James A Earles
Biographic Data
| ID | 9251733 |
|---|---|
| NAME | James A Earles |
| GIVEN NAMES | James A |
| FAMILY NAME | Earles |
| SIGNATURE | EARLES J A |
| AFFILIATIONS | Armstrong Laboratory Human Resources Directorate |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 3 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1992 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1993 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Little Incremental Validity for a Special Test of Abstract Symbolic Reasoning in an Air Force Intelligence Career Field
This study evaluated the predictive efficiency of the Radio Communication Aptitude Test (RCAT), a classification test used by the United States Air Force. Recruits are classified into two signals intelligence analyses jobs using this special test as well as scores from the general multiple aptitude test battery, the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB), given to all Air Force applicants. Using a sample of 776 students, linear models…
Special Test for Computer Programmers? Not Needed
This study evaluated the predictive efficiency of the Electronic Data Processing Test (EDPT), a classification test used by the United States Air Force. Recruits are classified into the computer programmer and operator fields using this special test as well as scores from the general multiple aptitude test battery, the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB), given to all Air Force applicants. Using a sample of 3,547 students, linear m…
The Predictive Validity of the Asvab for Training Grades
The validity of the ASVAB subtests and composites for grades in 150 military technical schools was investigated. Across all jobs and within the job categories of Mechanical, Administrative, General, and Electronics, after correction for range restriction, Arithmetic Reasoning was found to be the most valid subtest. Across all jobs and within the job categories, the Electronics composite or the General composite was the most valid composite
No prominent works on this page.
The Predictive Validity of the Asvab for Training Grades
The validity of the ASVAB subtests and composites for grades in 150 military technical schools was investigated. Across all jobs and within the job categories of Mechanical, Administrative, General, and Electronics, after correction for range restriction, Arithmetic Reasoning was found to be the most valid subtest. Across all jobs and within the job categories, the Electronics composite or the General composite was the most valid composite
Little Incremental Validity for a Special Test of Abstract Symbolic Reasoning in an Air Force Intelligence Career Field
This study evaluated the predictive efficiency of the Radio Communication Aptitude Test (RCAT), a classification test used by the United States Air Force. Recruits are classified into two signals intelligence analyses jobs using this special test as well as scores from the general multiple aptitude test battery, the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB), given to all Air Force applicants. Using a sample of 776 students, linear models…
Special Test for Computer Programmers? Not Needed
This study evaluated the predictive efficiency of the Electronic Data Processing Test (EDPT), a classification test used by the United States Air Force. Recruits are classified into the computer programmer and operator fields using this special test as well as scores from the general multiple aptitude test battery, the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB), given to all Air Force applicants. Using a sample of 3,547 students, linear m…
Predictive validity (3 works) · Psychology (3 works) · Aptitude (2 works) · Cognitive Abilities and Testing (2 works) · Developmental psychology (2 works) · Incremental validity (2 works) · Psychometrics (2 works) · Sample (material) (2 works) · Technology Assessment and Management (2 works) · Test (biology) (2 works)