Maarten van Leeuwen
Biographic Data
| ID | 9556006 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Maarten van Leeuwen |
| GIVEN NAMES | Maarten |
| FAMILY NAME | van Leeuwen |
| SIGNATURE | VAN LEEUWEN M |
| AFFILIATIONS | Leiden University |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-8681-2493 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 3 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2021 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Linguistic Choices and Argumentative Effects
This study assesses whether the linguistic choices that Van Haaften and Van Leeuwen identified in the so-called ‘Van Gelder’ court case (as reported in a.o. Journal of Argumentation in Context 10 (1), 97-120, 2021) have empirically demonstrable argumentative effects. This case revolves around proceedings that Yuri van Gelder brought against the Dutch Olympic committee, given his removal from the Olympic gymnastics final due to misbehaviour. Van H…
Anatomy education in low-resourced countries
PURPOSE: With limited means, resource-deprived countries must find ways to organize education to meet standards. Few reports exist about anatomical education in LLMICs. This study explores how anatomy teaching is sustained in countries with few resources and which affordable educational strategies are applied to uphold quality. METHODS: email combined with semi-structured online interview with teachers, exploring survey results at a deeper level.…
“Those are Your Words, Not Mine!” Defence Strategies for Denying Speaker Commitment
In response to an accusation of having said something inappropriate, the accused may exploit the difference between the explicit contents of their utterance and its implicatures. Widely discussed in the pragmatics literature are those cases in which arguers accept accountability only for the explicit contents of what they said while denying commitment to the (alleged) implicature (“Those are your words, not mine!”). In this paper, we sketch a ful…
No prominent works on this page.
“Those are Your Words, Not Mine!” Defence Strategies for Denying Speaker Commitment
In response to an accusation of having said something inappropriate, the accused may exploit the difference between the explicit contents of their utterance and its implicatures. Widely discussed in the pragmatics literature are those cases in which arguers accept accountability only for the explicit contents of what they said while denying commitment to the (alleged) implicature (“Those are your words, not mine!”). In this paper, we sketch a ful…
Anatomy education in low-resourced countries
PURPOSE: With limited means, resource-deprived countries must find ways to organize education to meet standards. Few reports exist about anatomical education in LLMICs. This study explores how anatomy teaching is sustained in countries with few resources and which affordable educational strategies are applied to uphold quality. METHODS: email combined with semi-structured online interview with teachers, exploring survey results at a deeper level.…
Linguistic Choices and Argumentative Effects
This study assesses whether the linguistic choices that Van Haaften and Van Leeuwen identified in the so-called ‘Van Gelder’ court case (as reported in a.o. Journal of Argumentation in Context 10 (1), 97-120, 2021) have empirically demonstrable argumentative effects. This case revolves around proceedings that Yuri van Gelder brought against the Dutch Olympic committee, given his removal from the Olympic gymnastics final due to misbehaviour. Van H…
Computer Science (2 works) · Political science (2 works) · Allegation (1 work) · Ambiguity (1 work) · Anatomy and Medical Technology (1 work) · Appeal (1 work) · Argumentation theory (1 work) · Argumentative (1 work) · Categorization (1 work) · Deception (1 work)