Anouk M Knops
Biographic Data
| ID | 9115021 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Anouk M Knops |
| GIVEN NAMES | Anouk M |
| FAMILY NAME | Knops |
| SIGNATURE | KNOPS A M |
| AFFILIATIONS | Netherlands Federation of University Medical Centres |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-4092-4163 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 2 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 2 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2019 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2019 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Implementation of the three good questions—A feasibility study in Dutch hospital departments
OBJECTIVES: To determine the feasibility of pragmatic implementation strategies for three good questions (in Dutch: Drie Goede Vragen; 3GV. What are my options; what are the risks and benefits related to these options; and what does this mean for my situation?) to increase shared decision-making (SDM) efforts in Dutch secondary care, and identify barriers and facilitators of implementation. METHODS: Convergent mixed-method design: pre-post survey…
Developing quality criteria for patient‐directed knowledge tools related to clinical practice guidelines. A development and consensus study
BACKGROUND: Patient-directed knowledge tools such as patient versions of guidelines and patient decision aids are increasingly developed to facilitate shared decision making. In this paper, we report how consensus was reached within the Netherlands on quality criteria for development, content and governance of these tools. METHOD: A 12-month development and consensus study. The consortium worked on four work packages: (a) reviewing existing crite…
No prominent works on this page.
Implementation of the three good questions—A feasibility study in Dutch hospital departments
OBJECTIVES: To determine the feasibility of pragmatic implementation strategies for three good questions (in Dutch: Drie Goede Vragen; 3GV. What are my options; what are the risks and benefits related to these options; and what does this mean for my situation?) to increase shared decision-making (SDM) efforts in Dutch secondary care, and identify barriers and facilitators of implementation. METHODS: Convergent mixed-method design: pre-post survey…
Developing quality criteria for patient‐directed knowledge tools related to clinical practice guidelines. A development and consensus study
BACKGROUND: Patient-directed knowledge tools such as patient versions of guidelines and patient decision aids are increasingly developed to facilitate shared decision making. In this paper, we report how consensus was reached within the Netherlands on quality criteria for development, content and governance of these tools. METHOD: A 12-month development and consensus study. The consortium worked on four work packages: (a) reviewing existing crite…
Medical education (2 works) · Medicine (2 works) · Mental Health and Patient Involvement (2 works) · Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (2 works) · Business (1 work) · Clinical practice guidelines implementation (1 work) · Computer Science (1 work) · Corporate governance (1 work) · Knowledge management (1 work) · Nursing (1 work)