Sitaram Devarakonda
Biographic Data
| ID | 9458089 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Sitaram Devarakonda |
| GIVEN NAMES | Sitaram |
| FAMILY NAME | Devarakonda |
| SIGNATURE | DEVARAKONDA S |
| AFFILIATIONS | NETE (United States) |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-7722-756X |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 5 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 5 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2020 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2020 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Disruptive papers published in Scientometrics
Wu et al. (Nature 566:378–382, 2019) introduced a new indicator measuring disruption ( $${DI}_{1}$$ DI 1 ). Bornmann et al. (Do disruption index indicators measure what they propose to measure? The comparison of several indicator variants with assessments by peers, 2019. https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.08775 ) compared variants of the disruption index and pointed to $${DI}_{5}$$ DI 5 as an interesting variant. The calculation of a field-specific versi…
Viewing computer science through citation analysis
Frequently cocited publications
Cocitation measurements can reveal the extent to which a concept representing a novel combination of existing ideas evolves towards a specialty. The strength of cocitation is represented by its frequency, which accumulates over time. Of interest is whether underlying features associated with the strength of cocitation can be identified. We use the proximal citation network for a given pair of articles ( x, y) to compute θ, an a priori estimate of…
Are disruption index indicators convergently valid? The comparison of several indicator variants with assessments by peers
Recently, Wu, Wang, and Evans (2019) proposed a new family of indicators, which measure whether a scientific publication is disruptive to a field or tradition of research. Such disruptive influences are characterized by citations to a focal paper, but not its cited references. In this study, we are interested in the question of convergent validity. We used external criteria of newness to examine convergent validity: In the postpublication peer re…
Co-citations in context
Citation analysis of the scientific literature has been used to study and define disciplinary boundaries, to trace the dissemination of knowledge, and to estimate impact. Co-citation, the frequency with which pairs of publications are cited, provides insight into how documents relate to each other and across fields. Co-citation analysis has been used to characterize combinations of prior work as conventional or innovative and to derive features o…
No prominent works on this page.
Disruptive papers published in Scientometrics
Wu et al. (Nature 566:378–382, 2019) introduced a new indicator measuring disruption ( $${DI}_{1}$$ DI 1 ). Bornmann et al. (Do disruption index indicators measure what they propose to measure? The comparison of several indicator variants with assessments by peers, 2019. https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.08775 ) compared variants of the disruption index and pointed to $${DI}_{5}$$ DI 5 as an interesting variant. The calculation of a field-specific versi…
Viewing computer science through citation analysis
Frequently cocited publications
Cocitation measurements can reveal the extent to which a concept representing a novel combination of existing ideas evolves towards a specialty. The strength of cocitation is represented by its frequency, which accumulates over time. Of interest is whether underlying features associated with the strength of cocitation can be identified. We use the proximal citation network for a given pair of articles ( x, y) to compute θ, an a priori estimate of…
Are disruption index indicators convergently valid? The comparison of several indicator variants with assessments by peers
Recently, Wu, Wang, and Evans (2019) proposed a new family of indicators, which measure whether a scientific publication is disruptive to a field or tradition of research. Such disruptive influences are characterized by citations to a focal paper, but not its cited references. In this study, we are interested in the question of convergent validity. We used external criteria of newness to examine convergent validity: In the postpublication peer re…
Co-citations in context
Citation analysis of the scientific literature has been used to study and define disciplinary boundaries, to trace the dissemination of knowledge, and to estimate impact. Co-citation, the frequency with which pairs of publications are cited, provides insight into how documents relate to each other and across fields. Co-citation analysis has been used to characterize combinations of prior work as conventional or innovative and to derive features o…
scientometrics and bibliometrics research (5 works) · Complex Network Analysis Techniques (3 works) · Artificial Intelligence (2 works) · Artificial Intelligence (2 works) · Citation (2 works) · Citation analysis (2 works) · Computer Science (2 works) · Library science (2 works) · A priori and a posteriori (1 work) · Academic Publishing and Open Access (1 work)