Richard Funston
Biographic Data
| ID | 957126 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Richard Funston |
| GIVEN NAMES | Richard |
| FAMILY NAME | Funston |
| SIGNATURE | FUNSTON R |
| AFFILIATIONS | San Diego State University |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 7 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 64 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 7 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1971 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1979 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
A Vital National Seminar
Funston Reply to Canon and Ulmer
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content
The Double Standard of Constitutional Protection in the Era of the Welfare State
More than a third of a century ago Justice Harlan Fiske Stone labored and brought forth an opinion for the Supreme Court in the case of United States v. Carolene Produicts Co.1 The case was a pedestrian one, dealing with government regulation of adulterated milk, and Stone's opinion was in keeping with its character. Indeed, the decision might have passed into obscurity with the vast bulk of the Court's nonlandmark cases, had Stone not chosen the…
The Supreme Court and Critical Elections
Several years ago Professor Robert Dahl argued that the traditional concern over the Supreme Court's power of judicial review was largely unfounded. Dahl demonstrated that seldom, if ever, had the Court been successful in blocking the will of a law-making majority. This paper argues that, had Dahl considered his data from a different perspective, he would have discovered that, by virtue of the recruitment process, the Court will rarely even attem…
The Guarantee Clause of the Constitution
Pornography and Politics
Pornography and Politics
IN RECENT months the reports of two presidential commissions, one on campus disorders, another dealing with pornography, have occasioned a good deal of acrimonious debate. Even before either of the reports was issued, both had been attacked (and defended) with fiery conviction. This conviction, however, has produced much heat, but little light. This has been so, because the critics and defenders have often been contending over documents unseen, i…
The Supreme Court and Critical Elections
Several years ago Professor Robert Dahl argued that the traditional concern over the Supreme Court's power of judicial review was largely unfounded. Dahl demonstrated that seldom, if ever, had the Court been successful in blocking the will of a law-making majority. This paper argues that, had Dahl considered his data from a different perspective, he would have discovered that, by virtue of the recruitment process, the Court will rarely even attem…
The Double Standard of Constitutional Protection in the Era of the Welfare State
More than a third of a century ago Justice Harlan Fiske Stone labored and brought forth an opinion for the Supreme Court in the case of United States v. Carolene Produicts Co.1 The case was a pedestrian one, dealing with government regulation of adulterated milk, and Stone's opinion was in keeping with its character. Indeed, the decision might have passed into obscurity with the vast bulk of the Court's nonlandmark cases, had Stone not chosen the…
Funston Reply to Canon and Ulmer
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content
Pornography and Politics
Pornography and Politics
IN RECENT months the reports of two presidential commissions, one on campus disorders, another dealing with pornography, have occasioned a good deal of acrimonious debate. Even before either of the reports was issued, both had been attacked (and defended) with fiery conviction. This conviction, however, has produced much heat, but little light. This has been so, because the critics and defenders have often been contending over documents unseen, i…
The Guarantee Clause of the Constitution
The Double Standard of Constitutional Protection in the Era of the Welfare State
More than a third of a century ago Justice Harlan Fiske Stone labored and brought forth an opinion for the Supreme Court in the case of United States v. Carolene Produicts Co.1 The case was a pedestrian one, dealing with government regulation of adulterated milk, and Stone's opinion was in keeping with its character. Indeed, the decision might have passed into obscurity with the vast bulk of the Court's nonlandmark cases, had Stone not chosen the…
The Supreme Court and Critical Elections
Several years ago Professor Robert Dahl argued that the traditional concern over the Supreme Court's power of judicial review was largely unfounded. Dahl demonstrated that seldom, if ever, had the Court been successful in blocking the will of a law-making majority. This paper argues that, had Dahl considered his data from a different perspective, he would have discovered that, by virtue of the recruitment process, the Court will rarely even attem…
Funston Reply to Canon and Ulmer
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content
A Vital National Seminar
Political science (7 works) · Law (6 works) · Philosophy (4 works) · Supreme court (4 works) · American Constitutional Law and Politics (3 works) · Constitution (3 works) · Judicial and Constitutional Studies (3 works) · Politics (3 works) · Sociology (3 works) · Commission (2 works)