Fabian Ruge
Biographic Data
| ID | 9489816 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Fabian Ruge |
| GIVEN NAMES | Fabian |
| FAMILY NAME | Ruge |
| SIGNATURE | RUGE F |
| AFFILIATIONS | Università degli studi di Torino Dipartimento di Studi Storici Torino Italy |
| ORCID | 0009-0005-0950-8040 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 2 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 2 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2023 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2024 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
The Stoic Distinction between Syllogisms and Subsyllogisms
This paper aims to explain the distinction between syllogisms and subsyllogisms in Stoic logic. Subsyllogisms replace at least one premise in a syllogism with a premise that is, according to Galen and Alexander, equipollent to the respective syllogistic premise. This equipollence is not synonymy of meaning between two linguistic expressions, but obtains between two propositions when they are true or false by the same standard. Subsyllogistic prem…
Connexivity in Aristotle’s Logic
At APr 2.4 57a36–13, Aristotle presents a notorious reductio argument in which he derives the claim ‘If B is not large, B is large’ and calls that result impossible. Aristotle is thus committed to some form of connexivity and this paper argues that his commitment is to a strong form of connexivity which excludes even cases in which ‘B is large’ is necessary. It is further argued that Aristotle’s view of connexivity is best understood as arising f…
No prominent works on this page.
Connexivity in Aristotle’s Logic
At APr 2.4 57a36–13, Aristotle presents a notorious reductio argument in which he derives the claim ‘If B is not large, B is large’ and calls that result impossible. Aristotle is thus committed to some form of connexivity and this paper argues that his commitment is to a strong form of connexivity which excludes even cases in which ‘B is large’ is necessary. It is further argued that Aristotle’s view of connexivity is best understood as arising f…
The Stoic Distinction between Syllogisms and Subsyllogisms
This paper aims to explain the distinction between syllogisms and subsyllogisms in Stoic logic. Subsyllogisms replace at least one premise in a syllogism with a premise that is, according to Galen and Alexander, equipollent to the respective syllogistic premise. This equipollence is not synonymy of meaning between two linguistic expressions, but obtains between two propositions when they are true or false by the same standard. Subsyllogistic prem…
Epistemology (2 works) · Philosophy (2 works) · Advanced Algebra and Logic (1 work) · Argument (complex analysis) (1 work) · Classical Antiquity Studies (1 work) · Classical Philosophy and Thought (1 work) · Context (archaeology) (1 work) · History (1 work) · Linguistics (1 work) · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (1 work)