Martin Brecher
Biographic Data
| ID | 9406955 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Martin Brecher |
| GIVEN NAMES | Martin |
| FAMILY NAME | Brecher |
| SIGNATURE | BRECHER M |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Mannheim |
| ORCID | 0009-0009-2016-7741 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 2 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 2 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2025 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Allowed by Right, Forbidden by Ethics
In the Doctrine of Virtue, Kant raises the ‘casuistical’ question of whether sexual intercourse is ethically permissible only if it serves the purpose of procreation, or whether it is also permissible when procreation is not possible, e.g. during pregnancy. It might seem that Kant is assuming a special permissive law that allows ‘unpurposive’ sexual intercourse to prevent greater vices. However, as I shall argue, Kant merely recites an argument t…
Der Platz der ‚Obersten Einteilung des Naturrechts‘ (AA 06
The text of the Doctrine of Right as it was published in 1797 is generally considered to be philologically problematic, and there is debate in the literature regarding the correct arrangement of its different parts. One such topic is the correct order of the introductions and divisions of the Metaphysics of Morals and the Doctrine of Right, respectively. This paper proposes moving paragraph AA 06: 242.12–19, which discusses the “highest division …
No prominent works on this page.
Der Platz der ‚Obersten Einteilung des Naturrechts‘ (AA 06
The text of the Doctrine of Right as it was published in 1797 is generally considered to be philologically problematic, and there is debate in the literature regarding the correct arrangement of its different parts. One such topic is the correct order of the introductions and divisions of the Metaphysics of Morals and the Doctrine of Right, respectively. This paper proposes moving paragraph AA 06: 242.12–19, which discusses the “highest division …
Allowed by Right, Forbidden by Ethics
In the Doctrine of Virtue, Kant raises the ‘casuistical’ question of whether sexual intercourse is ethically permissible only if it serves the purpose of procreation, or whether it is also permissible when procreation is not possible, e.g. during pregnancy. It might seem that Kant is assuming a special permissive law that allows ‘unpurposive’ sexual intercourse to prevent greater vices. However, as I shall argue, Kant merely recites an argument t…
Doctrine (2 works) · Philosophical Ethics and Theory (2 works) · Argument (complex analysis) (1 works) · Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (1 works) · Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations (1 works) · Law and Political Science (1 works) · Metaphysics (1 works) · Natural (archaeology) (1 works) · Paragraph (1 works) · Permissive (1 works)