Federico Casolari
Biographic Data
| ID | 9293402 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Federico Casolari |
| GIVEN NAMES | Federico |
| FAMILY NAME | Casolari |
| SIGNATURE | CASOLARI F |
| AFFILIATIONS | Zambon (Italy) |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-3281-5426 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 2 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 2 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2021 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2024 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Taking AI risks seriously
The EU Artificial Intelligence Act (AIA) defines four risk categories: unacceptable, high, limited, and minimal. However, as these categories statically depend on broad fields of application of AI, the risk magnitude may be wrongly estimated, and the AIA may not be enforced effectively. This problem is particularly challenging when it comes to regulating general-purpose AI (GPAI), which has versatile and often unpredictable applications. Recent a…
Safeguarding European values with digital sovereignty
The European Union (EU) has, with increasing frequency, outlined an intention to strengthen its "digital sovereignty" as a basis for safeguarding European values in the digital age. Yet, uncertainty remains as to how the term should be defined, undermining efforts to assess the success of the EU's digital sovereignty agenda. The task of this paper is to reduce this uncertainty by i) analysing how digital sovereignty has been discussed by EU insti…
No prominent works on this page.
Safeguarding European values with digital sovereignty
The European Union (EU) has, with increasing frequency, outlined an intention to strengthen its "digital sovereignty" as a basis for safeguarding European values in the digital age. Yet, uncertainty remains as to how the term should be defined, undermining efforts to assess the success of the EU's digital sovereignty agenda. The task of this paper is to reduce this uncertainty by i) analysing how digital sovereignty has been discussed by EU insti…
Taking AI risks seriously
The EU Artificial Intelligence Act (AIA) defines four risk categories: unacceptable, high, limited, and minimal. However, as these categories statically depend on broad fields of application of AI, the risk magnitude may be wrongly estimated, and the AIA may not be enforced effectively. This problem is particularly challenging when it comes to regulating general-purpose AI (GPAI), which has versatile and often unpredictable applications. Recent a…
Business (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Political science (2 works) · Compromise (1 work) · Computer Science (1 work) · Computer security (1 work) · Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies (1 work) · European union (1 work) · International trade (1 work) · Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting (1 work)