Elena Alina Onţanu
Biographic Data
| ID | 9458687 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Elena Alina Onţanu |
| GIVEN NAMES | Elena Alina |
| FAMILY NAME | Onţanu |
| SIGNATURE | ONŢANU E A |
| AFFILIATIONS | Tilburg University |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-6935-3627 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 3 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2021 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2023 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
The Digitalisation of European Union Procedures
The COVID-19 pandemic temporarily brought national and cross-border procedures to a standstill. Prior to the pandemic, the use of information and communication technology in court procedures was mostly voluntary and seldom used; although various developments were contemplated, they were slow to be financed and implemented. The pandemic and associated limitations gave digitalisation of procedures, including at the European Union (EU) level, a new …
Normalising the use of electronic evidence
Society is increasingly relying on technology for daily business and activities. This is linked to a rapid update in technology use and digitalisation with courts being called to consider new forms of evidence in an electronic environment and/or rely on technology for the taking of evidence. The normative framework concerning electronic evidence remains fragmented while various legislative projects are ongoing. In this process the global pandemic…
The challenge of comparing EU Member States judicial data
The number of cases is measured through a broad range of quantitative variables used in various studies and policy papers as key indicators of the volume of activity of national courts. Additionally, these variables, together with other data (e.g. time needed to resolve a case, number of judges, etc.) are part of a broader discourse on the efficiency of justice systems. However, such discourse can be problematic when data is not actually comparab…
No prominent works on this page.
The challenge of comparing EU Member States judicial data
The number of cases is measured through a broad range of quantitative variables used in various studies and policy papers as key indicators of the volume of activity of national courts. Additionally, these variables, together with other data (e.g. time needed to resolve a case, number of judges, etc.) are part of a broader discourse on the efficiency of justice systems. However, such discourse can be problematic when data is not actually comparab…
Normalising the use of electronic evidence
Society is increasingly relying on technology for daily business and activities. This is linked to a rapid update in technology use and digitalisation with courts being called to consider new forms of evidence in an electronic environment and/or rely on technology for the taking of evidence. The normative framework concerning electronic evidence remains fragmented while various legislative projects are ongoing. In this process the global pandemic…
The Digitalisation of European Union Procedures
The COVID-19 pandemic temporarily brought national and cross-border procedures to a standstill. Prior to the pandemic, the use of information and communication technology in court procedures was mostly voluntary and seldom used; although various developments were contemplated, they were slow to be financed and implemented. The pandemic and associated limitations gave digitalisation of procedures, including at the European Union (EU) level, a new …
Business (3 works) · Economic Justice (3 works) · Law (3 works) · Political science (3 works) · Computer Science (2 works) · Engineering (2 works) · European and International Law Studies (2 works) · European union (2 works) · Public relations (2 works) · Artificial Intelligence in Law (1 work)