Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Dustin D Klinger

Biographic Data

ID9489259
NAMEDustin D Klinger
GIVEN NAMESDustin D
FAMILY NAMEKlinger
SIGNATUREKLINGER D D
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Cambridge
ORCID0000-0002-3850-1375
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS4
TOTAL CITATIONS0
WORKS AS AUTHOR4
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2022
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2025
H-INDEX0
  • “All knowledge is either conception or assent”. On the history and significance of a fundamental distinction in Islamic philosophy

    Open Access•Dustin D Klinger•ARTICLE•British Journal for the History…•2025

    Following Aristotle, classical Islamic philosophers distinguished between two types of knowledge: conception and assent. This paper argues that the discussions elicited by this distinction are an essential feature of postclassical Islamic philosophy (ca. 1200–1800). The early postclassical philosophers made the distinction central to logic and thereby to epistemology and scientific inquiry at large. As the distinction came to be perceived as prob…

  • Being Another Way

    Dustin D Klinger•BOOK•Being Another Way•2024

  • Forms of Carroll’s Paradox in Post-Classical Arabic Logic

    Dustin D Klinger•ARTICLE•History and Philosophy of Logic•2024

    Arabic logicians in the thirteenth century discussed a set of arguments raised by the theologian Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī (d. 1210) that in some respects closely resembles Carroll’s paradox. Roughly, the paradox states that we can never reach a conclusion from a set of premises without incurring an infinite regress. The present article presents and discusses Rāzī’s formulation of the problem with syllogistic deduction, his own solutions to the proble…

  • Rereading Metaphysics Ε2-3

    Open Access•Dustin Klinger, Dustin D Klinger•ARTICLE•Arabic Sciences and Philosophy•2022

    In the fresh reading proposed here of the still not satisfactorily interpreted passages in Metaphysics Ε2-3, Aristotle emerges as making a case against determinism based on a robust notion of the accident. Accidental beings are uncaused causes and have their rightful place in Aristotle's ontology. The resulting physical indeterminism is here used as a litmus test for the exegetical practice of the great Commentator, Averroes, whose self-proclaime…

No prominent works on this page.

  • Rereading Metaphysics Ε2-3

    Open Access•Dustin Klinger, Dustin D Klinger•ARTICLE•Arabic Sciences and Philosophy•2022

    In the fresh reading proposed here of the still not satisfactorily interpreted passages in Metaphysics Ε2-3, Aristotle emerges as making a case against determinism based on a robust notion of the accident. Accidental beings are uncaused causes and have their rightful place in Aristotle's ontology. The resulting physical indeterminism is here used as a litmus test for the exegetical practice of the great Commentator, Averroes, whose self-proclaime…

  • Being Another Way

    Dustin D Klinger•BOOK•Being Another Way•2024

  • Forms of Carroll’s Paradox in Post-Classical Arabic Logic

    Dustin D Klinger•ARTICLE•History and Philosophy of Logic•2024

    Arabic logicians in the thirteenth century discussed a set of arguments raised by the theologian Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī (d. 1210) that in some respects closely resembles Carroll’s paradox. Roughly, the paradox states that we can never reach a conclusion from a set of premises without incurring an infinite regress. The present article presents and discusses Rāzī’s formulation of the problem with syllogistic deduction, his own solutions to the proble…

  • “All knowledge is either conception or assent”. On the history and significance of a fundamental distinction in Islamic philosophy

    Open Access•Dustin D Klinger•ARTICLE•British Journal for the History…•2025

    Following Aristotle, classical Islamic philosophers distinguished between two types of knowledge: conception and assent. This paper argues that the discussions elicited by this distinction are an essential feature of postclassical Islamic philosophy (ca. 1200–1800). The early postclassical philosophers made the distinction central to logic and thereby to epistemology and scientific inquiry at large. As the distinction came to be perceived as prob…

Epistemology (3 works) · Medieval and Classical Philosophy (3 works) · Philosophy (3 works) · Islamic Studies and History (2 works) · Accidental (1 work) · Arabic (1 work) · Classical Philosophy and Thought (1 work) · Computer Science (1 work) · Determinism (1 work) · Historical and Linguistic Studies (1 work)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae