Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Ralph L Rosnow

Biographic Data

ID91139
NAMERalph L Rosnow
GIVEN NAMESRalph L
FAMILY NAMERosnow
SIGNATUREROSNOW R L
AFFILIATIONSTemple University
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS58
TOTAL CITATIONS294
AUTHOR COUNT58
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1963
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2015
H-INDEX8
  • Experimenter and Subject Artifacts: Methodology

    Open Access•Ralph L Rosnow, David B Strohmetz•CHAPTER•International Encyclopedia of the…•2015

  • Writing Papers in Psychology

    Ralph L Rosnow, Mimi Rosnow•BOOK•Writing Papers in Psychology•2011

  • Rumor and gossip in interpersonal interaction and beyond: A social exchange perspective

    Ralph L Rosnow•CHAPTER•Behaving Badly•2001

  • Contrasts and Correlations in Effect-Size Estimation

    Open Access•Ralph L Rosnow, Robert Rosenthal et al.•ARTICLE•Psychological Science•2000

    This article describes procedures for presenting standardized measures of effect size when contrasts are used to ask focused questions of data. The simplest contrasts consist of comparisons of two samples (e.g., based on the independent t statistic). Useful effect-size indices in this situation are members of the g family (e.g., Hedges's g and Cohen's d) and the Pearson r. We review expressions for calculating these measures and for transforming …

  • Rumor Rest Stops on the Information Highway Transmission Patterns in a Computer-Mediated Rumor Chain

    Open Access•Prashant Bordia, Ralph L Rosnow•ARTICLE•Human Communication Research•1998•Cited by: 15•References: 29

    Classic simulation studies of rumor transmission chains often have been characterized as lacking mundane realism. The present study spawned new insights on the basis of an analysis of the structure and composition of a naturalistic rumor chain that surfaced on the information highway. Content analyses of the individual messages during a 6-day period revealed distinctive patterns in both content and level of individual participation. In general, t…

  • Computing contrasts, effect sizes, and counternulls on other people's published data: General procedures for research consumers.

    Ralph L Rosnow, Robert Rosenthal•ARTICLE•Psychological Methods•1996

    We describe convenient statistical procedures that will enable research consumers (e.g,, professional psychologists, graduate students, and researchers themselves) to reach beyond the published conclusions and make an independent assessment of the reported results. Appropriately conceived contrasts accompanied by effect size estimates often allow researchers to address precise predictions that the authors of the published report may have ignored …

  • Interpersonal Expectations: Theory, Research and Applications

    Open Access•Peter Blanck, Robert Rosenthal et al.•BOOK•Interpersonal Expectations•1993

    This 1993 volume brings together critical analysis of the phenomenon called interpersonal expectation - a sub-area of social psychology that studies how the expectations of one person affects the behavior of another in an interactive setting. The book is divided into three major sections: the first examines real-world applications of research on interpersonal expectations, such as in the courtroom, classroom, and operating room; the second consid…

  • The Institutional Review Board as a mirror of scientific and ethical standards

    Ralph L Rosnow, Mary J Rotheram-Borus et al.•ARTICLE•American Psychologist•1993

  • The Institutional Review Board as a mirror of scientific and ethical standards

    Ralph L Rosnow, Mary J Rotheram-Borus et al.•ARTICLE•American Psychologist•1993

    Decisions by institutional review boards (IRBs) are presumed to reflect the norms and standards of the scientific community. Such criteria have shifted as changes have occurred in experimental interventions and protocols, codes of federal regulatory agencies, norms among investigators, and expectations of participants. The tension created by shifting norms and standards raises two questions: (a) Should IRBs evaluate the scientific (e.g., design) …

  • Scientific rewards and conflicts of ethical choices in human subjects research

    Peter Blanck, Peter David Blanck et al.•ARTICLE•American Psychologist•1992

  • If you're looking at the cell means, you're not looking at only the interaction (unless all main effects are zero)

    Ralph L Rosnow, Robert Rosenthal•ARTICLE•Psychological Bulletin•1991

  • Inside rumor: A personal journey

    Ralph L Rosnow•ARTICLE•American Psychologist•1991•Cited by: 33•References: 10

  • If you're looking at the cell means, you're not looking at only the interaction (unless all main effects are zero)

    Ralph L Rosnow, Robert Rosenthal•ARTICLE•Psychological Bulletin•1991•Cited by: 7

    This reply to Meyer explains again that cell means, although usually the results of greatest interest, should not be confused with interaction effects. Unless all main effects are 0, one cannot accurately interpret an interaction by plotting the cell means. To interpret an interaction, it is the residuals remaining after removal of constituent effects (e.g., row and column effects in 2-factor analyses) that must be examined

  • Statistical procedures and the justification of knowledge in psychological science

    Ralph L Rosnow, Robert Rosenthal•ARTICLE•American Psychologist•1989•Cited by: 77•References: 5

  • Definition and interpretation of interaction effects

    Ralph L Rosnow, Robert Rosenthal•ARTICLE•Psychological Bulletin•1989•Cited by: 21

    When interaction is claimed in a factorial arrangement, the results almost always require more detailed analysis than is typically reported in our primary journals. In reporting interactions, research psychologists have gotten into the habit of examining only the differences between the original cell means (the simple effects) instead of more properly examining the residuals, or leftover effects, after the lower order effects have been removed. T…

  • Rumor as Communication: A Contextualist Approach

    Open Access•Ralph L Rosnow•ARTICLE•Journal of Communication•1988

    A consideration of rumor as “a process of explanation” reviews and integrates a range of findings on bow four conditions-personal anxiety, general uncertainly, credulity, and topical importance-affect and may even predict rumor generation and transmission

  • What is aggressive? some contextual factors in judging international behavior

    Open Access•Peter B Crabb, Ralph L Rosnow•ARTICLE•Aggressive Behavior•1988•References: 8

    This research delineates several factors that may affect how likely observers are to judge some international actions as aggressive. Subjects rated scenarios in which a country intercedes in the affairs of another country experiencing internal or external difficulties. Judged to be more aggressive, as hypothesized, were actions in which it was “they” rather than “we” who were responsible, actions capable of causing injury or death, and actions ca…

  • Contextualism and its implications for psychological inquiry

    Open Access•Marianne E Jaeger, Ralph L Rosnow•ARTICLE•British Journal of Psychology•1988•Cited by: 7

    A variety of alternative orientations to psychological inquiry have arisen in response to attacks on mechanistic and reductionistic assumptions about human activity. Despite their differences, these alternative viewpoints seem to be converging on a set of common themes that can be subsumed within a world view known as contextualism. This paper examines the basic assumptions and principles of a contextualist perspective, highlighting its emphasis …

  • Factors influencing rumor spreading: Replication and extension

    Open Access•Ralph L Rosnow, James L Esposito et al.•ARTICLE•Language & Communication•1988•Cited by: 4•References: 22

  • Beyond Analysis of Variance

    Gudmund R Iversen, Alan J Klockars et al.•ARTICLE•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1987

  • Synthetic Benevolence and Malevolence as Strategies of Relational Compliance-Gaining

    Open Access•Samuel S K Fung, David Kipnis et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Social and Personal…•1987•Cited by: 2•References: 13

    A questionnaire study was conducted in which subjects described, and rated on several scales, incidents they recalled in which they had been either `synthetically benevolent' or `malevolent' when trying to influence others. `Synthetic benevolence' is a positive or prosocial act that is not what it appears to be, whilst `synthetic malevolence' is a negative or antisocial act that is not what it appears to be. As hypothesized, synthetic benevolence…

  • Interpretation of significance levels and effect sizes by psychological researchers

    Nanette Nelson, Robert Rosenthal et al.•ARTICLE•American Psychologist•1986

  • Interpretation of significance levels and effect sizes by psychological researchers

    Nanette Nelson, Robert Rosenthal et al.•ARTICLE•American Psychologist•1986

  • Belief in rumor and likelihood of rumor transmission

    Open Access•Ralph L Rosnow, John H Yost et al.•ARTICLE•Language & Communication•1986•Cited by: 9•References: 6

  • The Emergence of Contextualism

    Open Access•Marianthi Georgoudi, Ralph L Rosnow•ARTICLE•Journal of Communication•1985

    Marianthi Georgoudi, Ralph L. Rosnow; The Emergence of Contextualism, Journal of Communication, Volume 35, Issue 1, 1 March 1985, Pages 76–88, https://doi

Next
  • Statistical procedures and the justification of knowledge in psychological science

    Ralph L Rosnow, Robert Rosenthal•ARTICLE•American Psychologist•1989•Cited by: 77•References: 5

  • Psychology of rumor reconsidered

    Ralph L Rosnow•ARTICLE•Psychological Bulletin•1980•Cited by: 34•References: 13

  • Inside rumor: A personal journey

    Ralph L Rosnow•ARTICLE•American Psychologist•1991•Cited by: 33•References: 10

  • Gossip and Marketplace Psychology

    Open Access•Ralph L Rosnow•ARTICLE•Journal of Communication•1977•Cited by: 25•References: 5

    Journal Article Gossip and Marketplace Psychology Get access Ralph L. Rosnow Ralph L. Rosnow 1Ralph Rosnow is Professor of Psychology at Temple University and co-author of Rumor and Gossip: The Social Psychology of Hearsay (Elsevier, 1976) Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Journal of Communication, Volume 27, Issue 1, March 1977, Pages 158-163, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1977.tb01811.x Published: 07…

  • Definition and interpretation of interaction effects

    Ralph L Rosnow, Robert Rosenthal•ARTICLE•Psychological Bulletin•1989•Cited by: 21

    When interaction is claimed in a factorial arrangement, the results almost always require more detailed analysis than is typically reported in our primary journals. In reporting interactions, research psychologists have gotten into the habit of examining only the differences between the original cell means (the simple effects) instead of more properly examining the residuals, or leftover effects, after the lower order effects have been removed. T…

  • Rumor and gossip: The Social Psychology of Hearsay

    Gary Alan Fine, Ralph L Rosnow•BOOK•Rumor and gossip•1976•Cited by: 19

  • Rumor Rest Stops on the Information Highway Transmission Patterns in a Computer-Mediated Rumor Chain

    Open Access•Prashant Bordia, Ralph L Rosnow•ARTICLE•Human Communication Research•1998•Cited by: 15•References: 29

    Classic simulation studies of rumor transmission chains often have been characterized as lacking mundane realism. The present study spawned new insights on the basis of an analysis of the structure and composition of a naturalistic rumor chain that surfaced on the information highway. Content analyses of the individual messages during a 6-day period revealed distinctive patterns in both content and level of individual participation. In general, t…

  • Belief in rumor and likelihood of rumor transmission

    Open Access•Ralph L Rosnow, John H Yost et al.•ARTICLE•Language & Communication•1986•Cited by: 9•References: 6

  • If you're looking at the cell means, you're not looking at only the interaction (unless all main effects are zero)

    Ralph L Rosnow, Robert Rosenthal•ARTICLE•Psychological Bulletin•1991•Cited by: 7

    This reply to Meyer explains again that cell means, although usually the results of greatest interest, should not be confused with interaction effects. Unless all main effects are 0, one cannot accurately interpret an interaction by plotting the cell means. To interpret an interaction, it is the residuals remaining after removal of constituent effects (e.g., row and column effects in 2-factor analyses) that must be examined

  • Contextualism and its implications for psychological inquiry

    Open Access•Marianne E Jaeger, Ralph L Rosnow•ARTICLE•British Journal of Psychology•1988•Cited by: 7

    A variety of alternative orientations to psychological inquiry have arisen in response to attacks on mechanistic and reductionistic assumptions about human activity. Despite their differences, these alternative viewpoints seem to be converging on a set of common themes that can be subsumed within a world view known as contextualism. This paper examines the basic assumptions and principles of a contextualist perspective, highlighting its emphasis …

  • The prophetic vision of Giambattista Vico: Implications for the state of social psychological theory

    Ralph L Rosnow•ARTICLE•Journal of Personality and Social…•1978•Cited by: 5

  • Adding versus averaging as a stimulus-combination rule in forming impressions of groups

    Ralph L Rosnow, Robert L Arms•ARTICLE•Journal of Personality and Social…•1968•Cited by: 5•References: 5

  • Volunteer Subjects and the Results of Opinion Change Studies

    Open Access•Ralph L Rosnow, Robert Rosenthal•ARTICLE•Psychological Reports•1966•Cited by: 5

    Female volunteers and nonvolunteers for a (fictitious) perception experiment participated in a study of opinion change. Opinions about college fraternities were measured before and after the receipt of pro-fraternity, anti-fraternity, or no (control) communication. Volunteers reacted differently from nonvolunteers to pro- and to anti-fraternity communications. In addition, volunteers' opinions were significantly less reliable than the opinions of…

  • Factors influencing rumor spreading: Replication and extension

    Open Access•Ralph L Rosnow, James L Esposito et al.•ARTICLE•Language & Communication•1988•Cited by: 4•References: 22

  • Cognitive set and message processing: Implications of prose memory research for rumor theory

    Open Access•James L Esposito, Ralph L Rosnow•ARTICLE•Language & Communication•1984•Cited by: 4•References: 39

  • Punitiveness in response to films varying in content: A cross‐national field study of aggression

    Open Access•Jeffrey H Goldstein, Ralph L Rosnow et al.•ARTICLE•European Journal of Social…•1975•Cited by: 4•References: 20

    Punitiveness in male movie‐goers in London, Philadelphia, Rome and Toronto was measured before or after they attended films varying in content (aggressive, sexual, neutral) and arousal potential (low, high). A second dependent variable, altruism, was also assessed for some Ss. Hypotheses stemming from social learning theory and arousal theory were tested by comparing changes in punitiveness at aggressive, nonaggressive arousing (sexual) and nonag…

  • One-Sided Versus Two-Sided Communication Under Indirect Awareness of Persuasive Intent

    Ralph L Rosnow•ARTICLE•Public Opinion Quarterly•1968•Cited by: 4

    Journal Article ONE-SIDED VERSUS TWO-SIDED COMMUNICATION UNDER INDIRECT AWARENESS OF PERSUASIVE INTENT Get access RALPH L. ROSNOW RALPH L. ROSNOW † Ralph L. Rosnow is Associate Professor in the Department of Psychology at Temple University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Public Opinion Quarterly, Volume 32, Issue 1, SPRING 1968, Pages 95–101, https://doi.org/10.1086/267582 Published: 01 January 1968

  • Reactive effects of pretesting in attitude research

    Ralph L Rosnow, Jerry Suls et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Personality and Social…•1970•Cited by: 3•References: 8

  • Differential Effects of Complementary and Competing Variables in Primacy-Recency

    Ralph L Rosnow, Robert F Holz et al.•ARTICLE•The Journal of Social Psychology•1966•Cited by: 3•References: 3

  • Complementary and Competing-Order Effects in Opinion Change

    Ralph L Rosnow, Robert E Lana•ARTICLE•The Journal of Social Psychology•1965•Cited by: 3•References: 1

  • Synthetic Benevolence and Malevolence as Strategies of Relational Compliance-Gaining

    Open Access•Samuel S K Fung, David Kipnis et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Social and Personal…•1987•Cited by: 2•References: 13

    A questionnaire study was conducted in which subjects described, and rated on several scales, incidents they recalled in which they had been either `synthetically benevolent' or `malevolent' when trying to influence others. `Synthetic benevolence' is a positive or prosocial act that is not what it appears to be, whilst `synthetic malevolence' is a negative or antisocial act that is not what it appears to be. As hypothesized, synthetic benevolence…

  • Mediation of artifacts in behavioral research

    Open Access•Ralph L Rosnow, Leona S Aiken•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Social…•1973•Cited by: 2•References: 79

  • More on the social psychology of the experiment: When compliance turns to self-defense

    Ralph L Rosnow, Barry E Goodstadt et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Personality and Social…•1973•Cited by: 2

  • Personality and Group Impression Formation as a Function of the Amount of Overlap in Evaluative Meaning of the Stimulus Elements

    Ralph L Rosnow, Howard Wainer et al.•ARTICLE•Sociometry•1970•Cited by: 1

  • Subject Awareness and Order Effects in Persuasive Communications

    Open Access•Robert E Lana, Ralph L Rosnow•ARTICLE•Psychological Reports•1963

    This study was performed with 128 college students acting as Ss. The primary hypothesis that Ss confronted with a hidden pretest in an opinion change study will yield a significant recency effect, and Ss confronted with an exposed pretest will yield a significant primacy effect, was rejected. A primacy effect is in evidence when the pretest is hidden, and no directional effects are present when the pretest is exposed. The secondary hypothesis tha…

  • Spread of Effect of Reinforcement in Persuasive Communication

    Open Access•Ralph L Rosnow, Gordon Russell•ARTICLE•Psychological Reports•1963

    Seventy-eight high school students took part in an opinion change experiment using the topic “use of nuclear weapons.” After reading opposing persuasive communications to Ss “contiguously” prior to the presentation of a reinforcing event, subsequent opinion change was found to be statistically significant and in the direction of the one communication (either pro or con) that was more proximal to the reinforcement. This finding supports an hypothe…

  • A Delay-of-Reinforcement Effect in Persuasive Communication

    Ralph L Rosnow•ARTICLE•The Journal of Social Psychology•1965

  • Complementary and Competing-Order Effects in Opinion Change

    Ralph L Rosnow, Robert E Lana•ARTICLE•The Journal of Social Psychology•1965•Cited by: 3•References: 1

  • Whatever Happened to the “Law of Primacy”

    Open Access•Ralph L Rosnow•ARTICLE•Journal of Communication•1966

    Journal Article Whatever Happened to the “Law of Primacy”? Get access Ralph L. Rosnow Ralph L. Rosnow 1Ralph L. Rosnow is an Assistant Professor in the Division of Communication Research and Fellow in the Communication Research Center at Boston University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Journal of Communication, Volume 16, Issue 1, March 1966, Pages 10–31, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1966.tb00013.x…

  • Volunteer Subjects and the Results of Opinion Change Studies

    Open Access•Ralph L Rosnow, Robert Rosenthal•ARTICLE•Psychological Reports•1966•Cited by: 5

    Female volunteers and nonvolunteers for a (fictitious) perception experiment participated in a study of opinion change. Opinions about college fraternities were measured before and after the receipt of pro-fraternity, anti-fraternity, or no (control) communication. Volunteers reacted differently from nonvolunteers to pro- and to anti-fraternity communications. In addition, volunteers' opinions were significantly less reliable than the opinions of…

  • Differential Effects of Complementary and Competing Variables in Primacy-Recency

    Ralph L Rosnow, Robert F Holz et al.•ARTICLE•The Journal of Social Psychology•1966•Cited by: 3•References: 3

  • Awareness of Expectation in Attitude Research

    Open Access•Robert F Holz, Ralph L Rosnow•ARTICLE•Psychological Reports•1967

  • Effects of Pretest-Treatment Interval on Opinion Change

    Open Access•Robert E Lana, Ralph L Rosnow•ARTICLE•Psychological Reports•1968

    Data presented suggest that the interval between pretest and treatment (2 to 21 days) does not have a substantial effect on the magnitude of change of opinion by groups shown a persuasive communication

  • Consonant and dissonant communications as positive and negative reinforcements in opinion change

    John F Corrozi, Ralph L Rosnow•ARTICLE•Journal of Personality and Social…•1968•References: 3

  • Adding versus averaging as a stimulus-combination rule in forming impressions of groups

    Ralph L Rosnow, Robert L Arms•ARTICLE•Journal of Personality and Social…•1968•Cited by: 5•References: 5

  • One-Sided Versus Two-Sided Communication Under Indirect Awareness of Persuasive Intent

    Ralph L Rosnow•ARTICLE•Public Opinion Quarterly•1968•Cited by: 4

    Journal Article ONE-SIDED VERSUS TWO-SIDED COMMUNICATION UNDER INDIRECT AWARENESS OF PERSUASIVE INTENT Get access RALPH L. ROSNOW RALPH L. ROSNOW † Ralph L. Rosnow is Associate Professor in the Department of Psychology at Temple University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Public Opinion Quarterly, Volume 32, Issue 1, SPRING 1968, Pages 95–101, https://doi.org/10.1086/267582 Published: 01 January 1968

  • Volunteer Effects on Experimental Outcomes

    Open Access•Ralph L Rosnow, Robert Rosenthal et al.•ARTICLE•Educational and Psychological…•1969

  • Anderson's Personality-Trait Words Rated by Men and Women as a Function of Stimulus Sex

    Open Access•Ralph L Rosnow, Howard Wainer et al.•ARTICLE•Psychological Reports•1969

    Anderson's personality-trait words were rated for likeableness on a 101-point scale by 30 male and 30 female undergraduates instructed to regard the stimuli as characterizing either a man or a woman. Although the pooled means correlated highly with Anderson's mean ratings, inspection of the separate stimuli showed numerous appreciable rating differences attributable to Ss' sex and sex of stimulus. Eliminating such stimuli resulted in a list of 14…

  • Personality and Group Impression Formation as a Function of the Amount of Overlap in Evaluative Meaning of the Stimulus Elements

    Ralph L Rosnow, Howard Wainer et al.•ARTICLE•Sociometry•1970•Cited by: 1

  • Reactive effects of pretesting in attitude research

    Ralph L Rosnow, Jerry Suls et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Personality and Social…•1970•Cited by: 3•References: 8

  • More On the Reactive Effects of Pretesting in Attitude Research: Demand Characteristics or Subject Commitment

    Open Access•Ralph L Rosnow, Harvey M Holper et al.•ARTICLE•Educational and Psychological…•1973

  • Mediation of artifacts in behavioral research

    Open Access•Ralph L Rosnow, Leona S Aiken•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Social…•1973•Cited by: 2•References: 79

  • More on the social psychology of the experiment: When compliance turns to self-defense

    Ralph L Rosnow, Barry E Goodstadt et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Personality and Social…•1973•Cited by: 2

  • Taming of the volunteer problem: On coping with artifacts by benign neglect

    Ralph L Rosnow, Robert Rosenthal•ARTICLE•Journal of Personality and Social…•1974•References: 3

  • Punitiveness in response to films varying in content: A cross‐national field study of aggression

    Open Access•Jeffrey H Goldstein, Ralph L Rosnow et al.•ARTICLE•European Journal of Social…•1975•Cited by: 4•References: 20

    Punitiveness in male movie‐goers in London, Philadelphia, Rome and Toronto was measured before or after they attended films varying in content (aggressive, sexual, neutral) and arousal potential (low, high). A second dependent variable, altruism, was also assessed for some Ss. Hypotheses stemming from social learning theory and arousal theory were tested by comparing changes in punitiveness at aggressive, nonaggressive arousing (sexual) and nonag…

  • Rumor and gossip: The Social Psychology of Hearsay

    Gary Alan Fine, Ralph L Rosnow•BOOK•Rumor and gossip•1976•Cited by: 19

  • The Volunteer Subject

    James C Moore, Ralph L Rosnow•REVIEW•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1976

  • Fairs and psychology's wares

    Ralph L Rosnow•ARTICLE•American Psychologist•1977

  • Fairs and psychology's wares

    Ralph L Rosnow•ARTICLE•American Psychologist•1977

Psychology (52 works) · Social Psychology (37 works) · Social Psychology (21 works) · Computer Science (20 works) · Political science (14 works) · Cognitive psychology (13 works) · Philosophy (11 works) · Rumor (11 works) · Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (9 works) · Linguistics (8 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae