LISA CAMPO‐ENGELSTEIN
Biographic Data
| ID | 9271332 |
|---|---|
| NAME | LISA CAMPO‐ENGELSTEIN |
| GIVEN NAMES | LISA |
| FAMILY NAME | CAMPO‐ENGELSTEIN |
| SIGNATURE | ENGELSTEIN L C |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 3 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2011 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2024 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Breaking Binaries
This commentary responds to Moti Gorin's article “What Is the Aim of Pediatric ‘Gender‐Affirming’ Care?” We argue that Gorin's case against pediatric gender‐affirming care rests upon numerous false conceptual binaries: female/male, public/private, objective/subjective, and medically necessary/elective. Drawing on feminist bioethics, we show how such dichotomous thinking is both inaccurate and marginalizing of gender minorities
Dueling Definitions of Abortifacient
Contraception works by preventing fertilization of an egg or preventing implantation of a fertilized embryo. For those who believe pregnancy begins at implantation, contraceptives preventing implantation are not abortifacient. However, for those who assert that pregnancy begins at fertilization, any agent causing the intentional loss of an embryo, even prior to implantation, is abortifacient, both morally and for lack of a different term to descr…
No More Larking Around! Why We Need Male Larcs
No prominent works on this page.
No More Larking Around! Why We Need Male Larcs
Dueling Definitions of Abortifacient
Contraception works by preventing fertilization of an egg or preventing implantation of a fertilized embryo. For those who believe pregnancy begins at implantation, contraceptives preventing implantation are not abortifacient. However, for those who assert that pregnancy begins at fertilization, any agent causing the intentional loss of an embryo, even prior to implantation, is abortifacient, both morally and for lack of a different term to descr…
Breaking Binaries
This commentary responds to Moti Gorin's article “What Is the Aim of Pediatric ‘Gender‐Affirming’ Care?” We argue that Gorin's case against pediatric gender‐affirming care rests upon numerous false conceptual binaries: female/male, public/private, objective/subjective, and medically necessary/elective. Drawing on feminist bioethics, we show how such dichotomous thinking is both inaccurate and marginalizing of gender minorities
Law (2 works) · Political science (2 works) · Psychology (2 works) · Reproductive Health and Contraception (2 works) · Social Psychology (2 works) · Sociology (2 works) · Abortifacient (1 work) · Abortion (1 work) · Affect (linguistics) (1 work) · Argument (complex analysis) (1 work)