Adriano Angelucci
Biographic Data
| ID | 9505360 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Adriano Angelucci |
| GIVEN NAMES | Adriano |
| FAMILY NAME | Angelucci |
| SIGNATURE | ANGELUCCI A |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Urbino |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 2 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 2 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2025 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2025 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Green nudges, metacognition and rational agency. Do energy defaults undermine individual autonomy
We define climate-change-responsive behaviors (CRBs) as explicit individual behaviors that directly result in a reduction of emissions. At present, the election of greener energy tariffs is a CRB well worth encouraging, and energy defaults have proved remarkably effective in achieving this goal. According to an apparently compelling objection, however, defaults would seriously undermine our rational agency, and their use in policy should therefor…
On justifying case verdicts. A dialectical hypothesis
The method of cases (MOC), as standardly construed, involves an evidential appeal to intuitions. Philosophers, however, often argue for their case verdicts, they offer reasons for accepting their truth. According to Max Deutsch and Herman Cappelen – whose ground-breaking case studies first drew attention to this underappreciated phenomenon – their reason-giving would constitute compelling evidence that, contrary to the received view, philosophers…
No prominent works on this page.
Green nudges, metacognition and rational agency. Do energy defaults undermine individual autonomy
We define climate-change-responsive behaviors (CRBs) as explicit individual behaviors that directly result in a reduction of emissions. At present, the election of greener energy tariffs is a CRB well worth encouraging, and energy defaults have proved remarkably effective in achieving this goal. According to an apparently compelling objection, however, defaults would seriously undermine our rational agency, and their use in policy should therefor…
On justifying case verdicts. A dialectical hypothesis
The method of cases (MOC), as standardly construed, involves an evidential appeal to intuitions. Philosophers, however, often argue for their case verdicts, they offer reasons for accepting their truth. According to Max Deutsch and Herman Cappelen – whose ground-breaking case studies first drew attention to this underappreciated phenomenon – their reason-giving would constitute compelling evidence that, contrary to the received view, philosophers…
Appeal (1 works) · Autonomy (1 works) · Behavioral economics (1 works) · Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 works) · Climate Change Communication and Perception (1 works) · Default (1 works) · Dialectic (1 works) · Environmental Education and Sustainability (1 works) · Epistemology (1 works) · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (1 works)