.•ARTICLE•Scientometrics•2023

    The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews is internationally recognized as one of the best sources of evidence within medical research. Nevertheless, a considerable amount of Cochrane reviews in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) have not been updated for more than 5.5 years and are therefore considered inactive. This study’s aim was to evaluate if these are still used in academia. The study included 7,729 Cochrane reviews from …

No prominent works on this page.

  • Use of inactive Cochrane reviews in academia

    Open Access•Bodil Hoffmeyer, S Fonnes et al.•ARTICLE•Scientometrics•2023

    The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews is internationally recognized as one of the best sources of evidence within medical research. Nevertheless, a considerable amount of Cochrane reviews in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) have not been updated for more than 5.5 years and are therefore considered inactive. This study’s aim was to evaluate if these are still used in academia. The study included 7,729 Cochrane reviews from …

  • Ethical concerns of including too few or too many participants in clinical studies

    Open Access•L O Rosengaard, S Fonnes et al.•ARTICLE•Ethics Medicine and Public Health•2024

  • Cochrane reviews received more online attention than other systematic reviews—except when published in leading medical journals

    Open Access•L O Rosengaard, Mikkel Zola Andersen et al.•ARTICLE•Scientometrics•2025

    Traditional bibliometric analyses focus on citation counts, co-authorships, and impact factors, which do not fully capture the real-world impact of an academic publication. An alternative is to consider metrics gathered by Altmetric, which provide insight into online attention and engagement. We aimed to examine the difference in the online reach of Cochrane reviews versus other systematic reviews through a bibliometric analysis and identify pote…

  • Patient Reflections on Participation in a Randomised Controlled Multimodal Prehabilitation Trial Before Ventral Hernia Repair

    Open Access•Sofie Anne-Marie Skovbo Jensen, S Fonnes et al.•ARTICLE•International Journal of…•2025

    Those who declined RCT participation generally had more elaborate and ambivalent reflections than those who had accepted. Addressing ambivalence regarding lifestyle change, personal benefits, and prioritising time might be a relevant focus point for increasing inclusion rates in prehabilitation RCTs and in clinical practice to increase patients' readiness for lifestyle change

Psychology (3 works) · Academic Writing and Publishing (2 works) · Computer Science (2 works) · Data science (2 works) · Information retrieval (2 works) · Library science (2 works) · Medicine (2 works) · Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (2 works) · Political science (2 works) · scientometrics and bibliometrics research (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae