Cristian‐Gabriel Bîzoi
Biographic Data
| ID | 9480705 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Cristian‐Gabriel Bîzoi |
| GIVEN NAMES | Cristian‐Gabriel |
| FAMILY NAME | Bîzoi |
| SIGNATURE | BÎZOI C G |
| AFFILIATIONS | West University of Timişoara |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 2 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 2 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Ethical imperatives and societal transformation
This article examines how Romania’s post-communist reparations regime operates in practice through a case study of a civil damages pathway created for victims of communist-era political persecution and their heirs. The problem addressed is the gap between formal recognition of persecution and the uneven delivery of material and moral redress. The article focuses on a family subjected to the Bărăgan deportations, a campaign of forced internal disp…
What if Adam Smith Debated an AI Economist
Can AI‐driven capitalism sustain the moral preconditions of market order? We stage a dialogue between Adam Smith and a steel‐manned “EconAI” to test four Moral‐Market‐Fitness criteria: trustworthiness, fairness, non‐domination, and contestability, across 11 dilemmas. Our heterodox claim is anti‐sufficiency: procedural fixes and CSR‐centric governance do not, by themselves, convert optimization into moral market order. We argue for a two‐step path…
No prominent works on this page.
Ethical imperatives and societal transformation
This article examines how Romania’s post-communist reparations regime operates in practice through a case study of a civil damages pathway created for victims of communist-era political persecution and their heirs. The problem addressed is the gap between formal recognition of persecution and the uneven delivery of material and moral redress. The article focuses on a family subjected to the Bărăgan deportations, a campaign of forced internal disp…
What if Adam Smith Debated an AI Economist
Can AI‐driven capitalism sustain the moral preconditions of market order? We stage a dialogue between Adam Smith and a steel‐manned “EconAI” to test four Moral‐Market‐Fitness criteria: trustworthiness, fairness, non‐domination, and contestability, across 11 dilemmas. Our heterodox claim is anti‐sufficiency: procedural fixes and CSR‐centric governance do not, by themselves, convert optimization into moral market order. We argue for a two‐step path…
Adam smith (1 work) · Appeal (1 work) · Capitalism (1 work) · Corporate governance (1 work) · Damages (1 work) · Digital Economy and Work Transformation (1 work) · Economic Justice (1 work) · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (1 work) · Eviction (1 work) · Free market (1 work)