Çetin Önder
Biographic Data
| ID | 9422878 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Çetin Önder |
| GIVEN NAMES | Çetin |
| FAMILY NAME | Önder |
| SIGNATURE | ÖNDER Ç |
| AFFILIATIONS | Ankara University |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-3490-8039 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 2 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 2 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2023 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Game of thrones, university edition
University rankings persist despite contested metrics, the problematic incentives they generate, and the strategic gaming they invite – dynamics that should undermine their claim to measuring excellence, deter participation, and ultimately erode the rankings themselves. This study addresses such persistence by reconceptualizing rankings as cycles of gaming and counter-gaming in which rankers and universities interactively reproduce what counts as…
Bearing the Brunt of Legitimacy and Power Challenges
In this paper, we present an analytical narrative of the events that culminated in the Turkish Armed Forces’ (the TAF) fall from grace between 1997 and 2018. The narrative is guided by a conceptual framework that features organizational legitimacy and power as key to strategizing by societal constituencies. Based on this framework, we describe how the Turkish government consecutively raised legitimacy and power challenges to the TAF, underscoring…
No prominent works on this page.
Bearing the Brunt of Legitimacy and Power Challenges
In this paper, we present an analytical narrative of the events that culminated in the Turkish Armed Forces’ (the TAF) fall from grace between 1997 and 2018. The narrative is guided by a conceptual framework that features organizational legitimacy and power as key to strategizing by societal constituencies. Based on this framework, we describe how the Turkish government consecutively raised legitimacy and power challenges to the TAF, underscoring…
Game of thrones, university edition
University rankings persist despite contested metrics, the problematic incentives they generate, and the strategic gaming they invite – dynamics that should undermine their claim to measuring excellence, deter participation, and ultimately erode the rankings themselves. This study addresses such persistence by reconceptualizing rankings as cycles of gaming and counter-gaming in which rankers and universities interactively reproduce what counts as…
Academic Publishing and Open Access (1 works) · Defense, Military, and Policy Studies (1 works) · Digital Education and Society (1 works) · Higher education (1 works) · Innovations in Educational Methods (1 works) · International Relations and Foreign Policy (1 works) · Law (1 works) · Legitimacy (1 works) · Narrative (1 works) · Physics (1 works)